Preview

Negligent Misstatement

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2204 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Negligent Misstatement
INTRODUCTION Law of tort dominates civil conduct in all aspects of life and numerous of violations of duties are all distinctly set. It provides remedies for certain civil wrongs that have not been arisen from the contractual duties. Under tort law, whether it is an intentional act or accident, the injured victim (plaintiff) may be capable to recover damages from the person that liable for the harmed caused (defendant). Negligence is the most significant and developed category of tort in terms of money and varied of cases involved. It believes that the plaintiff should bear their own adversities unless there is a proof shows that the defendant owes of duty to comply with ordinary care and skill. There are few elements have to be shown if the claimant wish to succeed in compensation which is the existence and breach of a duty of care, losses or damages must be resulted from the reliance on that breach, and lastly is to determine whether the losses were an equitably foreseeable consequence of the defendant’s actions.

CONTENTS Negligent misstatement refers to a representation of fact that been carelessly made, which is relied on the plaintiff to their advantages (O’Riordan, 2007, p.1). In 1964, the tort of negligent misstatement has been established and it has gained more recognition in this decades. It covers opinions and reality statements made by negligence. However, the tort had lead to certain level of floodgate concerns in the early century and today the courts are still less well embrace its liability. In the present day setup, accountants have been regarded as prominence role. They inspect mistreats and irregularities of the company’s financial aspects and protect the benefits of the stakeholders and investors. When the accountants or auditors form a contractual relationship with their potential clients, there are many debatable legal area emerge in respect of the people who possible rely on the company reports made or advices provided in a non



Bibliography: • Cooke, J. 1992. Law of Tort. Harlow: Pearson Longman. • Cooke, J. 2003. Law of Tort. 6th ed. Harlow: Pearson Longman. • Jones, M.A. 1996. Torts. 5th ed. Great Britain: Blackstone Press Limited. • Gillies, P. 2004. Business Law. 12th ed. Sydney: The Federation Press. • Pannett, A. 1997. Law of Torts. 8th ed. London: Pitman Publishing • O’Riordan, J. 2007. Negligent Misstatement - Dillon Eustace Solicitors. Viewed 25 April 2011. Available from: • Katter, N.A. The Ambit OF Liability of Professionals for Negligent Advice or Information: The Law in Great Britain and Australia. Viewed 25 April 2011. Available from: < http://www.nigerianlawguru.com/articles/torts/NEGLIGENT%20MISSTATEMENTS.pdf> • Price, N. 2003. The Approach of New Zealand Courts to Negligent Misstatement: Rationalising Price Waterhouse v Kwan and R.M. Turton & Co Ltd (In Liquidation) v Kerslake and Partners. Viewed 26 April 2011. Available from: < http://www.austlii.edu.au/nz/journals/AukULRev/2003/7.html> • Turner, C. 1999. The Law of Tort. Viewed 26 April 2011. Available from: < http://www.unisanet.unisa.edu.au/RickSarre/criterion%203-05/topic%208.pdf>

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Shaw V Thomas

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages

    11.45 Section 48(3) of the Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic) attempts to give some guidance on the meaning of…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Dustin Soldano v. Howard O’Daniels case models the common dispute between negligence and a party’s responsibility in an event. Likewise, chapter 1 of the Legal Environment textbook features Kuehn v. Pub Zone, a case that demonstrates a different scenario but the same battle of negligence and liability. The commonalities between the two cases support one another in the demonstration of the judges’ decisions as well as contribute to later common law.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jacobsen vs Nike

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Tort Law - Law of Negligence: It involves inadvertent or unintentionally careless conduct causing injury or damage to another person or his property. Four required elements or ingredients must be established by the plaintiff to succeed in a negligence action. Failure to establish any one of these four will lead to dismissal of the plaintiff’s action.1…

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 6

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Under the traditional choice-of-law rule of lex loci delicti (The law of the place where a wrong was committed.), what conduct constitutes contributory negligence is a question of substantive law which is governed by the law of the state where the injury occurred. Thus, whether contributory negligence of the plaintiff precludes recovery in whole or in part in a negligence action is to be settled by the law of the place of the wrong. A comparative negligence statute likewise is part of the substantive law of the state, and therefore, the effect of the plaintiff's comparative negligence also will be determined by the law of the jurisdiction in which the wrong occurred.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of the fifteen-year-old Rob Jr., the Church of Devine Light was at fault will be held responsible for the actions of Tom Marsden, an employee of the church, under strict liability. Rob’s parents, Rob Sr. and Bunny, could file charges against Tom Marsden and the Church of Devine Light for negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and false imprisonment.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tabet Vs Gett Case Study

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The case concerned an appeal of a medical negligence case regarding a child who was misdiagnosed until a CT scan revealed that she, in fact, had a brain tumour . The treating physician was then subsequently sued on the basis that since the physician had not performed the CT scan when the child had been misdiagnosed . Therefore the child had lost the chance to have the brain tumour treated before the sustaining of permanent brain damage . At first instance, the case succeeded but failed on appeal . Additionally, the High Court also rejected the claim, on the basis that there were no policy reasons that would allow for recovery of damages based on a less than even chance of a better medical outcome . In spite of this, the High Court did not eliminate the possibility that a claim in a future medical case above the purported 50% standard would be allowed . Meanwhile, the case of Tabet v Gett (2010) demonstrates that patients that suffer as a result of medical negligence in Australia will face large injustice issues specifically in cases of late diagnosis. Therefore, it is only fitting to highlight the High Court’s stance on commercial chances where the High Court rejected the appellant’s argument that the fact that Australia already recognises loss of chance in commercial cases means that loss…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Negligence consists of four different elements: duty, breach, causation, and damages. In order to collect damages for the harm done the claimant must prove several things: the duty of care one owes to another, the standard of care expected by one from another, breach of the duty of care, and damage(s) either physical, emotional or monetary. In…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Applied Management Project

    • 13570 Words
    • 55 Pages

    17. Tsang (1999), “Law society Gazette-Focus ' '. Available at www.lawgazette.co.uk/archives/1999-10-08/00000012.html, (Accessed: 27th July, 2010)…

    • 13570 Words
    • 55 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Five elements are required to establish a prima facie case of negligence: the existence of a legal duty to exercise reasonable care; a failure to exercise reasonable care; cause in fact of physical harm by the negligent conduct; physical harm in the form of actual damages; and proximate cause, a showing that the harm is within the scope of liability. Negligence is an actionable tort. This means that if one person's carelessness causes another personal injury, the injured party may sue to recover damages (money) for his or her injuries. The idea that a person can sue for negligence is a relatively new phenomenon, only about a century old.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Clinical Negligence Claims

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Moreover, informing patients of the `unintended or unexpected’ harm may be perceived as admitting liability, thus led to a complaint or litigation. Therefore, medical professional may still be reluctant to report errors or disclose such information to patients as the fear of dispute and embarrassment would remain.…

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Lo Surdo, A. (2008) The latest word from the High Court on vicarious liability, LAW SOCIETY JOURNAL, September 45 (8), pp.64-65.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Romeo and Juliet

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are two major classifications of a tort, intentional and negligent. Intentional torts are deliberate acts of violation of another’s rights. Negligent torts are not deliberate and are the result of omission and commission of an act. Malpractice is when a professional either fails to act in a reasonable and prudent manner and caused harm to the patient or did what a reasonable person would not have done and caused harm to a patient.…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Evaluating Teachers

    • 3164 Words
    • 13 Pages

    I write this letter to completely reassure you that we are taking the concerns you brought up with the utmost seriousness that they deserve. As a matter of fact, we have investigated the matter the last couple of days to ascertain the facts and events of what happened in Ms. Paulson’s Computer Technology Class on Monday during the third period. There were 27 students present that day alongside Ms. Paulson, and we have conducted interviews with some of them individually in order to get to the bottom of this issue. While it is certain that it was one of the students who momentarily put the pictures in question on the projector, it is also without a doubt our goal to never have to expose our students to any such material; and the adults in our staff certainly are expected to uphold their responsibility of keeping a safe environment for every child under our care, be it from harm of a physical or mental nature.…

    • 3164 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Understanding Tort Law

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The tort system was created to summarize compensation methods and amounts for wrongs and harms committed by one party to another. Tort law, in essence, aims to offer the damaged party a chance to restore their state back to its point of origin; in other words, the point of tort law is to place a financial obligation on an individual who causes harm to another party. The decision to put a cap on damages is not just harmful, but also makes it very difficult to seek lawful judgment in the court of law. Here is few issues show ultimately why putting a cap on damages is not a desirable measure in resolving problems contained within the tort law.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pure Economic Loss

    • 6515 Words
    • 27 Pages

    difficulty with was that of the House of Lords in 2006 in the case of Law…

    • 6515 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics