Should Medical Marijuana Be a Medical Option?
January 27, 2013
In the debate over medical marijuana, the primary justification advanced by its supporters is that marijuana use, especially by terminally ill patients, diminishes their "suffering from unnecessary chronic and unbearable pain that persists until death." Currently, Washington D.C. and eighteen states have approved and finalized medical marijuana rules: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. Additionally, New York, Illinois, South Dakota, and Kansas are in the process of considering medical marijuana laws. Under the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, marijuana remains a Schedule I drug; meaning possession of it is still illegal and may only be utilized for research purposes. Although all patients should have the right to treatment, rights, generally, must be considered within the context of national policy. Though the government has remained to disagree, there's evidence that clearly shows that marijuana has been accepted as capable of relieving the distress of great numbers of very ill people, and doing so with safety under medical supervision. There are many opposing arguments with great points about the use of marijuana for medical use, but no hard evidence to back up their opinions. . It would be unreasonable, arbitrary and capricious for DEA to continue to stand between those sufferers and the benefits of this substance in light of the evidence already found.
Narrative on a Research Topic Essay Draft
I have been around marijuana users all of my life, most of which who are terminally ill and need it to function well. Before any of them could get their medical license to purchase cannabis, they were always so paranoid of getting caught with possession. As I got older,...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document