Preview

Obergefell V Reynold's Dichotomy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
629 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Obergefell V Reynold's Dichotomy
OPTION C: SAME SEX MARRIAGE AND POLYGAMY
Imagine that you were a Supreme Court justice when the same-sex marriage case (Obergefell v.Hodges) was decided. How would you have voted and why? Now imagine that a case about legalizing polygamy (overturning Reynolds v. United States) comes before the court. How would you vote and why?

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) had a case brought before them on April 28th, 2015 named Obergefell v.Hodges (Maureen-Johnston. 2017). The case was presented by groups of same-sex couples wanting to bring forward the issue of marriage equality. Their argument was the under the 14th amendment, that the ban of same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. "Obergefell v. Hodges." the 14th amendment states …show more content…
United States is a case that was brought before SCOTUS on November 13, 1878. Reynolds v. United States. The case was about anti-bigamy laws and that the law violates a person's 1st amendment right of religious freedom. Reynolds v. United States. SCOTUS decided unanimous that no, it does not since the practice of bigamy is a criminal offence, and the 1st amendment doesn't protect against criminal offences (Reynolds v. United States). The Utah Legislation website offers what the Bigamy law in Utah is
(Utah State Legislature 2017).Though, informative and showing what degree felonies it is and can be, and never answers the question of why bigamy is illegal. Digging a little deeper into the internet, I still couldn't find why bigamy is illegal. From my own conclusions i deduct that it is legally mainly because of the fraud that could happen, and the practice of under age brides that could also happen. However, my opinion is why not? If we look back to when i defined marriage in the second paragraph (Fundamentals of a marriage is taught as an accord of two people who unify the couple “sexually, cooperate economically, and may give birth to, adopt, or rear children” (Strong, B, & Cohen, T. F. 2014 Page 6). I do not see why bigamy can’t be legal. There are laws that can and are in place to protect against the fraud and child brides, which all who marry have to follow anyways. I don't see why bigamy couldn't be legal. I base my decision on the 14th amendment
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    US Vs. Windsor: Case Study
    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages

    US Vs. Windsor: Case Study

    U.S. v. Windsor, 133 S. Ct. 2675 (2013), is a case about a same-sex couple that was married in 2007 in Ontario, Canada because at that time same-sex marriage was not legal in New York. The same-sex couple, Edith Windsor and Thea Spyer resided in New York. Two years after the couple was married, Spyer died, and left all of her estate to her wife, Windsor. When Windsor went to claim the federal estate tax exemption for surviving spouses, she was denied because of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which excluded same-sex partners in definition of marriage and spouse. Windsor went on with the issue, paid estate taxes over $300,000, but Window was denied the refund. She then challenged DOMA saying Section 3 was unconstitutional. After a few years with the case working its way through the courts, the Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act was unconstitutional.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Primary Source Analysis: Reynolds V. United States
    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Primary Source Analysis: Reynolds V. United States

    Reynolds v. United States, a landmark court case in 1878, upheld anti-polygamy laws previously established. The issue was whether or not the federal anti-bigamy statute violated the First Amendment 's free exercise clause because plural marriage was part of religious practice? Chief Justice Morrison R. Waite stated that the law can penalize criminal activity without regard to religious belief. The First Amendment defended religious belief; however it did not protect religious practices that could be seen as an unlawful offense such as bigamy. Waite went further to state that “those who practiced polygamy could be no more exempt from the law than those…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Obergefell V. Hodges, 576 US Case Brief
    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Obergefell V. Hodges, 576 US Case Brief

    Facts: Groups of the same sex couples sued their relevant state agencies in Ohio, Kentucky, Michigan, and Tennessee to challenge the constitutionality of those states bans on the same sex marriage or refusal to recognize legal same sex marriages that occurred in jurisdiction that provide for such marriages. James Obergefell (plaintiffs) in each case argued that the states statutes violated Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the fourteenth Amendment, and one group of plaintiffs also brought claims under the Civil Rights act. In all the cases, the trial court found in favor of the plaintiffs. The U.S Courts of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reverse and held that the states bans on same sex marriage and refusal to recognize marriages performed in other states did not violated the couples fourteenth amendment rights to equal protection and due process.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Garden State Equality Vs Dow Case Study
    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Garden State Equality Vs Dow Case Study

    As the case of Garden State Equality vs. Dow unravels into the Supreme Court hearings, there will be an indefinite variety of opinions and disputes of minds. There is room for controversy and disputes will arise. There are miss-interpretations and quotes that government officials and citizens against civil union rights have expressed and demonstrated about same-sex couples and their right to marry. This is an example of an interpretation given to describe differences in marital relationships by one of the Opinions of the Justices to the Senate, 440 Mass. at 1207, it states, “The dissimilitude between the terms “civil marriage” and “civil union” is not innocuous; it is a considered choice of…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Sandra Day O Connor Pros And Cons
    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Sandra Day O Connor Pros And Cons

    Hodges that made same sex marriage legal in all 50 states. Sotomayor united with Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anthony Kennedy, Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan in the majority, with Roberts, Alito, Scalia and Thomas dissenting.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Business Law Chapter 3 and 4 Outline
    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Business Law Chapter 3 and 4 Outline

    ISSUE: State statues definition of “marriage” -limiting it to man & woman. Unconstitutional as it bars equal protection…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Obergefell V. Hodges: Court Case Study
    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Obergefell V. Hodges: Court Case Study

    Though many know of the court case, not all people know the history of it. The part that many know is that the people were gay, lesbian, and so on, and most people also know that they were fighting for the right to marry. What too many people do not know is that even though court Justices were against it, the majority did not care since it did not affect them. Justice Scalia said the following in his statement, “The substance of today’s decree is not of immense personal importance to me.” Since in many states, previous to the law passing, barely anyone who was same-sex could marry their spouse.Though this privilege was granted to opposite-sex spouses, along with insured plans, medical plans, and many other privileges. When the law was passed, same-sex couples would have the same privileges. “Insured plans in every state will require to offer coverage to same-sex spouses to the extent such plans cover opposite-sex…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Subjectivity for Lct1 Wgu
    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Subjectivity for Lct1 Wgu

    In Maureen Dowd’s opinion column entitled “Happily Never After?” she expresses doubt in the Supreme Courts ability to rule in a way that she feels is fair to the Gay and Lesbian community. In her view the Supreme Court Justices are out of touch with society and they will fail to provide equality for gay couples who are only seeking equal respect in the law; to be treated just like other Americans and have the legal right to marry in their “pursuit of happiness.”…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    History Brief Windsor V. Us
    • 1068 Words
    • 3 Pages

    History Brief Windsor V. Us

    The Supreme Court of the United States has before them a great decision to make in the case of United States v. Windsor. This will set precedent in United States federal law that allows states to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages granted under the laws of other states. The court will deliberate on the section of Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) that defined marriage as a union between a man and a woman. This historic ruling will mark a monumental step, whether backwards or forwards, in the marriage equality movement.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Prop 8
    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Prop 8

    The freedom to marry is a fundamental right, it's an expression of emotional support and public commitment. The plantiffs, the gay and lesbian communiuty, argue that they deserve the "fundamental" right to marry their partner. The state of California wants to keep sexual activity withing marriages and because of Prop 8, same sex couples are permitted to engage in any sexual activity. However, same sex couples are allowed to adopt children. Plantiffs want to have the state recognize their relationships. The Equal Protection Law of the fourtheenth ammendment states that "no state deny any person within its jurisdiction." Evidence at the trial shows that marriage in the US traditionally…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    hudson draper
    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages

    hudson draper

    The South’s leadership was badly split over the question of Utah Statehood. The theory of popular sovereignty was something many southerners believed should be applied to polygamy, and plural marriage itself should be left to the people’s choice - the Mormons lead states’ rights. This shows the paradox of Utah, today, focusing strongly on little federal influence, but also encouraging such federal involvements which benefit the state.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Supreme Court Vs Indecisive Government
    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Supreme Court Vs Indecisive Government

    Many groups believe that the government is obligated to respect their rights because it would be a violation of the constitution. Nevertheless, it took longer for them to reach a decision because most individuals thought it was violating their religious views. Today in most states, they allow these marriages to be exercised in full authority. In these cases I can see how the Supreme Court has evolved and increased civil rights during distinct eras in history. The Supreme Court seems to acknowledge what the people want and have quickly tried to make some kind of action that would benefit everyone. Sadly, today most Americans seem to believe that the Supreme Court has drifted apart from what our initial goal was and what our founding fathers wanted. Which was to prevent tyranny and to have the liberty to express what is deemed a violation of our inalienable…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case
    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Supreme Court Case

    In the story, two justices wrote differing opinions about the issue. Discuss the differences between a majority opinion, a concurring opinion, and a dissenting opinion. What effect does each type of opinion have on the state of the law in…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    American Government
    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages

    American Government

    The Supreme Court case Loving v. Virginia (1967) resulted in the striking down of state laws that prohibited whites and African Americans from marrying. Mildred Loving, one of the parties in the case, issued a statement on the fortieth-anniversary of her case in which she urged that same-sex couples be allowed to marry.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Defense Of Marriage Argumentative Analysis
    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Defense Of Marriage Argumentative Analysis

    The two cases before the United States Supreme Court challenge both Congress’s traditional definition of marriage in DOMA and California’s traditional definition in its Proposition 8. The central question before the court in each…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics