Preview

Napoleon Nationalism Source Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1236 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Napoleon Nationalism Source Analysis
Nationalism is the ideology of others when they view their group. The sense of nationalism can vary between the different personalities of society. Examples of this are people who are patriotic meaning that they freely express their loyalty and pride about their group to the rest of the population. Some certain individuals can express a different perspective and can be shown to lack interest and are unmotivated about their nation. The sources that I will be explaining show different views of nationalism and the various ways they believe an ideal nation should interact and operate.

In the first source, a quote from Ernest Renan, he describes a nation as a spiritual principle. He believes that having common glories in the past, similar will
…show more content…
The nationalist perspective of King Louis XIV is that the head of the country is the nation and for society to prosper the people have to be willing to serve and follow the leader’s will. The source’s perspective can be shown throughout history by the beliefs and values he had during his reign in France. The source believed in the uses of a social hierarchy and the absolute monarch. The social hierarchy benefited the people who were part of the Roman Catholic Clergy or nobility. These people received privileges and were not required to pay taxes. The rest of the population had a difficult and challenging way of living. They were required to serve the king by paying taxes which lead to poor living conditions, in which some died from starvation. The absolute monarch allowed all the power in France to be consolidated in the hands of the king. This allowed for King Louis XIV to be the main voice in France and gave the power to decide how the country will operate. These ideals were the main contributions to start of the French Revolution, many people felt that they deserved better rights which lead the nation members to revolt and seek a better constitution. The source would disagree with J.D Vance’s idea to bridge the gap between the rich and poor. King Louis XIV would believe that he should not have to …show more content…
The point of view of sources five and one represent the revolutionaries and the National Assembly. They believed that all men should be treated equally and shared a similar ideology of how their country should be run and rules set out for the French people. The perspective of source three was the reason behind the revolt and explains King Louis’s position during the revolution. The two sources that are ideal for a republic or democratic country are sources one and five, they show how a nation can be united by accepting each other, by sharing a constitution and having different beliefs in society. This allows people to have a say when coming up with the decision for a country. The source that can represent a dictatorship is source three because it embodies a nation as an individual and not as a people. A dictatorship describes the rule of a country to be in possession of one ruler and the leader is the one that comes up with the decisions for the country. The third source would disagree to concepts such as equality and multiculturalism, while the first and fifth source would embrace these concepts and allow the voices of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Nationalism- The feeling of unity and identity that binds together people. The English had strong nationalism after winning the war.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Louis XIV was a man of strength and courage with many ambitions that he was fully determined to achieve. He dedicated most of his rule taking steps to accomplish the goal of “one king, one law, one faith” for the country of France. By one king he aimed for the ruler to have supreme power over armies, government bureaucracy, and culture. This would eventually lead to the overall influence of the French upon other countries and their kings. By way of one law he aspired for the nobles to no longer rule over separate states but for one government with supreme power. King Louis had a desire for an absolute monarchy. As a result he would not be legally bound by any institutions or other persons in the country. This inclination was not easily met or as successful as he had hoped. Louis XIV sought religious unity between the French people, one faith. To do this he revoked the Edict of Nantes. King Louis XIV did not achieve his entire goal to the extent which he had anticipated but overall he was victorious, leaving a huge impact and influence on the French society and Europe as a whole.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The years following the War of 1812 became known as the “era of good feelings”. During this time you see the expansion of nationalism within the United States. It started mainly in the 1816 shortly before Monroe took office, and lasted until the end of his Presidency in the year of 1824. Before the “era of good feelings” there were certain events taking place that will lead up to this era. The first of these is the acquired land of the Louisiana Purchase from the French. Through this the United States was able to double its land. The gained independence from this purchase was able to keep other countries father away from the US’s boundaries and was able to separate the United States even more. Another event that led up to the Era of Good Feelings was the Embargo Act of 1807. The Embargo Act cut off trade with Britain to try to prove that the U.S. could be interdependent amongst them. Although this proving to be a huge mistake for the U.S. it gave many of the citizens the spirit of nationalism. One of the greatest events however, that led up to the era was the War of 1812. The Americans were upset with the British amidst their interception of American ships and declared war on the British. It was after this war ended that the true spirit of nationalism was expressed in the nation. This was the second time that the United States had faced Britain and had not loss. Nationalism began to take off which sparked the innovations of new things within the country.…

    • 1791 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    An Absolute Monarchy was a new concept to the people of France during the 1600’s. Other forms of government were failing from lack of control, so the people of France turned to an Absolute Monarch, named Louis XIV. The only problem with Louis was that he was self-centered, and did not care a whole lot about governing his kingdom. He was more concerned with making himself looking good, and even went as far to call himself the “Sun God.” As a result, the French common people lived very rough lives, due to the neglect of their king. It was not an easy life for the French people under King Louis XIV’s rule, and it was not made better by his view on governing. This is shown through his lack of genuine care for his people, over taxation, and wars of the time.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The French Revolution was a quest for liberty, and centered on people who wanted their freedom. They wanted to be treated as equal participants in the community, not as slaves for the royals or nobles. The peasants who represents more than 90% of France’s population, were working for their own families and everyone else as they paid much more in taxes. Brotherhood was the way of everyone coming together as one. Hubris is excessive pride in one’s self, people during the French Revolution did not want to admit they were wrong for what they were doing and that they did not want less entitlement then they had. Fiscal irresponsibility was brought on by the higher debts, and taxes were raised so the government could get out of the finical hole they were in. The democracy was a new construction of power where the politics were giving everyone the chance to be heard and to be equal. Technology at the beginning of the French Revolution was lacking, but as it continued throughout the years it became a resource at war.…

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nationalism- built on “we”, common culture, history and language, defines us as a nation, also defined in who we are NOT, opposition, contradistinction to others…

    • 3156 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nationalism is the patriotic feeling of being in a certain country. The first time nationalism was brought to Europe was commonly known when Machiavelli advocated for national political federation. This then brought upon mercantilism. An example of nationalism in the 1800s is the ruling of Otto Von Bismarck, where he brought a new type of conservative. Von Bismarck brought nationalism by trying to make Germany as powerful as possible.…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism is from the people. Patriotism is the act of one individual for their country. When given these two points, we can clearly believe that one is part of the other. Faith within the nationalism can cause things like hatred within the nations, like the quote from the source; “Nationalism, when hate for people other than your own comes first.” When nationalism is one’s identity, and a part of one’s nation, the way an individual thinks about other countries, becomes the way they treat the other countries. Even though nationalism is an aspiration common to the whole of a nation, patriotism is the devoted love, support, and defence of one’s country/nation. The way one individual acts can either be patriotic, or nationalistic. Even stronger than nationalism, is the ability to prevail. This ability is often associated with patriotism. One should embrace the perspective on nationalism reflected in “Patriotism is when love of your own people comes first; nationalism, when hate for people other than your own comes first” as it applies to the First World War in 1914.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Imperialism In Germany

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Through much of the nineteenth century nationalism was used as tool in political propaganda. Nationalism is the extreme patriotism or love for one’s country. In the past few centuries nationalism has been used a justification for many wars and genocides. Nationalism has also been used to fuel the desire for imperialism. Imperialism is when one country takes over another.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism can be good and bad. One major outcome of Nationalism are revolutions, they are defined as changes in areas of a culture, they always involve tremendous shifts in the way things are traditionally carried…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism is the loyalty and pride people feel for their country. In the years before 1914, nationalism would appear in the form of press or culture. In many European countries, the newspaper pages were packed full of rumors and rousing stories about other countries. The countries reading these papers then had the right to believe that their country was fair and without blame. The newspapers also carried rumors about the schemes and aggressiveness of the surrounding countries.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism—The feeling of pride in one’s country. (Patriotism) The colonist began to feel like a separate country from Great Britain and began to take pride in calling themselves Americans instead of British citizens.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon's Nationalism

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nationalism played a large role in Napoleon's rule of France, and the other countries that he had conquered, which had both negative and positive effects on the likelihood of his rule beginning and continuing.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On October 24th, 1995, two of the best-known scholars of nationalism participated in what has now become known as the “Warwick Debate on Nationalism” under the host of Edward Mortimer at the Warwick University. Each respected speaker presented thoughts and approaches to the study of nationalism that have laid the foundation for two separate, yet prevalent suppositions toward nationalism: Anthony Smith’s primordial approach and Ernest Gellner’s modernist theory.…

    • 2386 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, we have to understand what is cultural nationalism; cultural nationalism is actually a small part of nationalism, which we can simply understand as culture plus nationalism. Culture is a term that has various meanings (Culture, 2010), which most commonly used in three basic senses: excellence of taste in the fine arts and humanities; integrated pattern of human knowledge, belief and behavior; and set of shared attitudes, values, goals, and practices that characterizes an institution, organization or group. Nationalism involves a strong identification of a group of individuals with a political entity defined in national terms (Nationalism, 2010). It is generally describe either as an attitude of you when you care about your national identity or the action when you are seeking for the self-determination of your nation. It simply describe as people look at the importance of their state above everything. In addition, nationalism expresses when people are identifying their national culture with a negative view of other races or cultures. Cultural nationalism can be explained as what unites individuals together, it could be common language and ethnic identity; for example: two different nations which share the same language and same type of music.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays