Preview

Monster By Walter Dean Myers: Character Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
699 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Monster By Walter Dean Myers: Character Analysis
Teachers can help one individual in more than one way. A teacher can be someone who knows more about a student's background than anyone else. In the novel “Monster” by Walter Dean Myers the readers are introduced to Steve Harmon. Steve gets proven innocent with the help of his teacher and also by the jury finding out he was not part of the robbery and the crime committed. The character Steve is perceived as innocent because of his teacher’s good testimony, Mrs. Henry not being able to recognizing steve in the lineup and by Bobo testifying that Steve never gave out a signal in the drug store. To begin with the character Steve is perceived as innocent because his teacher said he was an outstanding person. Everybody is in the courtroom, Mr. …show more content…
Steve is also perceived as innocent because Mrs.Henry was not able to recognize him from the pictures in the lineups. Mrs.Henry admits on only recognizing King.
Petrocelli: “Mrs. Henry, do you recognize anyone present today in this courtroom who was also in the drugstore on the day to which you are referring.”
Henry: “The gentlemen sitting at that table was one of the men arguing. (she points to king) (Myers 164).
This quote shows that Steve is innocent because if he was at the drugstore, it would of been more likely that Mrs.Henry would of recognized Steve. This proves Steve’s innocence because it would of been hard not to remember someone in a robbery or a crime scene. Mrs.Henry went through such a hard time then she would of most likely remembered who and who was there. Having Mrs.Henry not remembering Steve as someone being there is very beneficial for Steve and his ability to be free. Steve has been described in a variety of ways but he can also be perceived as innocent because Bobo stated that Steve did not give out a signal in the drug store. Bobo takes the stand and testifies what Steve’s actions were. Petrocelli: “You said that you received a sign from Mr.Harmon. Can you tell me what that sign

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Walter, the security guard, was acting as a representative of BUGusa protecting its sensitive information. Walter discovered Steve was a spy for Wiretime, a competitor, and considered his duty to expose him to BUGusa by gathering the proper information from Steve. The security guard committed the tort of False Imprisonment on Steve. Because Walter is employed by BUGusa, Walter is the agent and BUGusa is the principal, making BUGusa ultimately responsible for Walter’s actions because Walter acted under the doctrine of apparent authority (Melvin, 2011, pp.251)…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In writing his novel “Monster”, Walter Dean Myers used his experience to keep the judicial system relevant to his points while still realistic. Steve’s attorney, O’Brien, is honest about her role in the system to Steve, telling him, “My job is to make sure the law works for you as well as against you.” Instead of pretending to be crusading for a not guilty verdict, O’Brien tells the truth that she intends to help hunt down the truth both for and against Steve as an unbiased tool of the court. This means that she will insure that the jury’s predispositions do not change their verdicts, that the prejudice of the court doesn’t change the evidence given in court, and that the evidence against Steve is legitimate and/or nonexistent.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furthermore, Steve brings up the death of the motorcycle boy and how James looks exactly like him he says,…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his novel Monster, Walter Dean Myers demonstrates the complexity of the justice system, and how people can be tried unethically. The characters, Bobo Evans, Steve Harmon, James King, and Osvaldo Cruz all differ in magnitude of guilt and involvement, but were tried either too harsh, or let off too easily. What differs in each person’s case is attributed to biases including age, race, and cooperations with the police. The first poorly tried suspect in this felony-murder case was Osvaldo Cruz. Osvaldo is a fourteen year old boy who helped out in the robbery, but claimed it was in fear of the suspects that drove him to do this. Osvaldo gave tips to the police, helping them out with the crime. Due to this fact and his young age, he was not tried…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bobby Dassey went to court for testimony against Steven. Bobby claimed that he had seen Teresa taking pictures then walking towards Steven's trailer. He argued that Steven was the last person that had been with Teresa. Steven argued that he was not the last person to see Teresa because he had seen her leave. Bobby mentions a joke about Steven asking him and his friend, Michael if they wanted to help get rid of a body. It was the third party to tell the jury about this "joke." The board had claimed that they were the ones that Bobby first told about this "joke." Testimony from Bobby established a timeline that was seen as evidence.…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Throughout the novella I Am Legend by Richard Matheson, Robert Neville, the last human who is immune to this disease, is an anti-hero. For instance, towards the end of the story, during his state of confusion after he woke up, he felt pain that he had not ever felt before and thought that it must mean it was the end and said to himself ‘’I am going to die’’ (p.164). This statement shows that he accepts that his life will end here and he will not try to fight it in any way in order to continue surviving. In addition to this, after he realizes where he is and what happened, Ruth came to check on him and asks him why he did not leave beforehand like she told him to in the letter she left him. Robert explained to her ‘’I…couldn’t […] I almost…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. In what ways does the natural landscape serve as a metaphor for Ann’s emotional…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Flippery Slope Analysis

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He makes a false conclusion within his own statement, all of the other jurors noticed this at this point. These are the final words of the Man with a Cold before he goes and sits in a corner.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the story Tom Robinson explains the events that happened on the day of the supposed rape with the most details he can, and there were no holes in his story that might suggest he is lying, and if he were lying it would make him a really good one. And we all know only the wise can make such lies were there is no flaw in them: and not to be rude but Tom was not all that wise. For he did not have much of an education. He was a…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Father Flynn Innocent

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Everyone knows what it is like to be accused of something. In the play doubt written by John Patrick Shanley the reader questions whether or not one of the main characters Father Flynn is innocent or guilty. Father Flynn is accused of sexually harassing a student. The students name is Donald Muller; he is the only African American child at his school. I believe that Father Flynn is innocent. I believe he is innocent. There is plenty of evidence to back up Father Flynn’s innocence, and there is none to prove that he is guilty; therefore I believe he is innocent.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    CRIME AFTHER CRIME

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages

    life. This film is simply unbelievable, I wonder how can an D.A's office name “Steve…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lastly, Steve was definitely non-emotional, not even caring that he had put Alberto into a coma, only making sure that he didn’t…

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the opposing arguments that can be made for Henry’s innocence is that Henry isn’t technically a human. I disagree with this statement because Henry is able to do the same things that humans can do once he switched places with his victim: the new Aniday. After the switch, he took piano lessons, went to college, and even started a band, 3 things only humans can possibly do. So I believe the argument that Henry Day is technically not an adult is irrelevant, because he is able to live a sufficient life as a human. Another opposing argument that was made was that Henry Day wasn’t even a real person in real life, so that he couldn’t possibly be charged with a crime because he doesn’t exist. I again wholeheartedly disagree with this statement because that wasn’t the point of the trial. The point of the trial was to declare who was guilty within the realm of the story, and not relate it too much to real life outside of The Stolen…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The film “12 Angry Men” is a 1957 drama consisting of a dozen men on jury, who attempt to reach a verdict involving a teenager in a murder case. A guilty verdict was initially predicted, but the jury members start questioning and reasoning the testimonies given in court. Was the boy being accused of stabbing his father really guilty? All the information regarding the timing of the train, the timing of the murder, and the testimonies did not add up. Through much debate, a complex voting process, and many concepts learned through SCOM, the jury managed to attain a not-guilty ruling due to the inadequate testimonies and facts gathered.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At first Mr. Davis’ bases his vote more so for the sake of discussion after all, the jurors must believe beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty. As the deliberations unfold, the story quickly becomes a study of the jurors’ complex personalities (ranging from wise, bright and empathetic to arrogant, prejudiced and merciless), preconceptions, backgrounds and interactions. That provides the backdrop to Mr. Davis’ attempts in convincing the other jurors that a “not guilty” verdict might be appropriate.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays