Preview

Ontological Argumentative Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
232 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ontological Argumentative Analysis
What most took my attention throughout chapter 2 was when Anselm stated: "Hence, it is impossible that God not exist, and this is what we mean by a 'necessary being.' A necessary being could not fail to exist." A little after this quote he says that we as humans are unnecessary beings like if our history was different, we might not be here since our parents might of never have met, but since God is different and necessary so he had to always exist. Which caused the Ontological Argument which has swayed many to believe in that this logic is correct and sound. I do have a question that really can't be answered is that what would be the world be like if we didn't have God or history has been altered, their have been many movies where someone from
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    • Explain Anselm's Ontological Argument (25 Marks)
    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages

    • Explain Anselm's Ontological Argument (25 Marks)

    Anselm put forward his ideas about the existence of God through his book, the Proslogion. He started by simply giving the word ‘God’ a definition, and then explaining that to not believe in God was absurd. The Proslogion consisted of two main parts. In Proslogion 1, Anselm explained God as being…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate Anselm's Ontological Argument
    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Evaluate Anselm's Ontological Argument

    explanation that God necessarily exists. Anselm's goal is to prove to the "fool" that God has to…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Teleological Argument Analysis
    • 86 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Teleological Argument Analysis

    There is one prevailing question we ask ourselves consistently, “Does God exist?” Every human answer’s that question in their own unique way, which is contingent upon their beliefs, experiences, and influences. The existence of God was significantly debated among philosophers during the 18th and 19th centuries and each esteemed philosopher had a distinct argument explaining their rationale, while criticizing another’s. In this paper, I will analyze William Paley’s argument, “The Teleological Argument,” and how it is disparaged by David Hume and his argument for apparent…

    • 86 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Anselm Ontological Argument Analysis
    • 118 Words
    • 1 Page

    Anselm Ontological Argument Analysis

    Anselm is not trying to say that whatever one can think of exist because, everyone can think of something that does not exist. Neither is he trying to saying believing in something without any doubt makes it exist. Finally Anselm might believe in God, he is not trying to convince us that God exist but rather he is trying to show us that once one understands or grasp the concept of who or what God, then based on logic it follows that God has to exist. Anselm ontological argument follows that if one makes an assumption and can show things that follow from that assumption lead to contradiction, then the initial assumption is rejected and conclude the opposite…

    • 118 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Logic Cannot Prove the Existence of God
    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Logic Cannot Prove the Existence of God

    For Anselm, using logic that can be deducted about God, it is clear to see that God’s existence is necessary. In the second ontological argument from Anselm, God is the greatest being possible; it is greater to exist by necessity than by contingence, it is therefore, impossible for God to not exist. In this argument, God’s existence is an analytic statement, it is impossible to prove that God exists and although Anselm believes that it does not need to be proven, there is no way of knowing that it is analytic. For example take triangles, every triangle that anyone can ever think of will have 3 sides that all add up to 180 degrees, that is simply a part of what a triangle is. Humans can however, prove this by drawing every possible triangle and testing them to see, with God’s existence that is not possible. For humans to consider his existence as an analytic statement, they would have to go faith and logic alone. In a way God’s existence could be a synthetic statement, which would mean that it would need to proven before the statement was true or not, the reason for this is because whether God exists or not does not prove his existence in reality as Anselm suggests in his argument. Kant would agree with this as he reviews Anselm’s ontological argument by saying that God’s existence is not a predicate, existence may be a part of the concept of God, but it does not proof that God exists.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Erikson's Argumentative Analysis
    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Erikson's Argumentative Analysis

    In one of the grand theories of Freud vs. Erikson, I am strongly in favor of Erikson’s ideas as opposed to Sigmund Freud, in the fact that I agree that children’s developmental stages are more psychosocial than psychosexual. For example, I have two children of my own which I can correlate a lot of their behavior to Erikson’s stages. Babies cry in signal to their parents that something is wrong, when they feel nurtured and either the mother or father tend to their needs, such as diapering or feeding then they gain a sense of trust in their caregivers. My two year old son is at the stage now of initiative vs. guilt; whereas he has an adventurous spirit that leads him to “undertake many adult like activities” (Berger, 2014, p. 40). He is strong…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pyrrhonian Argumentative Analysis
    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pyrrhonian Argumentative Analysis

    The method of skeptical inquiry or way by which Pyrrhonian skeptics bring themselves to withhold assent to every non evident proposition is known as the modes of suspension of judgment. There are five such modes that Sextus provides and they are based on: Discrepancy, regress ad infinitum, relativity, hypothesis and circular reasoning. (Empiricus, 165–169) The modes are designed to assist Pyrrhonian skeptics in in continuing their inquiry by guarding themselves from the disquieting state of dogmatism. For the sake of argument, suppose there is a dogmatist who believes that P. In order to avoid the snares of dogmatism, the Pyrrhonian skeptic would resort to withhold assent about P. According to the mode deriving from discrepancy, due to an undecidable…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Explain Anselms Ontological Argument
    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Explain Anselms Ontological Argument

    Anselm also says that God could possibly be a contingent God, who is dependent on something else for existence. If this was true God would not be worthy of worship and would not be the greatest conceivable being. A necessary God, one whose non existence is impossible, is greater than a contingent God whose non existence is possible. God has no creator, so to have to have someone else to depend on for existence, means they are not God. Therefore, we must accept that god is also necessary, as well as existant in reality, because to think otherwise involves a contradiction. The reason for people being able to deny the existence of God is due to them knowing the definition of the word God, not the existence of…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of The Ontological Argument
    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page

    Summary Of The Ontological Argument

    The ontological argument that discusses the viewpoints that support the concept of God and also question God’s existence. The argument is strongly reductio ad absurdum, which is a type of argument focusing on the assumption of truth of a statement that is false, and thus proving that assumption becomes a contradiction. To illustrate, St Anselm used the ontological argument to show that “God doesn’t exist” and proved that the statement lead to a contradiction and thus, the entire statement becomes false. Guanillo criticizes St Anselm’s argument by saying that it is impossible to come up with a perfect being such a God as no perfection exists in humanity.…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Artificial Intelligence Argumentative Analysis
    • 1851 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Artificial Intelligence Argumentative Analysis

    A multitude of different movies portrays Artificial Intelligence (AI) as something to be feared; an entity that would be the demise of humanity. Despite what these movies portray, it is up for dispute whether AI is a threat to humanity. AI is becoming more commonplace and more advanced everyday both in the real and virtual world. Multiple different AI entities have previously malfunctioned and caused issues. A multitude of groups of individuals feels that restrictions should be placed on AI entities, while others believe that AI poses no threat to any individual. Whether or not, AI is a threat is still up to question.…

    • 1851 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Anselm's Cosmological Argument
    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Anselm's Cosmological Argument

    Anselm seeks to explain the existence of a greatest being, i.e. God. He approaches this task not via our experience of the universe, but rather attempts to explain it solely based upon reason. Anselm attempts to prove the existence of God by providing us with a logical explanation, based upon our understanding, definition, and necessity of God.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Ontological Argument
    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Ontological Argument

    Through the ontological argument, Anselm seeks to prove that God exists and he attempts to refute the fool who says in his heart that there is no God. This fool has two important characteristics: he understands the claim that God exists and he does not believe that God exists. Gaunilo plays the role of the “fool” and challenges Anselm’s ontological argument. I will argue that Anselm’s response to Gaunilo’s attack is not adequate because it does not address the issue of certainty, which plays an important role in Gaunilo’s objection. First, I will explain, in greater depth, Anselm’s ontological argument. I will then elaborate on why Gaunilo denies that than which nothing greater can be conceived exists in the understanding. Lastly, I will argue why Anselm’s response to Gaunilo’s attack is insufficient.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    State Of Texas Argumentative Analysis
    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages

    State Of Texas Argumentative Analysis

    The State of Texas is known for their strict rules on voting rights for convicts these including those who are currently incarcerated and those individuals who are released, but on parole. However, ex-offenders who have completed their probation and parole regain their voting rights but would have to re-register. I believe the voting rights for prisoners and ex-convicts should be reformed and changed in the State of Texas. The reason I stand by this is because they’re still citizens of the United States of America.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Ontological Argument
    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ontological Argument

    In his argument, Anselm defines God as “that than which nothing greater can be conceived.” This can be interpreted as defining “God” as maximal perfection, or the greatest possible being. It doesn’t matter what one means when they use the term “God”. If the argument proves that such a being exists, then it does so regardless of what one wishes to call the being of maximal perfection. Anselm also argues that God exists as an idea in the mind. A being that exists, as an idea in the mind and in reality, is greater than a being that exists only as an idea in the mind. Thus, if God exists only as an idea in the mind, then we can imagine something that is greater than God (the greatest possible being that does exist in reality). According to Anselm’s argument, we cannot imagine something that is greater than God, for it is a contradiction to suppose that we can imagine a being greater than the greatest possible being that can be imagined. Therefore, concludes Anselm, God exists.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argument Analysis: The Scientific Method
    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Argument Analysis: The Scientific Method

    The scientific method is a way of applying steps to solve a problem and come to a conclusion based on the data. The scientific method has evolved over the years into the system we have in place now. Induction is what the scientific method begins with in today’s world. You start with a question that needs solving and then forms the hypothesis. Then, experiments are set up to test these theories which help to rule out any other variables. In the past theories were based off of feelings or perceptions rather than facts or reasoning. In my opinion, the most appealing view of the scientific method is a view proposed by…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics