Preview

Mgt 426 Resistance To Change Paper

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2003 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mgt 426 Resistance To Change Paper
Resistance to Change
MGT/426
Resistance to Change
One of the many attributes that contribute to the lack of a successful implementation of a change within an organization is the “resistance to change”. As with any form of resistance, resistance to change is something that can bring about a strong response. Many experts refer to the resistance to change as a cancer within the organization, and the main killer of progress and good-intentions. While change and resistance to change will be analyzed in many different ways, simply put, the resistance to change will be the number problem when an organization attempts to change something, and some resistance can “poison” the whole process (Palmer, Dunford, & Akin, 2006, Pg. 145).
Positive Change
…show more content…
(Rock, 2008)
Managing Resistance and Change: Lewin’s Change Model Management So far, we have identified reasons and factors for resistance to change, and even positive factors of change. Change is a common in the new business world, whereas the world has slowly merged in to a competitive and cutthroat global economic environment. This leads to changes within every industry, because without change, the competition will leave you struggling to survive. The concept of change management is something in nearly every business today, but how businesses manage this change varies dependent upon the business, the change, and the people involved. One of the biggest factors in change and change management depends on how much people within the organization understand the change process (Mind Tools, 2012).
Lewin’s Model One of the cornerstone models for understanding organizational change was a development by a physicist and social scientist Kurt Lewin in the 1940’s. His change model is Unfreeze – Change – Refreeze, which describes the three phases of change. The Lewin model is best shown in an analogy of changing the shape of a block of
…show more content…
In order to make the changes needed to get the cone of ice, you have to make it amendable to change, or unfreeze it. Then, you must mold the water into the shape you want, or change. Finally, you must solidify the new change, or refreeze. By looking at change as a process with different stages, management can prepare for what is coming versus jumping in blindly, and manage the transition.
Unfreeze
The first stage (unfreezing) involves preparing the entire organization that change is a necessary, and breaking down the existing status quo so that you can begin to build a new way of operations. The main element of this of this stage is a compelling argument showing why the existing way of doing business is no longer feasible. This information can include evidence such as declining sales, poor financial results, or declining customer satisfaction. These figures can show elements that have to change in a way that everyone can understand. To do this successfully, you have to challenge the beliefs, attitudes, values, culture, and behaviors that define the organization. Consider this step an analogy of a building; you must be prepared to change the existing foundation that holds it up if you intend to add more stories. If you skip this step, the whole building will risk collapsing on itself. By making the organization re-examine its core structure, you essentially

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Managers and employees may be resistance to change because it disrupts their comfort level with their processes, procedures, and daily tasks. People become experts in their area with the software programs they use, tasks they complete, and the service they provide. Changes that touch any or all of these areas can be unsettling and can contribute to the negative behavior associated to change. Other factors that contribute to resistance is that some employees are uncomfortable with…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Generally, the implementation of change is for the good of the organization. However with change comes resistance. There are two major forces for resistance to change; individual and organizational. A few individual forces of resistance would include:…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Spector states (2010), the three stages theory of change is composed of the first step, or unfreezing is about getting ready for a change. This would be preparing the staff to get ready for the EMR change. The next step is called moving, and it is the step where the change actually occurs. This can be the hardest stage for the staff that is changing. People can be unsure or even fearful during this time. This is the time when the management team steps in and brings in education, and reassurance to the staff that is changing. The final step is called refreezing. This happens after the changes have been made and been accepted. This is where they create a new ‘normal’ within the organization. This can take time. Through the process of this change management needs to reinforce the change to keep it going in the future as the new normal. Reassurance is also needed. This process would best explain the implementation change from paper charting to the use of…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    U010A1 Final Paper

    • 3116 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Change management entails thoughtful planning, sensitive implementation and involvement of the people affected by the change. Since managing change in organizations requires adhering to personal as well as the organizational needs of the people involved in the change, it should be holistic, achievable and measurable. Utilizing these principles of change will require reevaluating how we propose change management strategies as it relates to business decisions and processes. If you force change on people, problems will arise and resistance to change processes will build (businessballs.com).…

    • 3116 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    change is inevitable as without change there can be no improvement. In today’s technological society the pace of change is rapid and businesses need to keep up with new processes, applications and ideas. Reasons for resistance of change: resistance to change is the perception that a change will threaten an individual or group. Managers often view resistance to change…

    • 5968 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theoretical Matrix

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This week’s studies were an examination of organizational and individual barriers to change. We learn to identify the role of strategic renewal, the behavioral aspect of organizational change, analyzed the dynamic of motivating employee behavioral change, differentiated the three faces of change, and finally explored the sources of employee resistance. A primary focus was Lewin’s Field Theory in Social Sciences and for this paper identified three theoretical organization change models.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    week 4

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Managers and lower level employees have different objectives and responsibilities within an organization. Ultimately managers and employees work towards a similar general goal of completing tasks to generate more revenue for a business. Having a successful business relies on more than managers and employees oiling the wheel of change. A fruitful business also depends on two change agents; human and non- human change agents. When combating change it can be difficult for managers to overcome confrontation and find supportive avenues to unexpected problems. However, by understanding, factoring, implementing and utilizing the change management process will help ensure the success of any business when change is in demand (Akin, Dunford, & Palmer, 2006).…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    change is essential to any establishment so as to survive, remain competitive in today’s market, and for continued success (Anderson and Anderson, 2010; Wittig, 2012). In most literatures (Bovey and Hede, 2001; Yılmaz and Kılıçoğlu, 2013) concerning leadership and management, concept of ‘change’ has been defined as a process which involves going from the known to the unknown. In this regard, it is hard for employees to adapt to change at most organizations (Ravichandran and Piramuthu, 2012), therefore, employee resistance is inevitable, and management must be well equipped to deal with it (Baker, 1989 cited Fine, 1986).…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although change has become commonplace in modern organizations, the reported failure rates of change implementation range from 40% to as high as 70% (McKay et al., 2013). Considering our global economy and technological innovation, this rate is alarmingly high. It is no surprise that these statistics have prompted researchers to investigate the causes underlying change failure in modern organizational settings (McKay et al., 2013). Employee resistance has been identified as a primary source of change implementation failure across a range of organizations and industries worldwide (McKay et al., 2013). Change is a situation that interrupts normal patterns of organization and calls for participants to enact new patterns, involving interplay of deliberate and emergent processes that can be highly ambiguous for everyone involved (Ford et al., 2008). Employees resist change for a variety of more or less logical reasons (Baack, 2012). These reasons will be explored to understand the external and internal factors of change within organizations. In addition, a scenario will be presented to analyze how change was introduced, perceived, and implemented at a real life organization.…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    For many years, the world of business has experienced an increasing rate of change. Alvin Toffler (1970) predicted the trend several decades ago. Toffler also noted that people exhibit a natural tendency to resist change. This resistance to change is a major organizational challenge that organizations must learn to manage. As individuals respond to change in different ways, and as variations in responses produce different outcomes the recognition of this resistance to change is an essential step in the development and implementation of effective change management strategies. Change, positive or negative, is unsettling because people seek stability. Certain individuals are more resistant to change than others, at times there can be situational characteristics such as a lack of trust in management contributing to this resistance to change. Often this resistance to change is out of self interest, at stake can be factors such as income, job security, prestige, power, and personal convenience. Low tolerance for change, lack of trust in management, and self interest are all factors which result in resistance to change. However my experience suggests that lack of understanding of the need for change can be the single greatest contributing factor and is the factor which the organization has the greatest control over.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Don T Produce Change Paper

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages

    These principles fundamentally laid out the vision, creates the energy around the change, illuminates the central objectives of the change, prioritize themes around the change and creates a central figure or management team to deliver messages about the change. However, the change process takes immense planning and concrete tools in responding proactively to future events of reorientation (Jick & Peiperl,…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Force Field Analysis: Driving Forces Field Analysis: Driving Forces KURT LEWIN’S CHANGE THEORY By: Mandeep Chahal & Arvinder Khaira Mandeep Chahal Arvinder Khaira DRIVING FORCE Driving Forces are forces that push in a direction that causes change to occur. They cause a shift in the equilibrium towards change change.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Change Initiative

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Organizational change is a necessary outcome when considering various scenarios contributing to the resulting vision. Perplexing as it may seem, change initiatives don’t always result in positive outcomes. In fact, many never succeed. As a change agent, one should always have formulated a vision of what change will “look” like for the organization. One would be hard pressed to paint a landscape without having a vision of what the landscape should resemble. Yet, resistance to change usually becomes a significant factor contributing to an initiative’s failure. It is likely an implicit expectation to prepare for the advent of resistance and it consequences. A change agent’s tool box should contain a number of strategies which will support the process of change. Defining and re-defining the end result as well as the change process itself is a useful exercise in that clarity eventually overcomes obscure, poorly orchestrated attempts at invoking change. This paper will propose a change initiative designed for LC- an organization referenced previously in part I of a continuing anthology of LC’s attempts at facing change. Resistance to change will be examined within the context of how certain attributes of any successful change process operate to support or derail attempts at managing a successful change initiative.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This model is based on the theory that planned organizational change can occur by changing the behavior and attitudes of employees. These changes occur from three distinct stages. The first stage of this model is about getting ready to change. It involves getting to a point of understanding that change is necessary and getting ready to move away from the status quo. The second stage is to change what needs to be changed. This is a challenging stage because people are unsure and fearful of making the actual change. The third stage is about making the change permanent once the changes in stages one and two have been made. Within stage one of this model, Lewin developed a tool called the force field analysis to help organizations analyze certain aspects of changes that may lead to resistance [ (Kurt Lewin Change Management Model, 2008-2010)…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    While some resistance to change is inevitable, most resistance can be managed and actually is beneficial. In order to manage resistance to change, managers must first understand what attributes to the resistance and how the resistance is beneficial. Resistance to change can be healthy, because it forces you to check your assumptions and clarify what you are doing, as well as how you are planning to achieve it. The many reasons for resistance are explored and practical solutions, based on findings of research studies, are offered.…

    • 2743 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics