Preview

Mao Tse-Tung and Karl Marx

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2325 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mao Tse-Tung and Karl Marx
Exploring the Concepts of Karl Marx and Mao Tse-Tung

Karl Marx believed that in an industrialized society, the working class, known as the proletariat would revolt and take over the ruling class, and would in effect, create a classless society. Karl Marx believed this could only happen in an industrialized society. Once it became apparent that the working class would not rise above, Lenin intervened and confirmed Marxism obsolete in Russia. Since the late 1920's the Chinese Communist Party has altered Marxism in China. It became a peasant party with an anti-Marxist petty-bourgeois viewpoint and through all the fluctuations of the left and right turns of world Stalinism, it kept a utopian and reactionary perspective; in Marxist terminology, reactionary refers to people whose ideas might appear to be socialist, but, in essence, contain elements of feudalism, capitalism, nationalism, fascism or other characteristics of the ruling class. It kept a nationally based and classless socialism, or "peasant socialism,” as worded by Trotsky. To call Mao Tse-Tung’s communist or Maoist, philosophy socialism is an understatement. Though encompassing many Marxist values, China has done a more effective job of forcing the Maoist agenda through more ruthless violence by utilizing the multitude of peasants residing within its borders as a powerful force, unlike Marxism which calls for a series of revolution by means of class struggle and uprising in the proletariat. Though the Maoist ideology had subsisted in China for some years after his time, today it is an important economic force, but is government-run, leaving it unstable without government regulation as the economy is dominated by large state-owned enterprises, but private enterprises also play a major role in the economy. State-owned enterprises are a major source of profit and power for members of the Communist Party of China and their families and are largely favored by the government.

Karl Marx wove economics and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    China thought the government should own and control everything, which goes against Marx’s ideas of the workers owning the factories.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxism and Mao

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. What specific development in Hunan province reinforced Mao’s convictions about the peasantry as a revolutionary force?…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx was developed his ideal of Communism world with the goal is to remove boundaries between rich and poor, high and low classes in both social and economic; to improving the low class lives and limit some of the high class assets by eliminating the ownership of property. By doing so, equal opportunities and better standard of living and health care can be achieved (Vincent 1996, 100). Lansford (2007, 190), stated that the communist government will take the profit that earned by companies and distributed equally in the society while companies keeping and using the property. Most of the key industries are actually belong to the communist government. For example, there are eight of tenth largest steel companies in China that are 100% owned and…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mao Zedong Dbq

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1. A) According to source A, Mao Zedong along with the Party Central Committee were able to efficiently construct a socialist system in China, within a very short period of time. Mao and the PCC were able to analyze the economy of China and develop a system called the Great Leap Forward, which would fix the problems that they had discovered. That system quickly transformed China into a self-sufficient country, which were able to function under a socialist system.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the communist manifesto, Marx divides society into two main classes, the bourgeoisie, who are the owners of the means of production and employers of wage labourers, and the wage labourers themselves, the proletariat working class. The bourgeoisie, he claims, by their very capitalist nature, exploit the proletariat workers by unfairly controlling the wealth and means of production, thus forcing the proletarians to sell their only real asset, their labour in order to survive. Marx then goes on to argue that the proletarians must revolt against the capitalist society that treats them so unjustly in order to equally distribute the wealth and power. He reinforces this by saying, "Not only has the bourgeoisie forged the weapons that bring death to itself; it has also called into existence the men who are to wield those weapons-the modern working class-the proletarians." (Ref. 2) and "Of all the classes that stand face to face with the bourgeoisie today, the proletariat alone is a really revolutionary class. The other classes decay and finally disappear in the face of Modern Industry; the proletariat is its special and essential product."(Ref 3) These statements would indicate that Marx regarded the proletarians to be the only revolutionary class under capitalism. But why does Marx regard them in this way?…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the primary principles of communist is that capitalism is characteristically awful and represented a risk to the common laborers. Meanwhile, “The capitalists believed there should be a free economy in which private individuals made most decisions” (Brookioh, 2012). The communists see every single entrepreneur country as conceivable foes. As indicated by them, capitalism will in the end crush itself and it is their obligation to help it along. They deny participation amongst themselves and capitalist countries ideologically.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 1 Sociology Notes

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Karl Marx’s class conflict theory states that the bourgeoisie (or the capitalists) are locked in conflict with the proletariat (the exploited workers). Marx believed that this conflict could only end when the working class united and violently broke free of the “bondage”. Once this happens, society will be classless and people will work according to their abilities, while receiving goods and services according to their needs. Although Marxism does propose revolution, it should not be confused with communism.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Communism vs Capitalism

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Since the beginning of the 20th century many countries have favored the economic system of communism over capitalism many political partys around the world that are communist based have the term “workers party”incuded in their name because communism is a system for the working class and capitalism is a competitive system for the upper class society to benefit. Communism was not envisioned by one person but molded and perfected by many one of the key contributors to the creation of communism was Karl Marx who wrote The Communist Manifesto which heavily criticized capitalism “The flaws Marx found in capitalism led him to believe that communism would create the best political, economic, and social situation for citizens in every society” (L.T., 1).In a totalitarian state ruled by communists one political party controls every aspect of the government mainly the economy instead of being able to grow or produce what you want the government would tell you what to grow and how much to grow thus decreasing competition among different corporations manufacturing and mass producing the same items or goods. By controlling the economy the people in a communist nation also are equal not separated by accumulated wealth .Many countries with newly formed communist regimes are often the result of a revolution inside the country or expansion by an already communist state countries like Russia,China,Cuba,Vietnam,North korea,Cambodia and many more because the people wanted a change in government that would benefit themselves and their country showing that communism is still a rising system in the modern world and that it is very successful economically socially and diplomatically overall communism is a system that will benefit a nations people economy and government over a extended period of time…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. King And Lao-Tzu

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages

    King and Lao-Tzu both had the same views but different actions. Their views consisted of eagerly wanting the world to become a better place. They wanted equal rights and righteous leaders. Their believes did not consist of taking sides. To them what really mattered was to have everyone be equally content. Even though King and Lao-tzu did not ever meet, there is thought to be a possibility that Dr. King could have read Lao-tzu’s writting. Thus they both believed in equality without violence.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx and Nietzsche

    • 4031 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Society is flawed. There are critical imbalances in it that cause much of humanity to suffer. In, the most interesting work from this past half-semester, The Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx is reacting to this fact by describing his vision of a perfectly balanced society, a communist society. Simply put, a communist society is one where all property is held in common. No one person has more than the other, but rather everyone shares in the fruits of their labors. Marx is writing of this society because, he believes it to be the best form of society possible. He states that communism creates the correct balance between the needs of the individual and the needs of society. And furthermore thinks that sometimes violence is necessary to reach the state of communism. This paper will reflect upon these two topics: the relationship of the individual and society, and the issue of violence, as each is portrayed in the manifesto.…

    • 4031 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    They took power from these people and finally the society is divided into two separate classes directly facing each other; bourgeois and proletarians. (The Communist Manifesto, p. 2) Now, according to Karl Marx, it's the time for the proletarians to take power from the bourgeois and create a new world order. In the document, Karl Marx also argued that in the process of doing their job in wiping out the feudal system, bourgeois created the system that will lead to their own collapse, which is full of exploitation and unequal distribution of wealth. (The Communist Manifesto, p. 4) Hence, like every time when there is a strong divide between classes in the society, it is the time for a revolution to occur. It is the necessary step for the society to progress further, and it can only be attained by "the forcibly overthrow of all existing conditions." (The Communist Manifesto, p.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Karl Marx and Adam Smith

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Adam Smith and Karl Marx have very different theoretical contributions. Adam Smith proposed that the free market, where producers are free to produce as much as they want and charge customers the prices they want, would result in the most efficient economic outcome for consumers and producers alike due to the. The rationale for his proposal was that each individual would try to maximize his own benefit. In doing so, consumers would only pay as much as or less than they would value the benefit that a good could provide, and producers would only sell for as much as or higher than they would have spent on producing a good. In his optimistic economy, there would be no surplus or demand; markets would always be in equilibrium, and the benefits to consumers and producers alike would be maximized. There would be a limited role for the government in such an economic system.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Karl Marx changed the world with his Communist Manifesto. He observed the gap between the rich and the poor and wanted the world to know that capitalism does not benefit everybody, and that it would not be permanent. Marx believed the proletariat will triumph over the bourgeoisie because the self-interest of the bourgeoisie exploits and alienates the proletariat to the point where they become class conscious and politicized, and they would revolutionize society. This revolution would lead to a very different stage in history where private property would not exist, which would lead to social classes not existing, ending the dialectical flow of history.…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution or the Cultural Revolution (1966 -1976) was one of the most dramatic and bleakest periods in the history of the People’s Republic of China. The roots of the Cultural Revolution date back to the late 1950s to the early 1960s when the Great Leap Forward ended in catastrophe. The leader, Mao Zedong lost a lot of his influence among his revolutionary comrades, supporters and eventually, he was removed from actual powers by the members of the party. During his eradication, Deng Xiaoping and Liu Shaoqi came to power. They introduced China to “economic reforms based on individual incentives where families are allowed to cultivate their own plots of land - as an attempt to revive the crippled economy. Mao detested such policies, believing that the CCP was becoming too bureaucratic and the Party officials shied away from the values of Communism and revolution.” (Spence, 1990)…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Great Proletariat Cultural Revolution[1] was a political and ideological struggle spanning the decade from 1966-1976. More implicitly, it was a struggle spurned into motion by Mao Zedong to reinstitute his mass line and turn China back to the ‘Socialist Road.’ Mao urged the Chinese to undergo a ‘class struggle’ whereby those truly on the path to Communism would rise against the new bureaucracy who were implementing ideology inconsistent with the main tenets of Maoism. However, what ensued was catastrophic and referred to by Feng Jicai as “Ten Years of Madness.”[2] While the class structure of post-revolutionary Chinese society had effectively eradicated the feudal class structure, a new, elite bureaucratic class had emerged. Indeed, these new elite and the remnants of the old bourgeois class bore the brunt of the violent onslaught of Mao’s Red Guards during the CR. In this essay, I argue that class struggle, and struggle under socialism in the CR was paradoxical as “most radicals in the revolutionary campaign against revisionism were representatives not of the proletariat…but of the bourgeoisie itself.”[3] While many joined Mao in is his crusade for utilitarian reasons, many also joined seeking to revenge ill-treatment and denigration at the hands of the elite due to their ‘bad class backgrounds.’ Furthermore, this period demonstrates through the factional plight of the Red Guards and the persecution of party cadres and intelligentsia, that class struggle is not always initiated from unprivileged or discontented classes, but also from those aspiring to retain their new elitist position in society.…

    • 3355 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics