Medieval Weapons Research Paper

4/2/13
Medieval Weapons Research Paper
During the Middle Ages, many battles and wars ignited an arms race between many medieval kingdoms. Hand to hand combat weapons were the most popular and were always advancing. Ranged weapons were deadly to front line opponents and could later on pierce armor. Siege weapons were the most essential in order to capture a castle or village and were constantly evolving. Medieval Weapons were deadly and dangerous, and were classified into three main groups: Combat weapons, Ranged weapons, and Siege weapons.
In Medieval battles, hand to hand combat weapons were deadly, and were common throughout all ranks in an army. During the Middle ages, “Swords and Daggers were the most common weapons in hand-to-hand combat”
According to Linda Alchin, “Lower classes and foot soldiers mostly used ranged shooting weapons.” Bows were very effective weapons and could take down an approaching line of soldiers from a distance. Medieval bows “were constructed in two parts, with firm wood that could withstand the tension of 4 men pulling back with all their strength” (Alchin). With all the tension they could withstand, a man could send an arrow flying with enough momentum to pierce the outer chest plate of a knight. The weapon was so effective, “By 1252 AD, all men able to carry a bow were required to wield one” (Alchin). Another great weapon that was similar to the bow was the crossbow. These weapons were mechanical and all an operator had to do was load, aim and fire. The crossbow could send an arrow at a far greater velocity than a normal bow could, and could now pierce a knight’s armor. This weapon was quite dangerous compared to other weaponry at the time, and many unsuccessful attempts were made to ban the weapon (Weapons). One of the most powerful ranged weapons during the Medieval Ages was the cannon. By the 1400s, cannons could fire cannonballs weighing 800 pounds, which was brought the downfall of Constantinople (“Weapons”). Ranged weapons such as bows, crossbows, and cannon brought great military advantages in
Sieges were usually laid on large villages or towns, and would often cut of the supply of food and water into the city. As the city weakened, “attackers would try to get over the walls using ladders, siege towers and grapples” (McDonald). In order to prevent this from happening, “arrow slits, concealed doors for sallies and deep water wells were integral for resisting siege” (McDonald). The only way a siege could be prevented was to stop it before it happened, which was hard. Attackers would try to undermine the walls, and would sometimes succeed, but the mines would most likely collapse (Alchin). Sometimes the mines would not be able to stand the weight of the walls. The enemies then turned to more direct methods and would try to ram the door down with a battering ram (Alchin). It was essential to cover siege towers, ladders, and battering rams with wet animal skins. Since they were all made out of wood, they could easily be set on fire by an enemy (Fowler 8). However, when stone started to be used, this was not needed. After the enemies got through the walls and in the city, they would be able to conquer it. Siege warfare was quite effective, but it was a multi-step process that could go wrong anywhere. However, if it was done properly, would give satisfying results, which was why Sieges were one of the most significant types of warfare during