Preview

O. J. Simpson Labeling Theory

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
560 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
O. J. Simpson Labeling Theory
In 1994, one of the most famous court trials in history began. This trial was that of O.J. Simpson. The crime being prosecuted in this case was murder. O.J. Simpson is an ex NFL football star who was accused of killing his wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her alleged boyfriend, Ronald Goldman. Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman were stabbed to death and found in the Simpson’s courtyard of their house. The crime being prosecuted in the O.J. Simpson trial can be explained through self-control theory and the labeling theory. One theory that can explain the crime being prosecuted during the O.J. Simpson trial is the self-control theory. The self-control theory assumes poor parental control leads to low self-control. This thirty believes that both …show more content…
The labeling theory believes that crime is socially constructed. This theory states that there is a primary deviance, which occurs in childhood. As a result of this act of deviance, these children are labeled by the justice system. Secondary deviance occurs after this label is accepted/internalized by the child. This theory would explain O.J. Simpson’s crime as a result of society and a result of his childhood deviance. They would look at Simpson’s childhood and see that “at age 13, he joined a gang called the Persian Warriors ("O.J. Simpson Biography").” While involved in this gang he got in a fight that resulted in him having to join a Youth program. This would be considered the primary deviance. Every deviant behavior following that is a secondary deviance that is a result of him accepting the label, criminal, given to him as a child. This theory is similar to that of the self-control theory because they both see earlier childhood development as a point where deviance is rooted. They are different in the way that the labeling theory sees the start of crime as an actual act of deviance, while the self-control theory believes it started with poor parental

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Some say labelling is not a ‘theory’ because it does not give an explanation of law, but questions why we have such rules. For Labelling theorists there is no such thing as crime, as we create the laws and punishments by defining certain acts to be deviant. Deviant means to depart from usual or accepted standards. Leading theorist Kitsuse said “it is the responses of the conventional and conforming members of society which identify and interpret behaviour as deviant which sociology transforms persons into deviants”. This means that it is not the actions themselves that are crimes…

    • 4485 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Research

    • 1757 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Plaintiffs names on the case were Ronald Goldman’s family members such as his mother and father. The Defendant name was O.J. Simpson.…

    • 1757 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This is the excerpts from the October 25, 1993 9-1-1 call made by Nicole Brown Simpsons where she is frantically trying to get help from emergency responders due to the fact that O.J. broke into her house and was furiously banging on her door.…

    • 2612 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The murder trial of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman is one of the most famous cases of all time. It was nationally televised and seen by millions and millions of people. The main suspect in this trial was O.J Simpson who is a retired football star. He was accused of the murder of his ex-wife Nicole Simpson and her “friend” Ron Goldman. This case was highly controversial and many people believe that O.J did murder both of them even though he was found not-guilty. This case had a lot of evidence including forms of forensic evidence.…

    • 1999 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Oj Simpson Research Paper

    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages

    On June 12, 1994 the Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman were murdered. The location was Nicole Brown Simpsons condominium on Bundy Drive Los Angeles, California. It is believed the murders occurred sometime after ten PM. Around midnight Nicole’s dog started howling and attracted the attention of a neighbor. The neighbor discovered the bodies of Nicole and Ronald. Ronald Goldman was found with multiple stab wounds including a stab wound in the back of his neck. Nicole was found with a stab wound to the back of the neck similar to Ronald’s. Nicole had her throat slit and that was the wound that ended her life. The police questioned O.J on his whereabouts during the murders. The police noticed a suspicious gash on his hand. At first he claimed…

    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The blood found outside the house was O.J,’s most likely from his hand wound. Once investigators were able to get inside of his Bronco the next day they found the blood inside was a mixture of Ron and Nicole’s blood. The missing glove was also found at his house along with a bloody sock containing Nicole’s blood. The forensic evidence puts O.J. at the scene and shows that he was the murderer.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oj Simpson Criminal Trial

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The 1995 criminal trial of O. J. Simpson for the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman has been called "a great trash novel come to life,".No one can deny the pull it had on the American public and the fans of the great O.J. Simpson. During the early reports of the murder of the wife of the ex-football star, and the cunning , head turning sports announcer had not caught people's full attention, Simpson's surreal Bronco ride on the day of his arrest most definitly did. Police accumulated enough evidence against Simpson to indicate that he was guilt of the murders and they sought and obtained a warrant for his arrest. But there was an agreement worked out with Simpson's attorney, Robert Shapiro that Simpson was to turn himself in…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    W4A1

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Labeling theory is based on the idea that behaviors are deviant only when society labels them as deviant. As such, conforming members of society, who interpret certain behaviors as deviant and then attach this label to individuals, determine the distinction between deviance and non-deviance.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    OJ Simpson Essay

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    O.J's case consisted of a man named O.J Simpson who was said to have viciously slashed the throats of his wife, Nicole Brown, and a man named Ronald Goldman. This event took place in June 22, 1994 and the casualties that it contained are still very much spoken about today. O.J Simpson was said to have been violent in the past, therefore when the two bodies were found, police did not hesitate to confront Mr. Simpson. Police showed up in his home and certain evidence was found. Mr. Simpson officially became a suspect but because of some problems with how the evidence was found, he was claimed "not guilty".…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Labelling Theory

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Labelling theory addresses a larger definition of crime, referring not only to illegal conduct or actions but much rather to deviant behaviour in general. Deviance is seen as a quality attributed to a certain act by those who witness it directly or indirectly and deem it immoral and wrong. Behaviours acquire the label of being deviant by social interaction and maintain it by social learning. This new approach is in contradiction with the former views of crime as inherent to the action or behaviour and in some cases excusable by the circumstances such as anomie or social strain, which assume homogenous norms and equal responses or punishments to all those guilty.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stereotyping Eth/125

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Labeling Theory; is a sociological theory that tries to explain why certain people are regarded as deviants while others who engage in the same behavior are not. (Schaefer, 2012)…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Howard Becker is a sociologist that is often credited with the development of the labelling theory. However the origins of this theory can be traced back to sociologists at the beginning of the twentieth century who made invaluable contributions to the creation of the “labelling” concept. The first was Charles Cooley who wrote “Human Nature and the Social Order” in 1902, in which he introduced the term the “looking glass self”. This idea suggests that an individual will respond to society based on how the individual thinks society perceives them. Another was Frank Tannenbaum (1938) who studied juvenile participation in street gangs. He argued that when society defines certain behaviour as deviant, a “tag” is then placed upon the individual that displayed the deviant behaviour, thus causing further deviant / criminal behaviour. Although Cooley and Tannenbaum influenced Becker it was the much later influence of Edwin Lamert that truly led the way. Lemert was, by many of his peers, credited with introduction of the ‘original’ version of the labelling theory. In Lemert’s 1951 publication, “Social Pathology” he states that primary deviance is the original offence that causes a figure in authority to “label” the offender as deviant. Furthermore he states that if said offender accepts the deviant “label” offered to them, this will result in further deviance, known as secondary deviance. This may then lead to a “self- fulfilling prophecy” causing the individual to live up to their deviant label.…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Oj Simpson Trial

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The O.J. Simpson trial was one of the most recognizable cases in American history. It went on for nine months. There were 11 lawyers representing the O.J. and 25 working around the clock for the largest prosecutor's office in the country. The opinion of the Jury was for the defense, not guilty. I agree with them. It would have been crazy if O.J. was convicted because the evidence was not properly handled or accounted for, the main police officer handling the case was a racist man and the defendant was black. And people who were testifying on the prosecutor's defense were proven to be lying under oath.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When watching the video some of the causal factors that were noticed were that of a mother having a restraining order against her on again of again boyfriend. The boyfriend, who was also the father of a three year old boy that was in the home, was trying to get in through a window. When the female speaker called 911 she informed them that there was a restraining order in affect against the suspect. Even though at this time there were no signs of domestic violence taking place, the suspect had committed them before and that is the reason for the restraining order. Also, in the video a speaker named Hugh Downs talked about OJ Simpsons children and if they had witnessed any abuse happening towards their mother by the hands of their father. One child expressed how her parents are always fighting, mainly when she is in her bedroom. This little girl also was afraid that her father would kill her mother and then…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays