Preview

Minority and majority Governments

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
817 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Minority and majority Governments
Lucy Lizarraga
Socials 11
Mr. Carr
Minority and Majority Governments
A Government is a system of political direction and control necessary to the existence of civilized society. Canada’s government operates as a federal system, where an organization of provincial governments is each acting on behalf of its own residents. Along Canadian history, there have been many governments with different beliefs; as a democratic country, they participate with their political parties to govern Canada. They are classified into Majority and Minority governments; and they can bring advantages and disadvantages to Canadian people. Much of what happens in the government relates to party politics. The politics of Canada function with strong democratic traditions and as a modern nation; it is governed by one or more political parties which are fundamental to the parliamentary system. They all support some form of capitalism and the kind of parliamentary democracy that Canada currently lives in. Political parties are organized by different political and social ideologies that guide every single one of their actions. Of course, not all political parties have always been successful. Their main goal is to gain and keep power.
The party that gets the most seats (more than half of all the MPs) in the House of Commons normally forms the government with that party’s leader becoming the Prime Minister. This party would then be known as the Majority Government; and through party discipline, exercises an incredible amount of control over the government policy and the parliament. Two parties have dominated politics in Canada: The liberal party and the Conservative Party from 1943 to 2003. These are the only two parties to have formed a government, although often as the lead party in a minority government. Some of the advantages to Canadian people would be that more seems to get done as bills can more easily be passed in the House of Commons. Majority Governments are able to implement their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    "Abolish The Senate: A Sober Second Look at Canadian Democracy." Abolish The Senate RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Mar. 2014. .…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One argument for is that the cabinet includes more than one political party, this means that the Prime Minister has to confer, with other MP’s and with the other party in the coalition, on all matters. This limits the patronage and decision-making power of the Prime Minister, and that he/ she has to share their power with another party, in order to come to a decision that both parties are happy with. An example of this was when the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats had to discuss the annual Spending Review and decide which taxes they should raise and cut. This led to both parties wanting to cut different taxes, which the other party wanted to raise, such as housing. If only one party was in government and the one Prime Minister had all the power, then they would have been able to cut and raise the taxes they wanted to, but being in a coalition meant that they had to come to a group agreement, where both parties weren’t entirely happy. This argument is quite strong because if the Prime Minister has to share his/ her powers it means it is harder for the cabinet to come to a decision, however it does lead to the decision being fairer and appealing to a wider range of the population.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Inuit Tapirisat Essay

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As a province,Nunavut will have the same structure as other provinces, giving full voting rights to the population, and more representation by people elected by the local population at meetings of the premiers of the provinces and territories of Canada. This will include the ability to collect provincial taxes, and operate a provincial budget without the supervision of the federal government.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Canada and Germany are countries that have different political ideologies also they have some parts of government bear similarities.Although they are two different country, there are have three clear difference between two government systems they use.First, Canada has a three parts of parliament,with House of Common, Senate and Government Governor. In contrast, Germany only have two parts of parliament,with a Bundestag and Bundersrat.Secondly, Canada is president have power, but in Germany is Chancellor.Finally, compare advantage and disadvantage of two government system, Germany’s goverment system is more…

    • 87 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two countries I have chosen to compare are China and Canada. Their systems of government are very different and have different powers and rolls in their country. Canada has a system of government very similar to our own. While china's government appears to be similar as well, but it is quite different. Canada's government democratic and is parliamentary in form but, very much like our own. Like all large governments it is representative democracy. Canada has a central government designed to deal with the country as a whole. Things like national defense, banking, currency, and commerce are controlled by the central government. All other matters are left to the provinces to deal with. Such as education, hospitals, and civil rights are responsibilities of the states. The Canadian Parliament consists of two houses. Their Senate is made up of 104 members who serve until the age of seventy-five. The House of Commons is composed of 295 members who are popularly elected to serve for five-year terms. The Parliament elects the executive, the Prime Minister. Canada has a Federal system and is divided into ten provinces that have powers the way our states do. China's government is a dictatorship it is led by the communist party. A premier who is now Li Peng leads the country. The Executive powers rest in the State Council, which is headed by the premier, Li Peng. The National People's Congress is the most powerful part of China's government. Its members are indirectly elected to serve five-year terms. One representative is elected from each province for every 400,000 people, with a minimum of ten representatives from each. There are approximately 3000 representatives in China's Congress. China also has a federal government. The country is divided into Provinces, which are divided into even smaller divisions of several types. The Communist party controls the government. Other parties do exist but the Communists Party is in control of the government. <br><br>Canada and China…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nomination Paper In Canada

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages

    If individual voice out their opinion individually there will be no order in the House of Commons and difficult to accomplish their party engender and will not have clear “distinction between the government and the opposition in Parliament” . The role of party discipline allows the legislature to “operate effectively, ensures stability of government and eliminates suspense from parliamentary votes” according to the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association. In “Canadian Parliamentary Review – Article,” John Reid, an ardent supporter of party discipline, argue that “under our system of responsible government, the public at an election has great power to make decisions which give them ability to vote effectively results from party…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Prior to 1921, men were the only members of the Canadian parliamentary system. With the first Canadian women being elected into the Canadian parliament in 1921, women have had the ability to participate and become elected into the House of Commons. Since then, Canadian women’s participation in the House of Commons has substantially increased from 1 female seat holder in 1921 to the present day 64 seats held by women. Although this increase is seemed as substantial, the debate about the underrepresentation of women in politics has been a central topic of debate by politicians, scholars and the general public in Canada. Although it is widely agreed that representation of women in the House of Commons needs to increase, there are two fundamentally different views regarding this underrepresentation; the explanatory perspective and the feminist perspective. The explanatory perspective argues that “political institutions should reflect the composition of civil society” , while the feminists perspective argues that, “since women offer unique perspectives, their exclusion from political power means that their needs, demands, and interests would currently not be echoed in the political arena.” However, through the assessment of the definition of democracy, and the evaluation of the feminist’s arguments and explanatory perspectives, the relatively low number of women elected to the House of Commons does not mean the Canadian political system is insufficiently democratic.…

    • 1725 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Majority Party Advantages

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The majority party in Congress has a lot of different advantages in the legislative process. For the Senate, the majority party contains all the chairs for their members, ranks members, and president pro. Having the majority of members means when votes are cast, the majority will win. Delegates the committee to work on the bill. Those who fill the chairs also have the power to vote on moving the selections of legislation to the next level. If the bill makes it to the senate floor, the committee chair man will present it as the expert on it. This means if a bill makes if bill is beneficial to the majority party, it is less likely to die in committee. Having more members of the majority party helps make them more victorious during the committee. Despite these advantages, there will still be opposition usually in the form of filibuster. For the House, the majority…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In theory, the Parliament is the most important institution in the Canadian government and all members of the parliament are equal. The Prime Minister is supposed to be primus inter pares, meaning first among equals. But over the years, the cabinet has become more institutionalized and less departmentalized. Hence the Prime Minister’s power has increased over the years. Canada is the one of the most decentralized federations in the World. Power is swung away from the parliament and is more concentrated in the executive branch (Courtney, 1984: p. 241). The Prime Ministers is not too powerful in a global scale but it has substantial power within Canada. However the power of the Prime Minister can also be affected by many different factors. .…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comparing and contrasting majority influence and minority influence Majority influence is usually thought to produce public conformity, a good example of majority influence in how people behave in the society, In our daily lives, we involuntarilyfollow others so that we can fit in even if we disagree in private, this is also known as normative influence (Manstead & Hewstone, 1996).People comply to others to avoid conflicts, blend and integrate well with the rest, even if it means that they act in ways that are inconsistent with their beliefs. On the other hand, minority influence results in conversion. Minorities need to behave in certain ways in order to convince and influence other people.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prime Minister and Cabinet

    • 3323 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Minority government – party forms a government without a parliamentary majority. Can never rely on getting legislation/financial budgets passed. It must therefore try to build a coalition of support from other parties. Therefore minority governments cannot attempt to do anything radical.…

    • 3323 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is important to be an informed citizen of Canada because this is your new home! The great thing of being a democratic country (a country where the government gives the citizens many rights, like voting) is that you can choose what your government works for. You have the power to vote for or against your…

    • 4772 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Parliamentary Guide

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * Selection of Prime Minister on the will of majority of members of the Parliament.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In terms of stability and democratic values, parliamentarism is not the superior form of government. Parliamentarism lacks stability by sovereignty. Sovereignty leaves the power in the hand of Parliament without any checks or balances to ensure proper governing. Parliaments laws can fluctuate greatly according to whomever is in office, considering that there is no written constitution at times which describes there power, considering they have all the power there is no need for a description of it. The prime minister can be ousted if needed prematurely if his party lacks confidence in him. This vulnerability leaves a prime minister weak and easily swayable. In terms of democratic values a parliamentary system lacks the highest efficiency because of the lack of proportional representation in Parliament. Regardless of the exactly number of parties, a minority party would not hold enough seats to actually make a significant difference.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Electoral System

    • 1295 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Elections are one of the most important factors in democracy; one-person one vote. The voting system is the heart of the representative. This system is what citizens use to create democratic government. Thus, if the voting system does not consider what the voters say, government will not be properly accountable and democracy will then be comprised. This is the core problem in the Canadian political system and our electoral system does not do justice to the Canadian voters. The system does not represent the people, most votes are wasted because in this current system not every vote counts; Canada’s current voting system is based on the winning-take-all principle. It is a system of winners and losers. Where in each riding, one group of voters get to send a Member of Parliament to Parliament, and the party with most seats is asked by the govern general to form a government. The party with second most seats in the House of Commons becomes the opposition. All the other voters in the riding lose. Thus, if you do not support the most popular party in your riding, your vote is ineffective and wasted. As Elections Canada said, the Single Member Plurality system used in all Canadian federal and provincial elections has much strength but also reveals serious weaknesses in producing legislatures that reflect the choice of parties made by the voters. In addition, recent Canadian elections have witnessed a significant fall in voter turnout, which some say indicates that structural changes are needed in order to encourage greater participation. The Single member plurality system clearly does not reflect the concerns of Canadian voters to the point where Canadians do not even bother to vote anymore because their problems and voices are not heard. Proportional Representation would be the best electoral system for Canada because; it produces a legislature that is representative of the views of…

    • 1295 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays