Military Drones Research Paper

The sounds of war: we’ve heard it before. Whether that be in movies or in the media, but we have never experienced it for ourselves. Over 180,000 troops are stationed overseas, risking their lives for the protection of the United States. Now, what if they didn’t have to. “In full accordance with the law-and in order to prevent terrorist attacks on the United States and to save american lives- the United States government conducts targeted strikes against specific al-Qaeda terrorists, sometimes using remotely piloted aircraft, often referred to publicly as drones.” This quote by John O. Brennan, former director of the Central Intelligence Agency, illustrates my point. I believe that the military should use unmanned aerial vehicles, or UAVs. Today I will show you, how drones kill fewer civilians, as a percentage of total fatalities, than any other military weapon, how drones make US military personnel safer and how drone
It is estimated that 174 to 1,047 civilians have been killed in Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia since the United States began conducting drone strikes abroad roughly 8-17% of all deaths from US drones. In comparison, in World War II, civilian deaths, as a percentage of total war fatalities, are estimated at 40 to 67%. This is a significantly lower percent. Also, drones make US military personnel safer. Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and their affiliates often operate in distant and environmentally unforgiving locations where it would be extremely dangerous for the United States to deploy teams of special forces to track and capture terrorists. Such pursuits may pose serious risks to US troops including firefights with surrounding tribal communities, anti-aircraft shelling, land mines, improvised explosive devices (IEDs), suicide bombers, snipers, dangerous weather conditions, harsh environments, and more. The use of UAVs helps eliminate those