Preview

Medicolegal Malpractice Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
110 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Medicolegal Malpractice Analysis
For the forensic pathologist, medicolegal malpractice assessments are an important part of his work. To act as an expert witness, he must have “a sufficient knowledge, education, training, or experience regarding the specific issue before the court to give a reliable opinion on a relevant issue”. For an expert testimony, the following conditions have to be proven:

a. The assessment of damage
b. The direct causality
c. If the injury is the consequence of mistaken conduct
d. The adequacy of the causal connection
e. The objective foreseeability (i.e. “the quality of care that would be expected of a reasonable practitioner in similar circumstances”)
f. The subjective foreseeability of the risk

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the case of Peterson v. Donahue, Neal Peterson sued David Donahue for negligence after a ski collision that occurred while both parties were on the ski slopes. Eleven year old Peterson was coming down the slopes very fast when he collided with forty three year old, advanced skier, Donahue who was skating across the slope toward the parking lot. Donahue saw Peterson seconds before the impact which knocked him out of his skis ten to twelve feet down the slope and knocked Peterson unconscious. Peterson sought recovery for the accident by filing a suit in the Minnesota State Court against Donahue alleging negligence.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lisa is a candidate that has years of experience working with claims and has a good understanding of medical billing as well.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. Charles Smith a once highly respected forensic pathologist who was praised for his work, now his reputation has been tarnished and his work has been proven to be a sham. He started his work in 1978 at the Toronto Hospital for Sick Children and was considered to be the leading expert in his field. Dr. Smith’s expert testimony on the cause of death in children lead to numerous criminal convictions. However during a review of 45 autopsies that Dr. Smith performed on children there had been some serious errors found made by the doctor in 20 of those cases. The findings of errors lead to the cases to be reopened which resulted in many overturns of convictions and has led to further inquiries into more cases where Dr. Smith gave expert testimony…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Negligence Case Study

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mary is cutting weeds at her home. She is unable to trim some weeds she finds, because they grew between the rocks, so she removes the protective guard on the weed trimmer and trims the weeds. There are no warnings on the weed trimmer advising against removing the guard. She hits a rock, which is thrown to the side, hitting her neighbor in the eye and causing permanent damage. What kind of tort claim does the neighbor have? Who are the possible defendants?…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to review ways to reduce the cost of health care. This paper will…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paralegal Malpractice

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sally can suggest that Molly talk to her (Sally’s) attorney that she works with and set up an appointment with them to talk to them and see what they can do about her problem with her doctor and her knee surgery. As Molly doesn’t have any money, Sally can help her by helping her find someone who does Pro-bono cases for malpractice. Sally can tell her whether or not she has a good case but she can’t really tell her what to do, where to go, or even what papers to file to start the case. If she were to tell Molly what to do, where to go, or even what papers to file to start the case she could get into serious trouble for UPL’s (un authorized practice of law). As a paralegal, Sally can’t establish client-attorney relationships, set legal fees, give opinions or advice that involve legal matters, or even represent Molly before the court with her case. These things listed are called UPL’s. If an attorney messes with the UPL’s the consequences could be being reprimanded, which is being firmly scolded. She could be suspended, which is temporarily being unable to practice as a paralegal for a short time. Sally could even be Disbarred, which means being unable to practice as a paralegal in any law firm forever. Sally could even be imprisoned for messing with the UPL’s. If sally were to become imprisoned, it could bar her chances of ever being able to get a job in any other field that she chooses. There is also a civil liability for negligence, and criminal liability.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    7. The damages and losses sustained by the Plaintiff were directly and proximately caused by the negligence in carelessness of the Defendant, their agents, servants and/or employees, in one or more of the following ways:…

    • 1746 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Forensic psychology is a field that combines both psychology and the law. Advancements in technology have accelerated created tremendous popularity for this science. Furthermore the media, who has become obsessed with forensics, through television shows movies and books, depicting heroes solving mysteries in under an hour. While depictions of forensic psychologist are popular and dramatic, the media does not portray an accurate definition of this science. Typically, a forensic psychologist deals with both areas: psychology and law. In many cases, people working within forensic psychology are not necessarily “forensic psychologists.” These individuals might be school psychologists, neurologist or counselors who lend their psychological experience to provide testimony, analysis or recommendations in legal or criminal cases.Forensic psychologists usually deals with clients who are not there of their own free will. Due to this forensic psychologist face great difficulty in making assessments, diagnosis and treatment plans. (Cherry, 2009)…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    1.06 Review

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Criteria used to establish an expert witness might be the person’s degrees, and the number of years of experience that that person has in the field…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to ‘Victorian institute of forensic medicine (Unknown)’, the role of the forensic pathologist is to assist the coroners, the police and courts to resolve any medical issues deemed critical. This includes causes of death, the circumstances on how the victim had died and how the injuries were caused. The pathologist focuses their work on deceased people. The examination of a dead body focuses on review of medical histories, external examination and CT scans. Sometimes internal examinations are performed to help determine a cause of death. The pathologist can be helped in a wide range of forensic science services such as toxicology, DNA testing and microbiology. In a larger view the pathologist’s role is focused on public health.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judge Lipitt Observation

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I go into Judge Lippitt’s courtroom knowing that it is going to be the same trial I was observing my first day but that I had missed a trial day. I still knew the big picture of the case so it was interesting to see it continue. The trial started off with expert witnesses the first one was called by the defense counsel. The expert witness was a doctor the defense counsel first asked him questions to establish the credibility of the witness. The defense counsel then asked his witness if he looked at the plaintiffs’ MRI and x-rays and he said yes. Then, the defense council continued asking if the expert found anything when looking at the plaintiffs’ physicians image examination he used the term “degenerate findings”. The expert reviewed the x-rays…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    False, Once a physician offered by the prosecution as an expert witness testifies to his or her qualifications, cross-examination as to those qualifications by the defense is not permitted.…

    • 6041 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A succinct definition of the term is essential to demystify these expected ‘outcomes’, so that care professionals are clear about what it is that they do and how those things that they do, if they do them well, inevitably result in an outcome.…

    • 2395 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Negligence Case

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Some believe that a “conspiracy of silence” among physicians makes them reluctant to testify against other members of the profession, and if a physician is not a party to the lawsuit, she cannot be forces to testify. Evidence other than expert opinion is admissible in some instances to prove negligence, however, and occasionally even the defendant physician may provide the needed expert testimony.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Medical malpractice lawsuits are startlingly common and result from a number of reasons. Doctors and medical specialists can make medical errors, missed diagnoses, drug errors and miss test results (Lovenberg, 2015). Doctors can also make surgical errors and anaesthesia mistakes (Lovenberg, 2015). Unfortunately, all of these failures can result in serious injury and often death. Malpractice tort law is a Constitutional right and provides a means for individuals who have suffered from medical negligence to receive reparation for compensatory damages (Lau & Johnson, 2014). However, defendants in these numerous cases disagree with the tort laws and have successfully and unsuccessfully argued for reform…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays