Communication In 12 Angry Men

The film “12 Angry Men” is a 1957 drama consisting of a dozen men on jury, who attempt to reach a verdict involving a teenager in a murder case. A guilty verdict was initially predicted, but the jury members start questioning and reasoning the testimonies given in court. Was the boy being accused of stabbing his father really guilty? All the information regarding the timing of the train, the timing of the murder, and the testimonies did not add up. Through much debate, a complex voting process, and many concepts learned through SCOM, the jury managed to attain a not-guilty ruling due to the inadequate testimonies and facts gathered. The topic of perception of self and others was seen through the majority on the beginning of the film, “12 Angry Men.” Perception is when you choose, organize, and
Unlike the linear and interactive model, the transactional model is a two-way street of communication where an individual act as both a sender and receiver. The individuals interconnect by not only listening, but providing feedback as well. As there is multiple disagreement throughout the movie, it is undeniable this process takes place. Each statement they say influences a juror debating for another verdict. They are frustrated by the content being brought up and needed to be reevaluated and also the way it is being presented. Some jurors do not want to wait in the hot room while someone wastes their time doing an actual demonstration of the old men walking from his bedroom to the front door. This causes more evidence to be discussed in order to fully convince the other party. Through these examples and concepts provided, it is clear they are all interconnected in one way or another. There is always a cause and effect and a point to be made. Fortunately, this jury was able to overcome the intense discussion of evidence and their inaccuracies while also being trapped in a sizzling hot