Preview

Military Response To Civil Conflict

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
332 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Military Response To Civil Conflict
Cody Daniels
POLS 170
Critical Thinking Question #4

The argument for military response to civil conflict is mostly upheld by a commitment made by the member states of the United Nations in 2005. This commitments intention was to prevent war crimes, genocide and other crimes against humanity. This policy combined with any example of such military response, such as the offensive against Qaddafi, brings with it an international implication meant to deter such crimes from taking place. The arguments against such military response imply that such a commitment cannot be guaranteed to protect everyone in every nation around the world. This implies that though military force may be used in the name of humanitarianism, special interests are really
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Ramped-Up Military Engagement
    • 167 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of Ramped-Up Military Engagement

    While the political world continues to focus on the machinations of congressional investigations about Russia (which won't have conclusions drawn for months, if not longer) and where health care goes from here, there's another, arguably more important story going on — ramped-up military engagement.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Article Summary: Violence During The Civil War
    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Article Summary: Violence During The Civil War

    They outline that civilian defense forces as a permanent and defensive form of pro-government militia that officials will often use to harness civilians during a counterinsurgency campaign. The authors argue that a civilian defense forces will reduce the problem of insurgent identification. This will lead to a reduction in state violence that targets civilians. Nevertheless, they also claim that these actors can and will undermine civilian support for insurgents, which can lead to rise in rebel violence targeting civilians and overall escalation of violence. the evidence in this article shows that a permanent civilian defense forces decreases the state’s use of indiscriminate violence, but causes a rise in insurgent violence. They also demonstrated that by making civilians the epicenter of the unconventional war effort, civilian defense forces increase the overall loss of life in civil conflicts, at least in the short run. “This underscores the significance of civilian support and control in determining the type and level of violence in civil wars” (Clayton…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Military Strategy
    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Civil War Military Strategy

    In the first years of the war, what were the political and military strategies of each side? Which side was more successful? Why?…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rogerian Argument Outline
    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rogerian Argument Outline

    External military and diplomatic intervention has been the key to solving major civil conflicts and preventing possible genocides in countries such as sierra Leone and Libya while people in countries such as Rwanda and currently in Syria endure the worst because of the blind eye or unwillingness to react to atrocities against humanity by the international community.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Military Intervention
    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Military Intervention

    It is simply human nature to act in one’s view of what’s right and what’s wrong and that posses a major problem when trying to remain neutral is significantly difficult conflicts and challenges. In many scenarios there are tough decisions to be made in regards to taking political stance or politicizing action in humanitarian conflicts. A great example to begin with is from the article by Tom Daschile discussing the current crisis in Ukraine. The piece covers that the Russian government is providing economic assistance and aid to pro-Russian separatist in Ukraine, while the Ukrainian military is outmanned and out of money. The dilemma this piece brings about is questioning whether or not the US and European Union should intervene or financially aid the Ukrainian forces. Is there a right to intervene between conflicts of state governments of two sovereign states? Will the US appear as imperialist if they intervene and support a pro-Ukrainian side for the country? The idea of going in to Ukraine to “save” the Ukrainian people from Russia posses an issue to picking sides and consent against the pro-separatist in Ukraine who want to become part of Russia. The crisis in Ukraine does not appear in the same nature as many other humanitarian crises…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Pledge Of Allegiance Should President Woodrow Wilson
    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Pledge Of Allegiance Should President Woodrow Wilson

    Thesis: The duty to protect and intervene in other counties affairs, militarily if necessary, to protect freedom, liberty and to prevent genocide, ethnic cleansing, and other atrocities is a doctrine to which the United States of America should hold fast to under all circumstances. Throughout American history, the government has struggled to define the fundamental purpose of U.S foreign policy: whether or not the US should intervene internationally to promote freedom and preserve democracy or to maintain national sovereignty. The international community and the obligation that it holds to preserve peace is a responsibility not to be taken lightly. The commitment to uphold freedom and liberty as stated by our very own Pledge of Allegiance should…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Civil War Tactics
    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page

    Civil War Tactics

    Thanks for sharing your post this week! I enjoyed reading and comparing how the internet changed forms of our warfighting tactics. The Civil war is a great example of no instant communication but instead having to rely on man on the horse to relay messages between brigades. With technological and communication advancement, virtual tele conference, instant emails, and chats changed today’s military operation. Continuous exploitation of our enemies through drones and cyber warfare gives latest and most accurate intelligence to our allies. Advantage of weather forecast also allows preparation time for relocation of military assets to alternative locations. Most recent hurricane that occurred in Atlantic coast was a good example of…

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    DISCURSIVE ESSAY FOR ENGLISH
    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages

    DISCURSIVE ESSAY FOR ENGLISH

    A deadly civil war has been raging for two years in Syria between the government and the rebels. Consequently, on 21st August, Damascus was struck by rockets containing chemical materials. Within hours thousands of innocent people were left profoundly distressed at the barbaric aftermath caused by these sudden attacks. 1,429 people were killed including 426 children and the manner of their deaths was unspeakably grim. The Syrian government were accused of conducting these attacks but denied allegations even though evidence clearly shows they were complicit in this deeply inhumane massacre of their own people. Should we just stand passively and allow more chemical callous carnage or should we take military action with the strong possibility that if we do so this could lead to more deaths than we imagined despite the honourable motive involved.’…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Do Civil War Occur? Contrast Two Contemporary Conflicts to Explain Why Politics Turns Into Violence?
    • 2878 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Why Do Civil War Occur? Contrast Two Contemporary Conflicts to Explain Why Politics Turns Into Violence?

    This paper will define civil war and why does it occur. In addition, it will cover civil war in Somalia in 1991 till present and Iraq civil war in the 2006 to 2008 before the invasion of US. These two countries will be used to explain why politics turn into violence. The causes of civil war are due to many factors such as nationalism, failed state, economy, territorial ambition, religious difference or ethnicity, bad leaders, competition of political ideology, natural resources, grievance or greed and insurgency. However, this paper will cover failed state, religion difference or ethnicity, bad leader, national resources, geopolitics, economy, insurgency, greed and weak state to explain politics turning into violence in Iraq and Somalia.…

    • 2878 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Just War Theory and Pacifism
    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Just War Theory and Pacifism

    According to traditional just war theory, a just cause must serve peace and not simply protect an unjust status quo. War must be used as a last resort and all pacifistic approaches must be undertaken. So, if your country is implicated in immoral actions such as oppression of a group of people that terrorist represent, before responding with military action against that group, it is necessary to stop the unjust oppression. If by upholding unjust policies, a society makes peace with a country of people impossible, then military action would just be an extension of that country's unjust policy. This would not be a just war because the reactionary war would be itself an instrument of injustice, and the action would contain an unjust intent.…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    An Avoidable Civil War
    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An Avoidable Civil War

    The explosion of the American Civil War was caused by a vast number of conflicting principles and prejudices, fueled by sectional differences, and set afire by a very unfortunate set of political events. Undoubtedly, the central theme of almost all of the events that led up to the Civil War was one way or another, related to the dispute of slavery. Throughout the nineteenth century, slavery-related tensions brewed to such an extent, that politicians often took accustom to avoiding the hot topic altogether, because they were too scared of either starting a big political feud, or losing votes from one side of the issue or the other. More specifically, three events that were most instrumental in bringing about the Civil War were the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 and the Presidential election of 1860. Because of such strong reactions to these events, the Civil War was practically unstoppable, however if the parties wanted to avoid a war altogether, they could have advocated more compromise and popular sovereignty.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Sociological Perspectives on War
    • 2935 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Sociological Perspectives on War

    Mednicoff, David M. “Humane wars? International Law, Just War Theory and Contemporary Armed Humanitarian Intervention.” Law, Culture and the Humanities Vol. 2 (2006): 373-398…

    • 2935 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Genocide in Rwanda: international response
    • 3465 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Genocide in Rwanda: international response

    I will focus our debate on four discussable questions – each one of them related to the international response to the Rwandan genocide. Firstly, in my seminar I presented the role of France as a Rwandan government 's number-one supplier of weapons. Does this fact alone make France more culpable for the genocide than the rest of the international community? How should responsibility be allocated for what happened, both inside and outside Rwanda? How has the international community, in particular Belgium, France, the United States, and the UN, faced up to the question of responsibility and blame in the years since the genocide? Secondly, the UN authorized the troops as the "peace-keepers," not "peace-makers." By UN mandate, UN troops were permitted to use their weapons only in self-defense. If the generals had disobeyed orders and authorized their troops to fire on fighters who were killing masses in front of their eyes, would they have done the right thing? Next, I mentioned that various factors contributed to the inactivity of the international community, such as the disastrous U.S. humanitarian intervention in Somalia in 1993, less than a year before, which ended with the U.S. helicopter shot down and the bodies of U.S. soldiers dragged through the streets of Mogadishu. Does this justify the U.S. and the UN 's refusal to intervene? Can we risk our own citizen 's lives in order to save foreign and can we risk the reputation of an intergovernmental institution, which possibly could never be restored again in order to help – even if that means that some major countries may not want to cooperate at all in the future? Finally, I will also encourage a debate over possible solutions for halting genocide and violation of human rights – when and how should the governments act, who should contribute the resources etc.…

    • 3465 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Humanitarian Intervention Valentino Analysis
    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Humanitarian Intervention Valentino Analysis

    The main premise of this article, is that military interventions are to be avoided at all cost and are not a productive way of reinforcing human rights and solving the issue of the “loss of lives” from a morailistic humanitarian perspective. The author is referencing primarily the humanitarian factor and believes that military interference is not necessary. Valentino believes aid development instead of intervention could save more lives and be more efficient at the same time. He mentions, that even liberals post cold war are pro intervention, when formally, as in the case of Vietnam, they had always been against it. The author however acknowledges that the left wing supported interventions have been ethical/humanitarian ones (or out of belief…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    The Military's Role and the Effects in a Civilian Supremacy, Civilian Control, and Military Regime
    • 3763 Words
    • 16 Pages

    The Military's Role and the Effects in a Civilian Supremacy, Civilian Control, and Military Regime

    The concept of ‘civilian supremacy’ is one which has proven to be a controversial issue because it deals with the factors surrounding how a state chooses to govern itself and in whose hands the power and right to govern lies in. A state is known to be most concerned with self-preservation and protecting its own interests, and therefore some degree of military is almost always present somewhere within the hierarchy structure of the government. However, it is important to note that the level at which the military is actually involved politically and socially within the state varies. Military intervention can range anywhere from very limited entrance into issues regarding society to the military having complete control over the country. A country that claims to be democratic will either have a civilian supremacy, civilian control, conditional subordination, or military tutelage however, to be considered a liberal democracy the state must be either under civilian supremacy or civilian control. In states of autocratic rule, the government is under either military control or military rule. In today’s modernized version of a democracy, it is not only considered necessary to have a clear division between the government and the military but a high degree of control is needed for the military to be under civilian control. For this sense of the word, ‘civilians’ refer to all persons or organizations that have no attachment to the military. Civilian control, therefore, refers to governments and their agencies having the authority to determine the resources and purpose of the military without needing to concern themselves with the chance of military interference.…

    • 3763 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More

Related Topics