Preview

Marine Insurance Act 1963

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
11413 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marine Insurance Act 1963
MARINE INSURANCE ACT 1963
THE MARINE INSURANCE ACT, 1963 ACT NO. 11 OF 1963 [18th April, 1963.] An Act to codify the law relating to marine insurance. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Fourteenth Year of the Republic of India as follows:-Short title and commencement. 1. Short title and commencement. (1) This Act may be called the Marine Insurance Act, 1963. (2) It shall come into force on such date 1* as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint. Definitions. 2. Definitions. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,-- (a) "contract of marine insurance" means a contract of marine insurance as defined by section 3; (b) "freight" includes the profit derivable by a ship-owner from the employment of his ship to carry his own goods or other movables, as well as freight payable by a third party, but does not include passage money; (c) "insurable property" means any ship, goods or other movables which are exposed to maritime perils; (d) "marine adventure" includes any adventure where-- (i) any insurable property is exposed to maritime perils; (ii) the earnings or acquisition of any freight, passage money, commission, profit or other pecuniary benefit, or the security for any advances, loans, or disbursements is endangered by the exposure of insurable property to maritime perils; (iii) any liability to a third party may be incurred by the owner of, or other person interested in or responsible for, insurable property by reason of maritime perils; (e) "maritime perils" means the perils consequent on, or incidental to, the navigation of the sea, that is to say, perils of the seas, fire, war perils, pirates, rovers, thieves, captures, seizures, restraints and detainments of princes and peoples, jettisons, barratry and any other perils which --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. 1st August 1963; vide Notification No. S. O. 1925, dated 8-7- 1963, see Gazette of India, Pt. II, Sec. 3(ii), p. 2183.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Merchant Marine Act of 1920- authorized the Shipping Board, which controlled 1500 vessels , to dispose of much of the war time fleet at bargain prices…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Craft Marine Case Summary

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The alternatives are: (there are several other budgeting methods, but we will not analyze all of them. I am looking for pros and cons in this section) x = multiplied by…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Yellowtail Marine, Inc. case focuses attention on the difficulties of Robyn Gilcrist, which is the newly appointed president, to efficiently managing the company’s daily operations while at the same time developing a corporate strategy.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every year, thousands of boating accidents happen in the United States. Out of this, 60 percent results in some kind of injury. Aside from accidents, boats also get stolen. This is why it is very important to get boat insurance. With all the dangers, it would be crazy not to get boat insurance.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * The third issue in the scenario is with respect to the transportation of goods by sea and the liability which arises thereof. The issue arises out of the third transaction between WCO and Thailand. Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992 and its application will be analysed.…

    • 3868 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law Assignment

    • 2505 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The concept of insurable interest and the alleged need under Scots law for the requirement of insurable interest by the insured in an insurance policy, have recently come under scrutiny. Why is this, and what should be done about the problems arising from the requirement for insurable interest? How realistic are the proposals for reform?…

    • 2505 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this case study, Patina is the seller and Luca is the buyer under an FOB (Free on Board) agreement. General picture of a FOB contract can be congregated from the case of Wimble & Sons v Rosenberg & Sons which describes it as a contract for the sale of goods where the seller which in this case is Patina who agrees to deliver the goods over the ship’s rail and the buyer or Luca in this stance agrees to convey it overseas. According to English law, the case of Pyrene v Scindia defines a classic FOB contract which has occurred in this case study between Patina and Luca as the seller (Patina) draws up the contract with Luca who then nominates a vessel. If the buyer in a FOB agreement fails to nominate a ship within the actual contracted time then the contract may stand effectively repudiated. The seller or Patina in this case would have been legally allowed to sell goods to a third party thus recovering any losses from the buyer. The Incoterms definition of a FOB is basically deprived of the seller being the shipper or transporter of the goods and the buyer’s duty is to nominate a vessel as it is described in Pyrene’s case. The main issue in this case is the transfer of risk from the seller (Patina) towards the seller (Luca). And furthermore it will be argued in regard to case law and statues.…

    • 1547 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The approval examines the business which the captive proposes to underwrite and is limited to those companies whose business consists solely of risks of their parent company. Although there is no minimal level of capitalisation laid down, the finance board looks at each case at its merit. The government of the Isle of Man created an attractive environment for all insurers, by the introduction of Exempt Insurance Company Act which became law in 1981. This was clearly framed with captive insurance company in mind. Since then, there have been more developments in the Isle of Man. The result has been a good deal of increase interest in new insurance companies coming to the island including captives. The list shows some captives found in Isle of…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Where the action is undefended, it used to be the case that any judgment would be limited to the value of the res itself. In the light of the reasoning of the House of Lords in The Indian Grace (No. 2), to the effect that, after service of in rem proceedings, the action proceeds as an action in personam, this is probably no longer the case. The claimant will be entitled to enforce the full amount of any judgement in respect of the in personam liability of the shipowner. Where no such liability has been incurred, however, the judgment will still be limited to the value of the res.”…

    • 2070 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Maritime Safety

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * “Flashpoint” is the temperature in degrees Celsius (closed cup test) at which a product will give off enough flammable vapour to be ignited, as determined by an approved flashpoint apparatus.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    OBJECTIVE- TO FIND OUT THE RELEVANCE OF INDEMNITY CONTRACTS IN INDIA AND OTHER COUNTRIES THROUGH PROPER ANALYSIS…

    • 2317 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    carrier immunities

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to Hague-Visby Rules, Article 1 (a), carriers include owner or the charterer who enters into a contract of carriage with the shipper. The carrier will not be liable for losses or damage to cargo if it falls under any of the circumstances stated in the carrier’s immunities. First, in the Art IV rule 1 if the carriers exercises due diligence, immunities will be given only against latent defects that is not discoverable on a reasonable inspection. Second, negligence in navigation or management of the ship as held in Art IV rule 2 where losses or damages to goods as a result of the act, neglect, default of master, mariner, pilot or servant of the carrier in navigation or management of the ship. Third, from Art IV rule 2 (b), carrier is excluded from liability to the loss or damage caused by fire unless is caused by the actual fault of the carrier. Perils of the sea, as in accordance to Art IV rule 2 (c), where perils of the sea is referring to any damage caused by pirates, storms, collision which could not have been avoided by exercise of reasonable care, the carriers will be given immunities. Fifth, any act which are independent from intervention of human being namely act of God that cannot be prevented, carrier is exempted from being liable to the damages of goods (Act IV Rule 2 d).…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bernabe Lim Professor of Maritime Laws, Cristal e – College. Brgy. Danao, Panglao, Bohol Work: (213) 555-8876 berntkevinlim@yahoo.com…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Esi Central Rules 1950

    • 11649 Words
    • 47 Pages

    2. Definitions. — In these rules, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context, —…

    • 11649 Words
    • 47 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Student

    • 2411 Words
    • 10 Pages

    b-If the Vessel comes into collision with another ship as a result of the negligence of the other ship and any act, neglect or default of the Master, Mariner, Pilot or the servants of the Carrier in the navigation or in the management of the Vessel, the owners of the cargo carried hereunder will indemnify the Carrier against all loss or liability to the other or non- carrying ship or her Owners in so far as such loss or liability represents loss of, or damage to, or any claim whatsoever of the owners of said cargo, paid or payable by the other or non-carrying ship or her Owners to the owners of said cargo and set-off, recouped or recovered by the other or non-carrying ship or her Owners as part of their claim against the carrying Vessel or Carrier. The foregoing provisions shall also apply where the Owners, operators or those in charge of any ship or ships or objects other than, or in addition to, the colliding ships or objects are at fault in respect of a collision or contact.[References: http://www.bimco.com/Corporate%20Area/Documents/Clauses/Both_to_Blame_Collision_Clause.aspx , The Baltic and International Maritime Council (BIMCO) organization, no author provided ]…

    • 2411 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays