Preview

Marketing-Generic Strategies

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2095 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marketing-Generic Strategies
Introduction. In this assignment I am going to explain the following concepts, generic strategies, alternative directions and alternative methods. Indeed, I would like to support these concepts by referring my work to the automobile sector (as a continuing line provided with the Morgan´s example in class). I am going to use the example of General Motors and Ford, they are well known and also provide us a long struggling and interesting history. The first part of my assignment gives a theoretical view of different concepts (using several examples) that are used in my assignment and, of course, in the real management world. Afterwards, I am going to explain different aspects of the US automobile industry. Finally, I would like to give some advises to each company. Theoretical assumptions. Once I have explained the structure of my assignment, I would like to emphasise the fact that the Strategic Choice is the core of strategy management in a company, because is concerned with decisions about its future and the way that it is going to respond to the pressures and influences from its rivals. Each company has to know how to develop its own strategy; therefore, it has to answer the following questions: • What basis? • Which direction? • How? As an exhibit that we can see in the Johnson and Scholes book, we can explain Development Strategies as: Bases of choice − Corporate purpose and aspirations − SBU generic competitive strategies − The role of the corporate parent Alternative directions − Protect and build − Market penetration − Product development − Market development − Diversification: related or unrelated Alternative methods − Internal development − Acquisition − Joint development / alliances

When answering the question of: What Basis?, we can use the concept of Generic Strategies (M. E. Porter), that includes the following options: • Cost leadership: consists of producing items or services more cheaply than other companies. But this idea does not mean that low

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Determining the Porter’s five-point theory on competitive structure is important for a company to survive the stock market competition. The project analysis is based on General Motor’s Company, which has seen ups and downs in its illustrious history. The establishment or entry into the automotive market wasn’t a difficult task for GM. The company’s financial situation was hit with severe competition from foreign rivals and its internal regional alliances. The other external factor that resulted in GM’s bankrupt situation is recession period. Applying, generic decision making strategies made the company recover its lost status and currently leading its way in design, build and selling of cars and trucks. Bargaining stakeholders to elevate the production values is one of the strategies of GM to become global…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    capsim strategies

    • 2515 Words
    • 9 Pages

    A Broad Cost Leader strategy maintains a presence in all segments of the market. The company will gain a competitive advantage by keeping R&D, production and material costs to a minimum, enabling the company to compete on the basis of price, which will be below average. Automation levels will be increased to improve margins and to offset second shift/overtime costs.…

    • 2515 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    3. There are countless variations in the competitive strategies that companies employ, mainly because each company’s strategic approach entails custom-designed actions to fit its own circumstances and industry environment. 4. The biggest and most important differences among competitive strategies boil down to: a. whether a company’s market target is broad or narrow or…

    • 4409 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Academy of Management Executive , 9 (3), 45-57. Grant, R. M. (2010). Contemporary Strategy Analysis. London: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Lynch, R. (2003). Corporate Strategy (Third Edition ed.). New York: Prentice Hall Financial Times. McGahan, A. M. (2004). How Industries Change. Harvard Business Review , 82 (10), 86-94. Miller, D. (1986). Configurations of strategy and structure: Towards a synthesis. Strategic Management Journal , 7 (3), 233-249. Osgeowitsch, T., & Goelz, M. (2011). ALDI in Australia. University of Melbourne , 13. Parnell, J. A. (1997). New evidence in the generic strategy and business performance debate: A research note. British Journal of Management. , 8, 175-181. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy . Free Press. Porter, M. E. (1996). What is Strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74 (6), 62. Porter, M. E. (2008). The Five Forces that Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review , 86 (1), 78-93.…

    • 4432 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The three generic strategies identified by Michael Porter, namely cost leadership, differentiation and focus are all options available to small businesses. cost leadership requires a tight set of interrelated tactics that include aggressive construction of efficient-scale facilities; vigorous pursuit of cost reductions from experience; tight cost and overhead control; avoidances of marginal customer accounts; cost minimization in all activities in the firms value chain. Differentiation is the strategy of differentiation consists of creating difference in the firm's product or service offering by creating something that is perceived industry wide as unique and valued by customers. Focus is based on the choice of narrow competitive scope within an industry.…

    • 944 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marketing strategy

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The biggest advantage that FedEx had over UPS high speed internet tracking system that provides easier and better tracking service for all customers including large businesses. UPS did not have this technology the time FedEx had it, UPS only had their trucking service meanwhile FedEx invested in their tracking systems as well as their air delivery system that contain tracking systems too.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Harley Davidson

    • 6089 Words
    • 25 Pages

    When choosing a strategy, an organisation may decide to pursue one course of action instead of others (Hitt et al, 2009). Any process of choice could be rationally divided into four steps – identify options, evaluate the options against preference criteria, select the best option and then take action. An evaluation of strategic options or choices would be in response to the strategic position an organisation enjoys relative to its competitors, the opportunities and threats in the firms’ external environment, its capabilities, stakeholder expectations, history and cultural context. The fundamental objective of any strategy would be to gain strategic competitiveness and earn above-average returns and demonstrate a shared understanding of the organisation’s vision and mission (Hitt et al, 2009) as sound strategic choices are the foundation on which successful strategies are built (Ireland and Miller, 2005).…

    • 6089 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Glo Bus

    • 2662 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Porter (1985), “An overall cost leadership strategy is adopted when an organisation seeks to achieve the lowest costs within an industry and targets its products or services at a broad market” (Sircar2011)…

    • 2662 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Michael Porter, management must select a competitive strategy that will give it a distinct advantage by capitalizing on the strengths of the organization and the industry it is in. He has argued that a firm's strengths ultimately falls into either cost advantage or differentiation, which applied either broadly or narrowly results in three generic strategies: cost leadership, differentiation, and focus. They are called generic strategies because they are not firm or industry dependent and are applied at the business unit level.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Robin Hood Case Study

    • 3104 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Robin Hood and his band of Merrymen is the subject of this case study. Throughout this study, Robin Hood will find several problems that face the group and several possible solutions to these problems. We will treat this group as genuine business in need of strategic direction.…

    • 3104 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    A firm positions itself by leveraging its strengths. Michael Porter has argued that a firm 's strengths ultimately fall into one of two headings: cost advantage and differentiation. By applying these strengths in either a broad or narrow scope, three generic strategies result: cost leadership, differentiation, and focus. These strategies are applied at the business unit level. They are called generic strategies because they are not firm or industry dependent. The following table illustrates Porter 's generic strategies:…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Overall Cost Leadership

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Porter defines “Overall Cost Leadership” as the strategy in which a company differentiates from others by having the lowest prices of the market.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    In the next section, strategic groups operating in the Automobile industry will be identified and analyzed. A Strategy Canvas will be formulated and blue ocean space will be suggested.…

    • 3917 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Strategy Chapter 5

    • 5135 Words
    • 21 Pages

    The strategy clock It is important that students get a grasp of the basis of competitive strategy, and the strategy clock helps them to do this. However, they should not assume that these strategies are static. The questions here help them understand how the basis of competitive strategy may change over time. • Route 1 on the strategy clock may provide an opportunity for entry because large players may have vacated that space in the market as they try to add value rather than compete on price in what may have become commodity-type markets. In the specific instance of the car industry in the 1960s and 1970s, Western producers were operating with a relatively high cost base compared with Japanese entrants from what was then a low-cost producer nation. The result was that the Japanese did not face markedly higher quality competition, but they could readily compete on price. Trading up through routes 2 and 3, as the Japanese did, is an interesting phenomenon. Why did the market leaders not respond? Was this solely a function of the Japanese cost structure? Was it to do with the speed of innovation in Japanese firms? Or the inertia of existing market leaders? Entering through route 5 and moving elsewhere is discussed explicitly at the end of section 5.3.4. As is pointed out there, this entails a lowering of price, and therefore cost, while maintaining differentiating features. It also means moving from a focused approach to a less focused approach. Neither of these moves is easy, usually because the competences of the firm have become attuned to more focus and less emphasis on cost; but also because the market may well regard such a firm as segment specific and therefore be wary of such a move. Nissan was driven into position 8 from which it needed to re-position.. For example, if it tried to move to the hybrid position – differentiated but at lower prices (and, therefore, lower costs) – this requires the…

    • 5135 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Porter’s notion on “stuck in the middle” or “hole in the wall” is debatable, it being mutually exclusive. It might be true in some cases but not all the time. Even beyond Porter’s generic strategies, Toyota has been operating and already proven that it’s possible to be a low cost producer of a differentiated product. It was able to achieve leadership in North America, surpassing General Motors. They continuously find ways to reduce production costs and at the same optimize its process so that it could introduce new models faster than its competitors. They’re known for their Toyota Production System (TPS) which other vehicular companies were trying to mimic. This TPS is the main reason why there’s Just-In-Time (JIT) and Lean Manufacturing system in the manufacturing industry today. Toyota used these two manufacturing methods to gain competitive advantage over competitors. In JIT, Toyota build vehicles based on immediate market demands rather than anticipation on future market demands. There’s no overstocking. This strategy results in efficiency and quality. It is mentioned above that cost leadership gains competitive advantage through efficiency while differentiation gains its competitive advantage through quality. This is a proof that cost leadership and differentiation are not mutually exclusive. And so is true with Lean Manufacturing. Its concept is eliminating those processes that will not add value (differentiation) to the product that a customer is willing to pay (cost leadership) for.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays