Preview

My Response to Mccloskey's "On Being an Atheist"

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2632 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
My Response to Mccloskey's "On Being an Atheist"
My response to McCloskey’s "On Being an Atheist."

The paper written by McCloskey is nothing more than an Atheists attempt to justify his atheistic ideas and at no time should ever be taken by any other person as anything more than one man’s opinions which are based completely upon speculative ideas. Throughout this paper, I read statements like, “theists feel…”,” Most theists believe…”, “They do not think…”, and “Most theists conclude…”; however, the person giving these tidbits is only one person, as opposed to the “most” which he seems to speak for, and he is no more a “theist”, than the “man in the moon”. I would be more inclined to over look his made-up statistics, had a single one of his claims lined up with my theistic ideas; however, every time he claimed to know how the “theists” think or feel, it turned out to be the opposite of my theistic point of view. The very basis for this fallacy can be tied to a statement in McCloskey’s opening sentence: “…the grounds upon which theists base their belief in God…” In this statement, McCloskey claims to know why theists believe in God. My next claim is pure speculation; however, if I were to ask every person in my church congregation, “why do you believe in God”, I seriously doubt anyone would respond with the cosmological argument or the teleological argument.

Another problem I found in his philosophy was, throughout his writing, McCloskey talks about how Christians use arguments as “proofs”; however, they are not proofs but merely ideas and arguments that when looked at as a whole, seem to give support to a claim. Since they do not definitively establish a case for God, McCloskey says these arguments should be abandoned. Again, McCloskey seems to think that he knows the inner mind of “most” theistic people and claims that we hold certain ideas or theories as proof. I know quite a few theists; however, I can’t recall ever hearing a single one saying that they have definitive proof of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The weaknesses of the Ontological Argument give support to Atheism. Discuss this claim (12 marks)…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rowe begins his paper by distinguishing two types of theists as well as two types of atheists. He makes a distinction between broad and narrow forms of each particular position. For Rowe a broad theist is someone who believes in a divine being while a narrow theist is someone who believes in an omniscient, omnipotent, eternal, supremely good, being who created of the world (335). The distinctions for an atheist are similar. A broad atheist is someone who denies the existence of a divine being while a narrow atheist is someone who denies the existence of an omniscient, omnipotent, eternal, supremely good, being who created of the world. In Rowe 's paper these distinctions are important because he only addresses the narrow versions of each.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As we explore the teleological argument’s logical and illogical points, we will be attempting to discuss the four forms of the teleological argument: atheistic physicalism, theistic evolution, progressive creationism, and fiat creationism. Atheistic…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is interesting to see the “evolution” of these 3 worldviews. From the Naturalist who views everything as natural in it’s existence – you exist based on your senses and experiences alone to the Secular Humanist with their realization that humans are wonderful – great creatures with personalities and determinations, but it doesn’t matter…to the Atheistic Existentialist (AE) – who finally realizes that the innermost feelings and desires we have as humans do exist, but would be better off “killed” or cut out than to be nurtured and followed.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I will now take a look at the problem of evil which is most frequently used in the argument against theism. In H. J. McCloskey’s essay, God and Evil, he states the problem in this way, “Evil is a problem for the theist in that a contradiction is involved in the fact of evil on the one hand, and the belief in the omnipotence and perfection of God on the other. God cannot be both all-powerful and perfectly good if evil is real.” An argument can be formulated to disprove the existence of God in the following way:…

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He quoted a man by the name of Hugh Ross, an astrophysicist who founded a religious ministry that “seeks to show that science supports Christian scripture.” Ross made an agreeable point in stating that “It’s just planet Earth that has spiritual beings in need of redemption. … That doesn’t rule out dolphins or grass or bacteria on another planet. … It’s not Jesus Christ dying on 1,000 planets.” These quotes point to a different spectrum of Christianity, one where the belief system is not quite as biased or critical as the…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The theistic argument that I think is most plausible is the Cosmological Argument. I think this because to me this is the only argument that is plausible because things do not exist without a cause. For example, people and animals do not exist without reproduction. People must have a first cause to be created and exist. “The cosmological argument for God’s existence goes like this: The world could not exist on its own so there must have been a first cause that brought it into being.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘The cosmological argument shows that it is reasonable to believe in God’ How far do you agree? - 15 Mark…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The school you went to (I guess your atendance was for about a week was it?) was almost certainly originally started by Christians, same with your universities, (I do understand they were wasted on you). Most of the developed world is or was Christian; historically Science owes much to Christianity, however, over the last 100 years this has not been the case, so what you need to ask is- can you make a case (from facts) that atheism in the last 100 years has been more beneficial than theism, as all that I hear from new atheists is how bad their life is, like you, they are miserable, however, you have got your dream so live it, don’t concern yourself what I do or am, as I have as much as you materialistically, more than you intellectually and considerably more than you in wellbeing. You are in a living hell and your only future is to progress to hopelessness, hopeless is what you are and hopelessness is what you will…

    • 1819 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atheism; the lack of God or gods. Many believe in the lack of the existence of God or gods because they have not been well-educated enough in the realm of knowing where we as humans come from. Knowledge is indeed the pathway of success or the key to absolute serenity, if you will. While many believe in the teachings of famous Philosophers such as Charles Darwin and Ayn Rand, Atheism is at fault while Christianity proves itself to be true because there is Geographical evidence that supports the bible and Atheism offers no hope.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the first reasons for a rise in atheism is due to our increased scientific knowledge, which is now being described as ‘the supreme catalyst’ for the rise of atheism. The reason for science having such an influence is due to the fact that it now gives us natural explanations for many…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Atheist Argument

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages

    So on an atheist page I follow the admin posted this and then some random guy says…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I'll just point out that although I don't believe in a "biblical," or "christian" God-- I do think that mere existence merits explanation beyond what science holds for me at this point, therefore I think that at a fundamental level there is a creative "energy/entity" that made possible the "plane of existence." I-- for instance-- think that the universe was made by a wholly natural, long, and painstakingly haphazard series of coincidences. I think that religion is something that we are predisposed to archetypal-ly (Jungian archetypal-ly...in it's actual definition... not the cluster-fuck definition where ancient gods are ACTUALLY doing things) on a genetic level, for the propagation of the species, and it's ultimate survival... I look at the emergence of most organized religion being within several thousand years of each other as a tell-tale sign of an evolutionary "quick-fix," or a "compatibility-patch" (obviously religion is inclusive in nature for those that are already in a religion), if you will. And, I even view religions as "macro-organisms" taking and devouring what they could as they expanded... but that faith in such idiosyncratic beliefs has been outpaced by the telescopic nature of our science, and technology, as well as cultural and social evolution in the last 100 years. It seems, to me that as science moves forward, so to does the pacing at which culture evolves, and ultimately the rate at which religion tries to "hold true" to it's pillars. I think that now, we as a species stand at an impasse, wherein we aspire for so much-- but to much concern there are many among us that poisonously cling to dogma. They praise the idols we carved of wood and stone millennia ago. I view this as the epicenter for most strife we see today; the turmoil; the hypocritical-bigotry; the circular arguments-from-ignorance... I think, that with the passing of time, and the advancement of culture and science, we should (hopefully) find…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    a. Start off with a block quote to catch the reader’s attention about which part of the world believes in Atheism…

    • 1679 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    McCloskey begins his argument by implying that there is no definitive case established for God and therefore belief in such a God is worth abandoning. My response examines several points. The existence of God is the best explanation for what exists in the universe. Scientists believe that gravity explains certain effects; gravity is a consistent undeniable reality. Although scientists have never seen gravity, various physical “laws” define its effects on earth and on the moon. We have not seen God, but the imprint of His fingerprints continue to cause undeniable effects with men. These effects are the best explanation that God exists. Were we even to take the minimalistic approach, are not there evidences of an intelligent Creator reflected through such human characteristics such as personality, morality and intelligence. No other species minimal description compares with the God of the Bible. Yet, wherever trail of history has taken man, there are accounts of men who established and upheld moral standards.…

    • 1559 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays