Preview

Misjudging People In Richard III

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1401 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Misjudging People In Richard III
The fact that the audience works in tandem with the actors on stage to dethrone Richard—or at least desire this dethronement—means they have some power, even if that is just the power of judgment. Phyllis Rackin argues that audience members play just as great a role in judging and misjudging characters within Richard II as any character within the stage. She acknowledges, “There is an extra role in the play not listed in the dramatis personae, a carefully calculated role complete with motivations…designed to be filled by the members of the audience” (263). However important the audience may seem to her argument, though, she also insists, “Shakespeare deliberately alienates us from the action on stage, reminding us that we are, after all, simply an audience in a theatre …show more content…
Certainly Shakespeare is aware of audience and the role they play within the theatre, but I take issue with the idea he wrote Richard II as an exercise in isolating an audience from characters for the sake of reminding them of their lack of participation in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare portrays Richard's deception through his soliloquies and asides, revealing his multifaceted nature. Richard is shown to use intelligent word play, irony and stichomythia; he is ultimately cast as the Machiavellian character "determined to play a villain". Richard blames his appearance for his immoral acts "deformed, unfinished, sent before my time" and uses it to fulfill his hunger for power. Richard's duplicity is emphasized when Clarence is sent to the tower. Any sympathy elicited from the audience is undermined by the thick irony in the dialogue. Richard appears to have no idea what is going on and innocently asks "Brother, good day. What means this armed guard/ That waits upon your grace?" Richard then tries to act like the loving brother "Brother farewell… this deep disgrace/ Touches me deeper than you can imagine". The Elizabethan audience is reassured that divine order will be restored and retribution will be reaped, Richard will be punished for his deceptive act. 'Looking for Richard'…

    • 902 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Richard’s ability as an actor within a play explores how this type of villainy was entertaining in the era of Shakespeare. Richard’s evil is immediately established as his moral deformities are clearly embodied in his physical deformities. In justifying his premeditated meddling, he personifies war in his first soliloquy. ‘Grim visag’d war hath supported his wrinkled front’ and moved to caper ‘ nimbly in a lady’s chamber!’ Richard’s nature: ‘Deform’d, unfinished’ thus justifies his evil as he cannot participate in the war -lovemaking atmosphere. This was obviously a form of entertainment to the Shakespearean audience who had known of the war of the Roses and Richard’s deformities.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Context: Relatively peaceful, S makes R a devil and usurper to legitimise Eliz. Claim to throne. People were aware of RIII& Tudor’s overthrow of Platagenets, therefore play is dramatisation of actual events. Audience related to the values in the play-divine right, treatment and place of women, good&evil, religion. Nobles spoke in Iambic P, whilst servants spoke in rough prose, this was real, therefore made sense to the audience, everyone loved the theatre.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare’s play King Richard III and Al Pacino’s documentary Looking for Richard are two text composed more than 400 years apart that can be linked through their themes and techniques. The influence of these themes or values however, is subject to the context of the audience. Both texts explore the characterisation of the main character Richard and how he is presented. They explore the craft of performance, presenting two different approaches to acting and ownership of the actor. The theme of ambition is also prominent in the opening scenes of the texts as audience members are both implicitly and explicitly presented the objectives of the composers and Richard throughout the productions. Due to the mediums of the texts these themes are conveyed using different devices available to plays and documentaries respectively. Shakespeare relies of soliloquies and strong religious reference to establish the importance behind Richard’s plots, the over dramatic representation of Richard as a deformed cripple insights humour and alliance with Queen Elizabeth. Al Pacino instead uses voxpopuli and explanations of the play, as it develops to ensure audience members are able to understand Shakespeare’s intended purpose in a contemporary setting. The storyline is also altered through certain omission and additions highlighting certain aspects of the plot to suit his objective. It is important also to note the differing purposes of the two texts when considering not only links between them but also their differences.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In KRII, Richard’s evil dual personality was an inconceivable concept to the Elizabethan audience. They viewed Richard as a renowned villain of history during the War of the Roses, and only as a villain within the play. This allowed no room for tragedy, as they did not sympathise with Richard. Richard’s villainy was also further emphasised in his physical deformity, hinting at the corruption of the mind. Richard is seen as the vice of morality plays, and an example of the Christian devil in how he acts and constantly reminds us that he is “…determined to prove a villain” [Act 1, Scene 1] in his soliloquies and asides.…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both readers and viewers have difficulty making sense out of what Shakespeare is trying to say. However, it is a tad bit easier for the reader to understand Shakespeare than the viewer. This is because when the reader is reading the play, they have the translations available to them in the footnotes. McWhorter mentions that in a theatre play, boredom arouses in the audience simply because they are not able to fully understand what the actors are saying; even if the actor goes above…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Annotated Biblography

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Brown, John Russel. “Staging Shakespeare’s Plays: A Choice of Theatres.” Omni in Full Text Mega. N.p., May 2010. Web. 14 Dec. 2012. A winner of the Best Speculative Fiction novel and a visiting professor of the University of London, John Brown informs the general public of the theatre and its audience during William Shakespeare’s life. Brown says that the theatre was low to ground and it was constructed to be a three sided stage that would allow the audience to really be involved and pay special attention to the play. Brown reinforces this statement by detailing how this theatre permitted the audience to gather clues that would enhance their understanding of the play. The article offers a valid description of how the construction of the theatre really helped the audiences understand the performance.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the world of King Lear, being a shakespearean tragedy, suffering, loss, and injustice are all factors often expected before an audience enters the bottomless pit of complicated characters, varying agendas, and Shakespearean english these productions usually employed. However, despite its melancholy undertone and lack of warmer lighting gels on stage, King Lear is not without hope.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conflicts are explored and help captivate audiences. The use of Shakespeare’s language also helps to facilitate these themes.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury and Stage Directions

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Reginald Rose’s use of stage directions is essential in the play. Without them the audience would not understand his intended social criticism.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The overarching research question, what is the intersection of women in Elizabethan acting practices, specifically the role of censorship via the Master of Revels, between representation and casting female roles in Elizabethan theatre was covered through the explanation of who The Master of Revels were and how women were portrayed. Elizabethan acting practices, specifically the role of censorship through the Master of Revels, between representation and casting female roles set up Elizabethan theatre and how it was made as well as viewed during the Elizabethan Era. This is all very important in understanding Elizabethan Theatre because it showed just how women were being viewed and portrayed. It is important to look into how society looked at women to understand the societal stereotyping that emerged from this form of…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard III Values

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Despite the contextual values, Shakespeare gives strong, prophetic and critical voices to the female characters of ‘Riii’. The women; ‘Anne’, ‘Margaret’, ‘Elizabeth’ and the ‘Duchess of York’ accurately depict the circumstances, characters and moral stances of the tragedy. ‘Thou hadst a Clarence too, and Richard killed him.’. Through mourning, cursing and prophesising the women provide insightful social commentary about the true nature of the nobility and their male counterparts. “Edward for Edward plays a dying debt”. The power of their speech and character is reinforced by strong animal imagery ‘rooting hog’ and Queen Elizabeth’s ability to match Richard in linguistics and wit “send to her by the man that slew her brother’. However, Shakespeare’s work is impacted upon by the ingrained values of his contextual society as his depiction of women and their role in the social hierarchy shows. Riii demonstrates that the thoughts of women are not valued highly; the audience is never allowed to see Elizabeth deciding to bestow her daughter on Richmond. Instead the audience is provided with Stanley's laconic report that ‘the Queen hath heartily consented / He [Richmond] should espouse Elizabeth her daughter’. This appeals to the nature of Shakespeare’s contextual…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard Iii Conscience

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The attack of "conscience" that King Richard suffers in Act 5, Scene 5 of Shakespeare's Richard III (133-157) can be seen as the psychological climax of the drama, one that is critical to both Richard's development as a character and the play's ultimate success. Richard's struggle to reconcile the many different roles he attempts to play into one unified self, reflected in the tone and composition of his speech, adds depth and humanity to his character; at the same time, his ultimate failure to maintain his "self-made" identity simplifies the play in a way that allows the author to satisfy his audience by punishing the villain and reaffirming the world views that Richard's character appears to challenge (Luxon). While examining his own vision of himself, Richard finds his identity at a breaking point, and is forced to rely on the very ideas he used for his own advantage to judge himself. As the king, who seemed to be above the "afflict[ion] of "coward conscience" (5.5.133) is overwhelmed by the many different conceptions of who he is that are presented in the play, the audience cannot help but feel a mixture of sympathy and relief.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The exploration of William Shakespeare’s play ‘King Richard III’ and Al Pacino’s 1996 doco-drama film ‘Looking for Richard’ reveals the explicit relationships between each text and their respective audience. The Elizabethan and twentieth century contexts in each of these texts are important as it demonstrates the value of each text and enables the understanding of how the film enriches the ideas presented in the play. Shakespeare’s ‘King Richard III’ portrays a malicious and corrupted Richard to explore the themes of divine justice and the notion of outer appearance versus inner reality in the theocentric context of the Elizabethan society. Four centuries later, Al Pacino’s ‘Looking for Richard’ reflects the director’s quest to come to terms with a Shakespearean text in a contemporary context, providing a personal examination of the same Richard’s behaviour, whist simultaneously reflects the post modern era with the absence of divine order and the change in views of conscience. Ultimately, it is through the study of these texts and a comparative study that these texts illuminate our understanding of different contexts and values.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    A hero within his own mind Williams Shakespeare’s King Richard III grew up in the turbulent time of the latter years of the War of the Rose between years 1455-1485. Born in England in 1452, King Richard III was not famous and well known for his services to England as their King rather; he was best known for being accused of murdering his two nephews to protect his throne. Shakespeare portrayed Richard III as being a tyrannical ruler. Villains performs actual important role in a play. They the world biggest problem and are typically evil and compared to being bad or good. A villain is considered the hero's enemy since he is the evil person. There's no doubt that heroes play a range of important…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays