Preview

Subjectivity for Lct1 Wgu

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
980 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Subjectivity for Lct1 Wgu
Task A
In Maureen Dowd’s opinion column entitled “Happily Never After?” she expresses doubt in the Supreme Courts ability to rule in a way that she feels is fair to the Gay and Lesbian community. In her view the Supreme Court Justices are out of touch with society and they will fail to provide equality for gay couples who are only seeking equal respect in the law; to be treated just like other Americans and have the legal right to marry in their “pursuit of happiness.”
Dowd begins her article with the sentence “I’m worried about the Supreme Court” (Dowd, 2013). The word “worried” reappears in the very next sentence. That, in conjunction with the words “disconcertingly disconnected” (Dowd, 2013) used to describe the Justices in the following paragraph denotes an anxious tone and a concern for the ability of the Justices. Dowd portrays the Justices as being out of touch by referring to the “The Nine” (Dowd, 2013) as being “back there in their Miss Havisham lairs” (Dowd, 2013). This reference to Charles Dickens Great Expectations character Miss Havisham, a spoiled, rich women who has separated herself from reality and knows nothing of real life and its trials, shows that Dowd views the Justices as completely out of touch with the general public and what the general public wants. This view of the Justices as being detached from the pulse of the nation may stem from her upbringing. Dowd was born, raised and attended college in Washington D.C. Her father was a police inspector on the Washington D.C. police force. In 1986, Dowd became the Washington correspondent for The New York Times (Dowd, Bio). Her harsh criticism of anything political comes from growing up in the city of politicians and then having interaction with them as a newspaper reporter. Here she saw first-hand the special treatment and arrogance of those who hold high political offices, which would include members of the Supreme Court. This insight into the attitude of the privileged



Cited: Dowd, Maureen. (2013). Happily Never After? Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/03/opinion/dowd-happily-never-after.html?ref=columnists (accessed April 3, 2013) Maureen Dowd. (2013). The Biography Channel website. Retrieved from http://www.biography.com/people/maureen-dowd-278915. (accessed April, 5 2013) Excerpt from “Happily Never After?” by Maureen Dowd I’m worried about the Supreme Court. I’m worried about how the justices can properly debate same-sex marriage when some don’t even seem to realize that most Americans use the word “gay” now instead of “homosexual”; when Chief Justice John Roberts thinks gays are merely concerned with marriage as a desirable “label,” and when Justice Samuel Alito compares gay marriage to cellphones. The Nine are back there in their Miss Havisham lairs mulling, disconcertingly disconnected. In his zeal to scare people about the “possible deleterious effect” of gay parents adopting, Justice Antonin Scalia did not seem fully cognizant that gays and lesbians can have their own biological children.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Throughout the course of American history, every generation has built upon the foundations of freedom that were constructed by their ancestors before them. During the 1920’s, women finally earned the right to vote, and in the 1960’s, blacks finally gained their hard fought equality. Our current generations task, is to strive to obtain equal rights for homosexuals so that our children and grandchildren can live in a world where they can feel free to express themselves without the fear of discrimination and hatred based chiefly on their biological predisposition to be attracted to the same gender, and so that our grandchildren will one day look at the argument against same sex marriage as we do misogyny and racism; an argument based upon ignorance, and fear. When woman were granted the right to vote, it did not alter the process of voting, and when blacks were recognized as equals, it did not threaten the equality of any other man, woman, or child. These rights awarded to women and blacks simply gave them the privileges promised to them by our nation’s forefathers. The gay community’s quest to gain these aforementioned privileges is currently being obstructed by conservative pundits who believe that the love between a man and another man, or a woman and another woman, is not adequate enough to be legally recognized, although heterosexual marriage is. William J. Bennett, former Secretary of Education under Ronald Reagan, author of several books that delve into the virtues and morals of Americans, and a former senior editor of the conservative journal, National Review, is one of those advocates against gay marriage. In Bennett’s opinion editorial which was published in the Washington Post entitled, “Against Gay Marriage”, he argues that legislation regarding the legalization of gay marriage should not be ratified because allowing marriage between homosexuals essentially…

    • 2038 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the case of Garden State Equality vs. Dow unravels into the Supreme Court hearings, there will be an indefinite variety of opinions and disputes of minds. There is room for controversy and disputes will arise. There are miss-interpretations and quotes that government officials and citizens against civil union rights have expressed and demonstrated about same-sex couples and their right to marry. This is an example of an interpretation given to describe differences in marital relationships by one of the Opinions of the Justices to the Senate, 440 Mass. at 1207, it states, “The dissimilitude between the terms “civil marriage” and “civil union” is not innocuous; it is a considered choice of…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “It is better to be hated for what you are then to be loved for what you are not,” this was said by Andre Gide and there has never been a more true statement. In this paper the topic of Obergefell V. Hodges will be discussed. Obergefell V. Hodges is the court case that talks about gay marriage. Many are against the topic, but maybe they should open their minds a little more and accept that love is love.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethics of Same Sex Marriage

    • 2913 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Same sex marriage is something that people have been fighting for rights for many decades. Andrew Koppelman (2004), celebrated journalist and author, states that “Most Americans agree with the first sentence of the proposed amendment: "Marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman." The main question this raises is whether this rule is important enough to enshrine in the Constitution” (p.4). Many Americans can agree that the first sentence of the amendment is broad and that it invalidates domestic partnership laws that allow same sex couples the rights of marriage without the name (Koppelman, 2004).…

    • 2913 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “ They [first judges] ruled that gay men are members of a legitimate minority, entitled to the special protection of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S Constitution. Equal Protection under the Law.” (p. 248)…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Same Sex Marriage

    • 4390 Words
    • 18 Pages

    The proposed legalization of same-sex marriage is one of the most significant issues in current American family law. Right now it is one of the most strongly advocated reforms discussed in law reviews, one of the most explosive political questions facing lawmakers, and one of the most provocative issues emerging before American courts. If same-sex marriage is legalized, it could be one of the most revolutionary policy decisions in the history of American family law.…

    • 4390 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The legal battle in the fight of gay rights tests the application of the fourteenth amendment’s equal protection clause that states “No state shall …deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws (CITE). Our country was founded on the principle that all people should be treated equally. Everyone should be guaranteed the same freedoms and rights no matter what gender, ethnicity or sexual orientation. One group that has historically and continuously been discriminated against is homosexuals. Author Jeff Jordan in his article “Is it Wrong to Discriminate on the Basis of Homosexuality?” defends the claim that there are situations in which it is morally permissible to discriminate against homosexuals. He contends that there is a public dilemma concerning the moral status of homosexuality and, unless a human right is at stake, then the government should refrain from favoring by publicly recognizing same-sex marriage. Jordan was unsuccessful in supporting his thesis; his argument was illogical because it lacks both clarity and empirical evidence. In another article called “Same-Sex Marriage and the Argument from Public Disagreement”, author David Boonin argues directly against Jordan’s argument, challenging the effectiveness of the claims made. While I do believe same-sex marriage should be sanctioned, Boonin’s argument did not convince me more or less on his argument, it too was unsuccessful.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay Rights Debate

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Following the 5-4 ruling, American support was on the rise with roughly two-thirds of American’s being in favor of same-sex marriage. Until the ruling many gay rights activists and support groups witnessed gay marriage bans fall, as 37 states allowed gay marriage. The two biggest questions that were brought in front of the Court that was relevant to the case were, whether states had the right to ban same-sex marriage and if states recognized marriages that were performed out of their respected…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout this semester we have learned about the processes, decision making, and what influences judges in their siding on court cases. We have learned that judges make decisions based on their political party affiliation. They also make decisions on according to their own beliefs or morals. But what makes someone fall into the political party they are in? Most say their beliefs and morals, however I do not disagree, I believe there is more to it. Taking it a step further, how or why someone believes what they do can usually be traced back to their parents, upbringing, family, and region of the United States they are from. For example take the Bush…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author is reflecting on the potential position on the then nomination of John Roberts, who is…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For years people have questioned and judged each other’s life styles whether it was a teen pregnancy, drug abuse, and especially a person’s sexuality. Everyone is entitled to an opinion but at what cost? Many people believe it’s wrong to be with someone of the opposite sex but many polls and statistics show that over the years, society has grown accustomed to different life style choices including marriages involving people of the same sex. Now it is time for politicians and the law to catch up with society. Since the 90s the community of homosexuals has stood up and raised their voices about the possibility of legalizing gay marriages. It all started with a lawsuit in Hawaii that made the issue of same sex marriages a major debate in the nation.…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For the first time in Supreme Court history, gay men and women were seen not as some powerful lobby trying to subvert America, but as the people we truly are—the sons and daughters of countless mothers and fathers, with all the weaknesses and strengths and hopes of everybody else. And what we seek is not some special place in America but merely to be a full and equal part of America, to give back to our society without being forced to lie or hide or live as…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an arrogant and hostile tone, Margaret Court writes that homosexuals should not be able to get married, that the marriage between people of the same gender is against the “fundamental Christian values”. Throughout the opinion piece, Court portrays gays as a negative mark on society, she says that “they” are taking everything that is “good” in society and “pushing it to the side”. Basically stating that homosexuals are negatively affecting “us”, she uses exclusive language to make it seem as though homosexuals are not human, as though they are different to humans, separating us (the audience) from them. Margaret Court believes that a person is not born gay, she believes that it is a “work of the flesh”. Meaning she believes that if a person grows up in a household were he/she is told that they are gay, that soon enough they will believe that they are homosexual. Margaret Court argues that if we…

    • 1166 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doma Unconstitutional

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Synopsis: The article is written by former US President Bill Clinton who in 1996 signed the Defense of Marriage Act which stated that marriage is defined as being between Man and Woman. What this means for gay couples is that they cannot enjoy the benefits that heterosexual couples have such as the ability to file taxes jointly, equal family benefits when it comes to pensions and health care and other federal statuses (Clinton 2013). While same-sex marriage is legal is several states it is not recognized by the Federal Government due to the DOMA. Bill Clinton who originally signed it states that he no longer supports it and says that “DOMA and opposition to marriage equality are vestiges of just such an unfamiliar society” (Clinton 2013). While he was signing DOMA he made sure to make the statement that it should not be taken as an act of discrimination and now 17 years later in 2013 he admits that the law itself is discriminatory and that it should be overturned in court.…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patience Vs. Virtue

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Towards the end of 2012, a widespread wave of LGBT awareness emerged as a response to a government proposition called Proposition 8. This proposition banned the LGBT community from obtaining legal marriage licenses. Those who supported the proposition were mainly religious conservatives and their churches. They believed that “God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.” The churches are known to be a political powerhouse and the LGBT community was unable to fight and oppose Proposition 8. It seemed as if the entire population was afraid of a social change that could affect their views. However, the LGBT community did not give up. They fought and took their case up to the Supreme Court. The majority of the judges declared the enactment of Proposition 8 unconstitutional. Towards the summer of 2013, the LGBT…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays