Negative Effects Of Libertarianism

Prompt: One alleged negative feature of libertarianism is that it denies determinism. Is this a genuine or spurious negative feature of libertarianism?
When looking to determine how humans make decisions and why they chose to act certain ways over others, one theory is libertarianism. Libertarianism uses free thinking as the sole idea behind free will. Other theories about how humans make decisions are hard determinism and soft determinism. Hard determinism describes the decision-making process based solely on determinism and not free will; whereas, soft determinism is uses both determinism and free will as its support. These other theories about free will both use the idea of determinism as a main source of support for decision-making. Not using determinism is a spurious negative of the theory of libertarianism, because it does not allow prior factors to have any impact on decision-making.
Other theories use determinism as support; however, using free will by itself provides a clear and accurate depiction of how decisions are made. The libertarian perspective proves that free will exists and the only cause for actions is choosing to commit the action. The theory does not leave room for prior factors, which leave people wondering what exactly the prior factors
Libertarianism supports free will as a decision-making tool. The theory also argues that free will is not compatible with determinism; therefore, determinism is false. Believing free will to be true means that every decision made by an individual is made with no restraints. The decision maker is not bound by any prior factors. Determinism provides reasons for actions based on prior factors, more specifically internal and external factors. In the light of determinism, every action is based upon things that have happened previously that lead to the decision being