Preview

New Charges In Plato's Apology

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1096 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
New Charges In Plato's Apology
In Plato's Apology, Socrates a philosopher is standing trial for charges that are not easily proven. Socrates has two sets of charges brought against him the “old” charges that Socrates claims that have been talked about for a very long time “there are many of these accusers, and they have been accusing me for a long time now.”(Plato 18c) His second set of charges known as the “new’ charges represent more straight forward claims. New charges called onto Socrates is that he is guilty of corrupting the youth as well as not believing in the gods in which the city chooses to believe in. Despite accusation for many of these false crimes Socrates is allowed a chance to argue his position against his accusers, which is what Socrates does best. However …show more content…
In his first argument in regards of him corrupting the youth Socrates says “But the one who makes them better-come, tell them and reveal to them who it is.” (Plato 24d) Meletus states that everyone who isn't Socrates has been only beneficial to the youth. Socrates proves this to be untrue using a horse trainer analogy that says only horse trainers can improve a horses behavior and such should be applied to the youth how could someone with no specialization in teaching the youth actually help the youth which disproves Meletus first accusation that everyone helps the youth besides Socrates. Socrates next confronts the charge in which he is detrimental to society. Meletus still on the stand gets asked by Socrates how he can be detrimental to society if he himself actually is apart of society. Why would he voluntary hurt himself as he regards this as foolish as no person in there right mind would cause harm to themselves. Socrates then goes on to point out one who unintentionally does harm as Meletus suggested should be taught on how to not do harm instead of just being punished for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Socrates’ argument for Meletus, Anytus and Lycon. Meletus Youth Meletus, let me ask a question of you. Do you think a great deal of improvement of the youth? Tell me then, who is their improver; as you have taken the pains to discover their corrupter.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On pages 35-37 of Plato’s philosophical dialogue “Apology” (389 BCE), Socrates argues that if he is wise it’s because he, unlike others, knows that he is not wise and he knows that people can not know when they think they know. In the beginning of the dialogue socrates sets up the question on why he is in trouble with the court(for corrupting the youth) and where did his reputation come from. He explains to the court that the oracle pronounced him as being the most wise and that no one else was wiser than him. Being confused on why the Gods would say this, Socrates explains the stories to the court on how he ventured out to search for wiser man to prove the oracle wrong but along the way he realizes that the politicians, poets, and artisans…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates, in his conviction from the Athenian jury, was both innocent and guilty as charged. In Plato's Five Dialogues, accounts of events ranging from just prior to Socrates' entry into the courthouse up until his mouthful of hemlock, both points are represented. Socrates' in dealing with moral law was not guilty of the crimes he was accused of by Meletus. Socrates was only guilty as charged because his peers had concluded him as such. The laws didn't find Socrates guilty; Socrates was guilty because his jurors enforced the laws. The law couldn't enforce itself. Socrates was accused of corrupting Athens' youth, not believing in the gods of the city and creating his own gods. In the Euthyphro, Socrates defends himself against the blasphemous charges outside the courthouse to a priest…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death is one of the most discussed topics that has always risen a lot of doubt and concerns . Many philosophers and writers, through the centuries, have tried to find a definition or a reason for this mysterious and inevitable event. Analyzing Plato’s Apology, he seemed to have a positive view about death. He claimed that death is a “state of nothingness and utter unconsciousness”; in fact, he compared death with the act of sleeping. But since death is more deep and irreversible, humans cannot be bothered by dreams or thought because they’re dead, whereas this could happen while they’re sleeping. So death is a state of relaxing for the soul and for this motivation he considered death as a conquer for human’s life. He also pointed out another…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first reason Socrates believed that his death would be more harmful on the Athenian people because the children would lose their teacher. The children looked up to Socrates as their role model, they enjoyed watching him examine people and proving them unwise when they think that they are wise. They learnt from his philosophizing. Socrates predicted that his execution would make the children of Athens rebel. During the trial, he used the analogy of horses and horse trainers in comparison to teaching the children. He stated that not just anyone can train a horse; only an expert could do so. Most people would have a negative effect on the horses if they tried to train them. Therefore, saying that the same goes for children, it would take someone with expertise to better the children’s minds. Without an appropriate mentor the children would never learn as they age into adulthood which would affect Athens for years to come.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Apology by Plato, Socrates defends himself against the accusations claiming that he corrupts the youth with his teachings. As a Philosopher, or in the context of the text, a juror, or a judge , it is important think critically and logically when examining arguments from both sides of the conflict. One of Socrates’ arguments against the charges brought upon him for corrupting the youth is this: “For if I am really corrupting the youth, and have corrupted some of them already, those of them who have grown up and have become sensible that I gave them bad advice in the days of their youth should come forward as accusers and take their revenge” (Plato). Here, Socrates is making a valid and sound argument refuting his accusations, and although there could be other factors that make his argument false, the argument still resonates with me as sound.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin, Socrates did not believe in the same gods as Athens, the easiest of his convictions to prove because of his Apology. In his plea, Socrates distracts the jury with stories of disbelievers. As the defense begins, he does not say that he does believe or disbelieve in the gods of Athens, since the easiest answer for an innocent man is “I did not do it.” Instead, he takes a route of disapproval and disbelief that this charge was brought up against him, “Socrates does injustice by not believing in gods, but believing in gods (p.77 27a),” he says in a mocking manner that is meant to make the jury question themselves. He further twists and turns the accusation by saying similar things; is there such thing as one who “believes… in human matters but not humans,” “not believing… in horse matters but believing in horses,” and “not believing in flute players, but believes in flute matter (p.77, 27a-b)?” To finish his point, he makes a final example of the atrocity of the charge against him, “Is there anyone who believes that there are daimonic matters, but does not believe in daimons (p.77, 27c)?” This argument…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates’ starts his defense by stating that all he will do is speak the truth and not waste time telling stories. “So they, as I say, have said little or nothing true, while from me you will hear the whole truth—but by Zeus, men of Athens, not beautifully spoken speeches like theirs” (46). He also does not refer to the people who brought the charges on him by name, only by “accusers”. Socrates also states later that he knows he is not well liked in the city because he has trapped nearly everyone, including most of the jury in a philosophical conundrum. For me the fact that Socrates does not know who is accusers are and that he is being…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Platos Apology

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages

    People are accused all over the world for crimes they are not guilty of. In the text “Platos Apology” Socrates is accused of a crime which is slander. Socrates believes that teaching is not crime and he shouldn't be prosecuted for such an act.Teaching is not a crime. How can he be accused of something that isn't wrong in society?…

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    24c, of Apology, written by Plato about Socrates’ trial, starts off with Meletus accusing Socrates of corrupting the youth of Athens. Socrates claims that if either of them is doing wrong it is Meletus because he involves himself in things that he does not really interested in or cares about. Socrates proves that Meletus is not concerned about the youth and also that he himslef is not a corrupter of the youth by asking Meletus a number of questions along with questions he answers himself. First he asks who would be the good influence for the youth, since he is considered to be the only corrupter. Meletus has no answer, to which Socrates replies “Do you see, Meletus, that you are silent and cannot tell? And yet does it not seem to you disgraceful and a sufficient proof of what I say, that you have never cared about it?” (24d). Socrates proves that Meletus has not even given thought to his accusations and to the youth in general. Socrates continues to ask for an answer and Meletus claims the laws make the youth better, but Socrates does not accept this answer because he asked who makes them better not what. Meletus claims that the judges, senators, and assemblymen all improve the youth of Athens, implying that Socrates is the only person of corruption to the youth. So…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Argument in the Apology

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The main argument in The Apology by famous ancient Greek philosopher Plato is whether, notorious speaker and philosopher Socrates is corrupting the youth by preaching ungodly theories and teaching them unlawful ideas that do harm to individuals and society. In his words Socrates quoted the prosecution's accusation against him: "Socrates is guilty of corrupting the minds of the young, and of believing in supernatural things of his own invention instead of the gods recognized by the state." 1 Further Socrates consistently introduces tediously compiled number of examples to provide valid and sound arguments to prove that he is innocent of the charges brought up against him to the court.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Socrates in his defense of the accusations brought onto him, argues on several different topics that disprove any accusations that Meletus brought to the trial. His approach at defending himself through arguments was a bold move, and as we know from reading the text, the jury still finds him guilty regardless of this strategy that backfired on him. One argument that stuck out was how he did not corrupt the youth, but if he did it was unknowingly, which does not deserve punishment. His first premise is that no one intentionally causes harm, and from that his second premise is he did not intentionally mean to corrupt the people if he did. Thus leading to the fact that he should not be punished for an act…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Apology was written by Plato, and set in the courtroom of Socrates ' trial. Socrates acts as the speaker addressing the jury, though there is one scene where he goes into a dialogue with Meletus. The defense begins with a line that sets the mood for the rest of his speech: "I don 't know, men of Athens, how you were affected by my accusers. I was almost carried away by them, they spoke so persuasively. And yet almost nothing they said is true." (17a) The beginning compares Socrates to the Sophists, arguing there is a difference between what is "truth" and what is "persuasion". He makes a strong point that persuading someone does not constitute it is true. Rather, he will address the rest of his defense in his own manner, rather than in "elegant language" (17c) in order to bring out the "truth".…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Platos Apology

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plato’s Apology is a narrative of the famous speech of Socrates that is made during his trial. Instead of apologizing, Socrates attempts to defend himself and his actions. He is put on trial due to his accusations of corrupting Athens, not acknowledging the same gods as the state, and creating new gods. During his dialogue, Socrates remains very calm and speaks with honesty. He focuses on what is said rather than his manner of speech.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Horse Essay

    • 672 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The passage starts off by Socrates going toward the new accusers. He reminds them of what they accused him of corrupting the young people and believing in supernatural phenomena. He then calls on Meletus and cross examines him. He then asks Meletus that if he is a bad influence, what a good one is. Meletus responds that laws make people good. Socrates then asks him to clarify which people have this good influence. Meletus first asserts that the jurymen are responsible for knowing the laws, and then accepts both the councilors and members of the assembly as equally good influences. Also, because the assembly is all males, Meletus claims that every Male in Athens has a positive influence on the youth besides Socrates. Socrates then uses his nowfamous analogy of horses.…

    • 672 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays