Preview

Milgram Experiment Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
573 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Milgram Experiment Research Paper
Brad Birnbaum October 30, 2012
The Milgram Experiment Sociology 115

The Milgram experiment, a study based on a person’s obedience to an authority, was a series of social psychology experiments. These experiments measured the willingness of people to obey a person with authority. During the study, head figures instructed participants to perform acts that would normally conflict with their personal morality.
Milgram’s experiments started shortly after the trial of German Nazi Adolf Eichmann in July of 1961. During the trial, Eichmann defended himself by saying that his actions were simply a result of him following the orders of a higher authority. This struck Milgram and proposed a question that needed to be answered:
…show more content…
Volunteers were enrolled for a lab experiment that dug into learning and ethics. There were 40 males between the ages of 20 to 50 with varied careers. During the experiment there were three roles; a teacher (role of the volunteers), a learner (an actor), and the experimenter. The teacher was asked to administer increasingly sever eclectic shocks to the learner for every incorrect or silent answer given. The shock levels were labeled from 15 to 450 volts. Along with a numerical scale, words such as moderate shock, strong shock, intense shock, danger, and even XXX were added to the scale. The twist is that since the learner was simply an actor, there were no “actual” shocks given, just a verbal response from the learner acting as if the shocks were real. At 75 volts, the leaner began to moan, at 120 they would complain, and at around 285 they let out screams and cries of intense pain. This caused some teachers to not want to continue with the experiment. The experimenter gave commands such as “please continue”, too more aggressive commands like “the experiment requires that you continue” to try to keep the teacher engaged in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Milgram's Experiment brings up the point that people under the pressure of other, will more likely obey orders even if it goes against their moral beliefs. In "To Obey of Not to Obey", most of the soldiers obeyed their superiors because they were taught to do so. Similarly in Migram's Experient, the "teachers" obeyed when the experimenter pressured the subject to continue with the shocks. This can be related to Slaughterhouse Five because the German soldiers are under the command of their superiors who are requiring them to take American prisoners. This pressure was passed down from the German soldiers who demanded the American soldiers to clean up the charred remains of dead civilians after the bombing of Dresden.…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Philadelphia Experiment took place in the fall of 1943 when a group of scientists funded by the U.S. government set out to turn a U.S. Cannon Class destroyer escort into an invisible war machine. The initial conspiracies surrounding the experiment were formulated by two scientists, William L. Moore and Charles Berlitz’. After extensive research, Moore and Berlitz’ concluded that The Philadelphia Experiment went awry when a U.S. Naval Destroyer was used to conduct an experiment based on Albert Einstein’s Unified Field Theory, a theory thought to be able to make objects invisible through the use of electromagnet currents. The officials and scientists in charge of The Philadelphia Experiment chose The USS…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Replicating Milgram (The Open University, 2014), Milgram explains how he set up his obedience experiment. His aim was to get a volunteer, a ‘teacher’ to inflict increasing amounts of pain, through electric shocks, to another volunteer a ‘learner’ and to see when the ‘teacher’ would turn to the researcher, the ‘authority figure’ and ask to stop. Unknown to ‘the teacher’, the ‘learner’ and the ‘authority figure’ were aware of the real purpose of the experiment; the ‘teacher’ was told it was to study the effect of punishment on learning, and genuinely thought that they were inflicting pain on the ‘learner’ sat in another room. It was this deception and the emotional stress it generated to the ‘teacher’ that prompted the ethical issues debate…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Milgram’s article, he explains an experiment he designed to test whether the subjects of the experiment would refuse the orders of authority and follow…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stanley Milgram’s experiment was conducted to justify the acts of Nazi killings during the World War II. Milgram’s general findings after the experiments: Ordinary people are likely to follow orders given by an authority figures even to the extent of hurting or killing other people. He claims that people can act inhumanely with limited feelings and compassion under blind obedience to authority. On his experiment, most of the participants continued to inflict the punishment all the way to the highest level when assured that they are not held responsible. Some participants went on and follow the commanded actions even if they seemed in conflict and against their conscience.…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1963, Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, conducted a series of social psychology experiments to study the conditions under which the people are obedient to authorities and personal conscience. The purpose of his experiment was to determine whether or not people were particularly obedient to the higher authority who instructed them to perform various acts even if they violate their own morals and ethics. It was one of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology as it has inspired other researchers to explore what makes people question authority and more importantly, what leads them to follow orders. There were several replications of his experiment and the results were identical to those reported by Milgram about how…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this experiment, participants were put under immense stress because of what they had to do. They played the role of a "teacher," administrating a shock to a "student" each time they answered one of their questions incorrectly. The shock level was told to be raised the more the student failed, starting at 30 volts and increasing in 15-volt increments all the way to 450 volts. The "teacher" believed it was real, but in actuality the "students" were all acts pretending to be shocked. Most of the participants asked the experiment if they should continue or not after a while.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram's experiment in 1960 by social psychologist Dr. Stanely Milgram's (1963, 1965) was a controversial experiment. He researched the effect of authority on obedience. I don't think the scientific community overreacted to this experiment because it is unethical to reduce subjects to "twitching shuttering wrecks". Though the human mind is amazing strong we still do not know its breaking point. For interviewers to carry out the kind of experiment they did, they have to be willing to face the consequences of the experiment which could be a permanent damaged mental state. I do believe we need to do experiments like this as the outcome was very eye opening but it has to be better regulated and the background and methods of experimentation clearly…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because this is the challenge of human’s moral bottom lane. Back in the day, this experiment took place when the time was right after the World War II in order to find out "Was it that Eichmann and his accomplices in the Holocaust had mutual intent, in at least with regard to the goals of the Holocaust?" As a result, I would say this experiment was particularly discussing about the human’s moral bottom lane. First, I assume I was in that situation to a “teacher” I would never touch that button to shock those people. For the simple reason is that they did not do something bad to me and I need to shock them and no matter how much they will pay me to participate this experiment. According to the resources, [2] 5% of a sample average American adult men were willing to punish another person with increasingly higher voltages of electric shock all the way to the maximum (450 volts) when ordered to by an experimenter who did not possess any coercive powers to enforce his commands. When asked to predict the outcome of the obedience experiment, neither a group of Yale seniors nor a group of psychiatrists were even remotely close to predicting the actual result: Their predicted obedience rates were 1.2% and .125%, respectively. What’s more, The dramatic demonstration that people are much more prone to obey the orders of a legitimate authority than one might have expected remains an enduring insight, but one that is in need of some qualification: Milgram did indeed find drastic underestimations of full obedience (with 3% of the subjects, at the most, expected to obey), [3] but others have obtained findings suggesting that greater accuracy in predicting the outcome of an obedience experiment is possible. Milgram also showed how difficult it is for people to translate their intentions into actions even when moral principles might be at stake, and that momentary situational pressures and…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prior to the experiments, Milgram sought predictions about the outcome from psychiatrists, college sophomores, middle-class adults, graduate students and faculty in behavioral sciences. All thought the teachers would refuse to obey the experimenter. The majority of the teachers would show concern once the learners began showing signs of discomfort. However, 60 percent of them followed the orders until the end, administering shocks to the learner up to 450 volts. (para. 27) The findings were dismissed as having no relevance to “ordinary” people considering the subjects used were students of Yale. Colleagues of Milgram claimed that these students were highly aggressive and competitive when provoked. (para. 27)…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stanley Milgram was an extremely famous psychologist who was best known for his groundbreaking experiment on the subject of obedience during the 1960s. Milgram began his career as a psychologist just around the time that the horrifying truth of the concentration camps came out. The fact that almost an entire nation obeyed one man, who commanded them to do inhumane and grotesque acts to other human beings intrigued Stanley Milgram. He became even more interested when he began watching the trial of Adolf Eichmann, who simply did not seem to be the appalling monster that many people expected and portrayed him to be. In fact, Milgram described Eichmann as being less of a “sadistic monster…[and] that he came closer to being an uninspired bureaucrat…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Milgram Aims and Context

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Milgram’s study was done after the trial of Adolf Eichmann. This was after the holocaust where 6 million Jews were murdered. This trial displayed an example of destructive obedience where people were said to have complied with what they were told to do, even if it had a negative impact on others, which in this case was murdering innocent people, although being completely mentally aware of what they were being asked to do and yet still carried out the task.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Milgram's experiment, if he would have informed his participants that they were being tested on how far they would go when they were ordered to do so, even if it was against their conscience, the participants would never have gone as far as they did and the research would have been fundamentally flawed. There is no accurate way to test human nature if the participants change their behavior based on what is expected of them. "The tendency of people to portray themselves in a more favorable light than their thoughts or actions, is called socially desirable responding (Lalwani)." Socially desirable responding is one of the problems with the use of surveys, and the problem carries over to behavioral studies. If the "teachers" from Milgram's experiment had been told the real purpose of the study, they most likely would have applied far less shock, if they shocked at all because that is what is socially acceptable. No one really knows how far they will go under order until they are faced with…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Milgram's Experiment

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Milgram’s Experiment was conducted by Social psychology by the name of Stanley Milgram, he created this experiment on how being in the presents of an authority figures would affect the way people behaved. This study was conducted in July 1969, just one year after the trial of Eichmann in Jerusalem. Milgram developed this experiment to answer the question "Could it be that Eichmann and his millions of accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Could we call them all accomplices?" (The Milgram Experiment by Saul McLeod published 2007)…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    He set out to prove that individuals would obey with the request of authority figures. McLeod in his summary states, “Milgram was interested in researching how far people would go in obeying an instruction if it involved harming another person. Stanley Milgram was interested in how easily ordinary people could be influenced into committing atrocities for example, Germans in WWII.” (McLeod, The Milgram Experiment, 2007) The experiment was carried out by asking participants/teachers to deliver a series of electrical shocks to another person when a question was answered incorrectly. Also, if a mistake was made, the teacher could deliver an increased voltage level to the student. The general findings were that individuals who were going to disobey were those who responded not to the learner’s cries of pain but to the learners request to be set free. People are more likely to obey if there is an authority figure there to take the blame. “The power of legitimate, close-at-hand authorities is dramatically apparent in stories of those who complied with orders to carry out the atrocities of the Holocaust, and those who didn’t.” (Social Psychology) Milgram’s experiment further proves that obedience plays a major part in behavior and people are going to do what is necessary to fit…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays