Preview

Mr sean hobbins

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
286 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mr sean hobbins
To what extent does the impact of the first world war explain the outbreak of two revolutions in Russia in 1917? I personally think the first world war and the revolutions of 1917 relate to each other, and it does in fact explain the outbreak of the 1917 revolution. This is because Russia’s performance in he war was very poor, and all the problems during the war was being reflected back at home. So in a way the first world war and the revolution of 1917 had a relationship.

The first world war had a huge role to play in the revolution. Their poor performance had a negative impact on the Russians back on home soil, and this resulted in the Russians having even more doubt with the Tsar. There were a lot of problems back in Russia at the time such as little economic growth and mass famine.However i think the first world war was the tipping point for most, and when Nicholas 2nd took over of the military in 1914 his unorganisation and weaknesses were revealed. Many then saw the Tsar unfit to run the country.

You could also argue that if it wasn’t for the first world war the Tsar would have remained in power. So to a certain extent you could argue that it was one of many factors that resulted in turmoil for the Tsar. Russia’s state was not good before hand, with economic and social issues. When the provisional government eventually took over things were no better, people were still unhappy and over time the provisional government did not do much to solve the issues at the time. Therefore they were almost like a temporary solution to their on going problems.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II succeeded in making a bad situation in Russia even worse. He became a leader at a difficult time, and could never stop the process of revolution. The Tsar was not a good leader, and was out of touch with the Russian people. He was also weak and indecisive, and extremely stubborn. Nicholas II was not equipped to effectively rule a country the size of Russia, and with a vast variety of people with different language, religion, race and culture. Additionally, Nicholas II was mainly concerned with family issues, instead of being concerned with political issues. It was these traits in Nicholas II?s personality that hindered him in being able to attempt to steer Russia away from revolution.…

    • 1455 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the riots of 1917, the Tsarist regime collapsed, and many would argue that it was mainly as a result of the First World War beginning in 1914.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historians may believe the Provisional Government was doomed because of a major problem with the provisional government which was the Dual Authority. The Provisional Government was made up of members of the old Duma that had refused to disband at the Tsars command. This meant that they were basically the same men that the Tsar had appointed before the revolution, so nothing had changed in that regard. Consequently, they had no goodwill from the public backing them up, so they would be judged purely on what the public could see happening. Furthermore, the Government had to share power with the Petrograd Soviet. This illegitimate relationship lessened the power of the Provisional Government existentially. Incidentally, it should be mentioned that the two factions were not necessarily hostile towards one another from the start, with some members being members of both groups at the same time. This combination of convenience however, could not last for long.Without a shred of a doubt, one of the biggest problems with the Provisional Government was the continuation of the war. The war was a lost cause by this stage and the Provisional Government would have wanted to pull out if it were a logical possibility, but in order to keep Russia afloat they needed to keep up the fight for the money that they were receiving from Britain and France. The loans that Russia had taken out from these countries while under the Tsarist regime had left Russia financially destroyed. The injections of money and supplies that the allies were providing Russia with because of their involvement in the war was the only thing keeping Russia stable. If Russia could have started to engage in peace talks, as suggested by Josef Stalin, then the Provisional Government could concentrate on sorting out the social and economic problems properly, but because of the desperate need for the war credits, this was not a viable solution. The effect of this choice to keep fighting is somewhat akin to watching a…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To what extent was World War One the main cause of the February Revolution 1917?…

    • 3026 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War 1 was a crucial and defining factor which led to the collapse of the Romanov Dynasty in February, 1917. Without it a revolution would not have happened at this point in time. This is not to say a revolution would not have eventually happened, as there were many other contributing factors that sparked the revolution. However, what World War 1 essentially did was to heighten discontent throughout society enough for it to revolt.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were actually two revolutions that occurred in Russia during 1917. The revolutions completely changed Russia into the Russia we know today. The two revolutions occurred in February and October of 1917.In the book Animal Farm by George Orwell, Mr. Orwell shows how the Russian Revolution of 1917 as one that resulted in a government more oppressive, totalitarian, and deadly than the one it overthrew. There is an abundance of characters in his book that corresponds to those of the Russian Revolution: Old Major, Snowball, and Napoleon represent the ruling figures of the Russian Revolution ("CliffNotes").…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To what extent was Tsar Nicholas II responsible for the outbreak of the Russian Revolution in 1917…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To a large extent I believe that the provisional government was responsible for its own downfall due to the fact that they had to share power with the soviets and their perilous decision to continue fighting in the First World War. Their decision to carry on fighting in the war was the most important due to lost support from the Russian people and more importantly, from the armed forces who they relied on to defend them. There are also other factors which contributed to the provisional government’s downfall such as the return of Lenin and the Kornilov affair which led to the success and rise of the Bolsheviks.…

    • 875 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Russian revolution which began in 1905 was a wave of mass political and social unrest that spread through vast areas of the Russian empire.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I believe that one of the main reasons for the Tsar’s abdication and the collapse of the Romanov rule was the poor state which Russia was in. Russia’s economy was at the worst it had ever been. The economy was far worse than other countries in the War. There were millions of peasants in Russia who had very limited amount of money. With such a limited amount of money, many peasants were unable to buy food, and drink to help them to survive. Peasants believed that they weren’t getting rewarded fairly for the work which they were doing. The upper classes’ benefit greatly due to work done by the Peasants. This created a negative atmosphere around Russia and helped fuel the need for a change. Peasants wanted change; they wanted to be rewarded more for their efforts at work. Russia was in an economic crisis. They had borrowed a huge amount of money from capital countries in order to fuel Russia’s war effort. This was a problem for Russia because they simply didn’t have the money to repay these countries. During the war the country had suffered inflation. Prices had risen dramatically for everyday items such as bread. The country was suffering and the Russian people’s families were dyeing in a war which wasn’t being funded. The Russian people were bound to be discontent and they only had one person to blame and that was the Tsar.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Russian revolution of 1917 saw the overthrow of the tsarist autocracy in February and the seizure of power by the Bolshevik party in October.The Bolsheviks proceeded to establish the world’s first Communist state on a territory covering one-sixth of the globe. A series of events and ideas led to the October revolution, each significant in its own capacity.…

    • 3563 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The second revolution in Russia at the time of World War One, following the first revolt in 1905, took place in February (March for the rest of Europe) of the year 1917. At the time, the conditions of the nation were strained under almost every aspect. The decision of the Tsar Nicholas II to appoint himself as supreme commander of the military forces had lead to a series of serious military defeats, and the number of casualties was extremely high. While Russia was occupied in the fighting, in the attempt to organize its forces, the population was suffering from severe food shortages, and a high inflation and unemployment rate, which had lead to workers demanding better living standards and peasants land redistribution through multiple strikes and demonstrations. Although some were still in support of the war, the public dissent indicated that most demanded the end of the conflict.…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First World War had three main affects that were responsible for the downfall of the Tsar. To start with the loss of agricultural workers and horses to the army, coupled with the takeover of railway lines by the army, led to severe food shortages in towns and cities as supply could not cope. Moscow, for example, had been receiving 2,200 railway wagons of grain per month in 1914, but by Christmas 1916, this figure was down to around 300 wagons. Therefore, there was not enough food to feed the people of Russia despite the rationing that had been brought into place. This resulted in the people of Russia becoming upset and hungry and taking part in more strikes and demonstrations on the same issue of workers conditions.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another difference between the Russian and Chinese revolution was that the Russian revolution was influenced a lot by the first world war, while the Chinese revolution was…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    These events triggered a reaction in the Russian population. Sectors that supported Tsar government sided against him for the first time. Tension once again was settled in Russia and revolutionary movements reappeared.…

    • 569 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays