Preview

Milgram Experiment: Administrating A Shock To A Students

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
499 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Milgram Experiment: Administrating A Shock To A Students
Imagine yourself being shocked as an act of you incorrectly answering a question. In the Milgram Experiment, 40 men were recruited using newspaper ads in order to preform a test that would question human obedience. The question posed was: would they comply with an authority figures commands because they were stressed to, or would they comply because they thought it was the noble thing to do? The results clearly show that under authority, people will comply with what they are told to do even if they don't agree with it. Opening, obviously under certain circumstances people will change how they behave. In this experiment, participants were put under immense stress because of what they had to do. They played the role of a "teacher," administrating a shock to a "student" each time they answered one of their questions incorrectly. The shock level was told to be raised the more the student failed, starting at 30 volts and increasing in 15-volt increments all the way to 450 volts. The "teacher" believed it was real, but in actuality the "students" were all acts pretending to be shocked. Most of the participants asked the experiment if they should continue or not after a while. Each time, a series of replies would be followed, such as "Please continue. The experiment requires that …show more content…
During the Miller Experiment, it was said that the participants "..became extremely agitated, distraught..."(Article 1 Paragraph 10) If a person who overpowered you was insisting you to do something, it is most likely that you would. If you didn't, consequences might occur. The participants in the experiment might also not want to come off as looking bad to the authority figure, which in this case was Yale ... "...the study was sponsored by Yale (a trusted and authoritative academic institution...)"(Article 1 Paragraph 14) With this, the participants complied out of fear of the authority

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Replicating Milgram (The Open University, 2014), Milgram explains how he set up his obedience experiment. His aim was to get a volunteer, a ‘teacher’ to inflict increasing amounts of pain, through electric shocks, to another volunteer a ‘learner’ and to see when the ‘teacher’ would turn to the researcher, the ‘authority figure’ and ask to stop. Unknown to ‘the teacher’, the ‘learner’ and the ‘authority figure’ were aware of the real purpose of the experiment; the ‘teacher’ was told it was to study the effect of punishment on learning, and genuinely thought that they were inflicting pain on the ‘learner’ sat in another room. It was this deception and the emotional stress it generated to the ‘teacher’ that prompted the ethical issues debate…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    milgrams obedience study

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I set up a simple experiment at Yale University to test how much pain an ordinary citizen would inflict on another person simply because he was ordered to by an experimental scientist. Stark authority was pitted against the subjects' [participants'] strongest moral imperatives against hurting others, and, with the subjects' [participants'] ears ringing with the screams of the victims, authority won more often than not. The…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nearly half a century after they were conducted, Milgram’s (1963, 1965, 1974) obedience studies remain among psychology’s most widely known and most often discussed experiments. Briefly, under the guise of a learning study, an experimenter instructed participants to administer increasingly powerful electric shocks to a ‘‘learner’’ when the learner made mistakes on a memory task. Although in reality no shocks were delivered, participants were instructed to start with a 15-volt shock for the learner’s first mistake and to increase the voltage in 15-volt increments for each successive mistake. In the basic procedure (Experiment 5), participants could hear the learner’s vocal protests and demands to be set free through the wall that separated…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    100 Chapter 2 Study Guide

    • 815 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The social psychologist who used electrical shock in his experiments in order to find out how far people would go in obeying the commands of an authority figure is:…

    • 815 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    draft5 1

    • 1345 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “The Perils of Obedience” was an experiment done by Stanley Milgram concentrating on the conflict between obedience to the authority and individual’s self. Milgram created a threatening shock generator with starting level of 30 volts and expanding up to 450 volts. The experiment was set up with having an experimenter, a participant who was the subject, and a confederate pretending to be a volunteer. The teachers were told to ask questions from the learners and every time they gave a wrong answer, an electric shock was given and was increased 15 volt on each wrong answer. As the experiment advanced, the participants heard the learners argue to be discharged and complained about their heart condition.…

    • 1345 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the experiment, the subject is told by the experimenter to give shocks from a scale of low to dangerously high to the person in the electric chair (who was an actor) when they give a wrong answer. The shocks were not real, but prior to the experiment, the subjects were given a small shock to influence them that the shocks in the experiment were true. After the experiment, Milgram assesses that “between the command and the outcome, there is a paramount force, which is the subject’s capacity for choosing their own behaviour” (p. 851). Although there were people who acted in immoral ways and increased the shock levels, there were also those who chose to renounce the unjust commands of authority, “providing affirmation of human morals and ideals” (p. 851). Therefore, people do have a choice in refusing to abide by authority’s rules and demands, but they choose not to because they do not want to suffer the…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate Milgram's Study

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Psychologists such as Orne & Holland (1968) claim that participants in psychological studies have learned to mistrust researchers as they believe the true aims of the study may be hidden. In Milgrams research this means that participants may not truly have believed they were giving the learner electric shocks, and that this is the real reason for the high percentage. However, Milgram challenged this by interviewing…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The teacher is to give a pair of words to the learner, then the teacher is to repeat the first word and the learner is to repeat the second word that matches from the list of choice the teacher gives. For every question the learner answers incorrectly, he is to receive a “mild” electric shock, starting from 15 volts and increased by 15 per wrong answer up a maximum shock of 450 volts. The teachers did not know that there were no shocks and the procedure was perfectly safe. For every time a participant would refuse to continue on with the experiment, the scientist would give four different orders every time. The first order is “please continue,” the second is “the experiment requires you to continue,” the third is “it is absolutely essential that you continue,” and the last is “you have no other choice but to continue” (McLeod,…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the circumstances of the experiment were changed, and the teacher could choose the level of shock administered to the learner the results were drastically different. The teacher's hardly ever went beyond the minimum pain threshold. The only difference was the presence of the authority figure. This shows that people find it easier to disregard morals when…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prior to the experiments, Milgram sought predictions about the outcome from psychiatrists, college sophomores, middle-class adults, graduate students and faculty in behavioral sciences. All thought the teachers would refuse to obey the experimenter. The majority of the teachers would show concern once the learners began showing signs of discomfort. However, 60 percent of them followed the orders until the end, administering shocks to the learner up to 450 volts. (para. 27) The findings were dismissed as having no relevance to “ordinary” people considering the subjects used were students of Yale. Colleagues of Milgram claimed that these students were highly aggressive and competitive when provoked. (para. 27)…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Respondents were being informed that the experiment would analyze how being punished could have an effect on learning aptitude. Three individuals would be involved in the experiment, one person who would be the “experimenter”, one person who would be the “teacher” and one person who would be the “learner.” The experimenter was in charge of the entire experiment, giving orders to the teacher when they were hesitant to perform their duties, and would continuously remind the teacher that they must continue the trial, even when they began to feel uncomfortable with their part in the experiment. The role of experimenter would be filled by someone who was completely aware of the experiment, and would try their best to keep the experiment going for as long as they could. The teacher was meant to listen and obey the rules of the experimenter and deliver unpleasant stimuli to the learner when ordered to by the experimenter. The learner was supposed to memorize word pairings and then answer questions about these word pairings to the best of…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    His study of obedience was done in a lab in Yale University and the experimenter wore a long grey coat which reinforced his authority and status. Then the learner who was the teachers were told to be executing was a man with a heart condition who complained as they went on and then said he couldn’t take any more. Too see if the learners conformed they used prods such as ‘please go on’ and the experiment requires you to carry on’ although they didn’t have too.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How evil are we? Imagine being able to tell if someone was evil or good. In “The Milgram Experiment” they prove they can prove whether people are evil or good. In the test they have volunteer teachers come and help the learner learn.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There were a lot of things unethical about this experiment. The main one being that the participants were lied to be about what they were participating in. As a researcher, it was Milgram's job to invent an experiment were his hypothesis could be tested but also were participants would be informed of what they were participating in. This leads to the unethical issue that this experiment caused most of the participant’s extreme distress, which was an indirect result of them being lied to about the experiment. The fact they that also used the Yale campus and the Yale name of the fliers is also unethical since the article stated that Yale had no hand in the experiment, particularly as a safeguard should the experiment…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When asked to continue administering shocks the teachers would tend to obey the orders from the experimenter allowing the experimenter to act through them and causing them to Enter an agentic state. “People will obey an authority when they believe that the authority will take responsibility for the consequences of their actions”(Milgram 3). When the teachers did not administer a shock they were read a series of prods in order to ensure the authority of the experimenter as well as giving responsibility to the experimenter. “When participants were reminded that they had responsibility for their own actions, almost none of them were prepared to obey”( Milgram 3). When the teachers were faced with the responsibility of their actions none of them were willing to proceed with the experiment, but when relieved of responsibility of actions the teachers entered an agentic state allowing an obedience to the…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays