Preview

Major Consequences Of Alexander's Death

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
428 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Major Consequences Of Alexander's Death
No one was prepared for Alexander’s death; a weak succession, following other complications, arose after his passing. His loyal Macedonian generals wanted to preserve the Macedonian Empire, so they appointed themselves governors of the various provinces in the empire. This led to one major consequence of Alexander’s death, which was the weak governmental succession that followed. The governors were very ambitious, strong-willed men who had conflicting views. These conflicting views led to warfare, which in turn led to the execution or murder of all direct members in the Macedonian royal house. Another major consequence was the unequal distribution of the prosperity of the Macedonian Empire. The urban Greeks, the Macedonians, and the Hellenized

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After Alexander’s death, unfortunately the powerful and mighty empire he built up, rapidly declined. But in these remains, were left people of various races and cultures. Even though Alexander’s premature death was devastating it set the groundwork for a new era that is now known as the Hellenistic Age. During the Hellenistic Age, Alexander was responsible for most of Eurasia’s cultural development and diffusion. There were many advancements made during this era, some regarding medicine, military, and math & mechanical sciences.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alexander maintained Dario’s provinces, called Sapras. He changed the rulers by his generals but since they did not have enough men of his own, the body of administration was formed by the Persians that were already there, maintaining the same structure and the same government system. Regarding the political orientation he tried to introduce some new aspects as necessity to maintain the conquered territories. He imposed the Greek language and favoured the mix marriage between conquered and conquerors to encourage the rapprochement between both people.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In general, the four great military men of the West are Alexander, Hannibal, Caesar, and Napoleon. Alexander was the earliest one, he became the king of the Macedonian Empire at the age of 20, a year later he started the expedition to the Persian Empire, he conquered the Persia, Egypt, and northern India before 33 years old, and then dead on the way back .His influence on Europe is very large, affecting many of the great men later.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phillip was later assassinated and many believe that Alexander played a role in his demise. Alexander finally became King of Macedonia and fixed his attention on Persia. The Persian empire have had control of a large sum of territory to the East of Greece and were arguably the most powerful empire on Earth at the time.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To be quite honest before this lesson I had always held the assumption that Alexander The Great was similar to that of Caesar; mainly in the sense that he was a general who gained power through conquest. Yet, to my surprise, I now know that Alexander was infact the son of a king, Phillip the second. Knowing this, I now view this discussion question a bit differently. There is no doubt that Alexander The Great was infact an influence character in history, but I wager his father deserves more credit than what common history gives him. The empire Alexander created both militarily and politically would, in my opinion, never occurred with the earlier conquest, and alliances his father set up. Simply put, the military and resources Alexander needed to begin his trek across the known world to the Greeks would have never happened without the alliances with the other powers Philip the second secured through political married and then latter conquest. Alexander very well could have amassed a military through the ways his father did, but the point is he did not have to do that in the beginning. Naturally, he would recruit new members to the military with ever conquest, but I believe saying this to answer a question on how Alexander created his empire’s army would be trival. However, the question itself is dually worded. The empire's military, as least for the beginning part of its creation would have been allotted to Alexander through what his father archived.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, the Persian Emperor Paries lll, was brightly intelligent and his army outnumbered Alexander’s. By surprise Alexander denied the offer from Emperor to surrender all the Persian Empire west of Euphrates, and proceeded to invade the rest of Persia. Alexander mind was set on one thing only; that was to conquer the entire empire, which was just what he did. Persian grew a massive love for Alexander once the made the attempt to merge the Greek and Persian cultures, but they we’re both holding important positions. By doing so this caused him a lot of hardship once he begins to rule the former Persian Empire. Even though he adopted the Persians ways of governing; while keeping the Greek cultural ways. Alexander looked to create a new-found life with the empire, but not to exclude, but those in Greece started to resent him while the was away in Persia. The attention that Alexander showed the Persians, made those in Greece feel jealous a d the citizens began to…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great was, in many ways, an amazing ruler. He was not afraid to take a chance on someone or something that everyone else had given up on, and he was prepared to risk his safety to help his men. Alexander also proved to his men that he was strong and that he was prepared to die for his cause.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page

    Many people think that Alexander the Great was truly great because of all his accomplishments, but not all of the things he did were great. He did lots of cruel things to people and animals just because he wanted to gain more power. Alexander has killed approximately 100,000 people only in four major battles (Alexander’s Legacy Doc E). Alexander was a prince who was born in macedonia of 356 BC. Alexander was very arrogant. He was taught by a philosopher Aristotle. He taught him subjects like, politics, sports, and warfare. Philip, Alexander’s father built the macedonian army into a deadly fighting machine, this sparked alexander’s interest and was eager to to lead the army. And Alexander got his chance to lead at the age of 20, because Philip…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The not so great part was married to 3 women, killing most of his men, and as a theory, killing his dad too. Those things didn’t matter a lot to them though. Alexander the Great died by a fever that was never cured in June, 323 B.C.E. He was allied with many cities and conquered many cities. He took some troops on the way. He got lots of supplies to continue his journey and weapons too. Shortly before he died he was supposedly asked to whom his empire should and their answer was said “to the strongest man.” His generals fought over his land and it ended up dividing up into multiple…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander ascended to the Macedonian throne. He soon showed his power when the large city of…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The effect Alexander left was positive because he developed an empire the Romans which would affect a large amount of the population if not built. He also set the role-model for future Leaders.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great came up with affective alternatives to help achieve his plan of winning the Battle of Gaugamela. Effective alternatives stimulate efficiency (Hultman, 2016). Alexander appeared to have more insight on how to make the most of his team. He knew that affective alternatives would be necessary to gain the victory because Darius of Persia had an advantage in the battle. Darius of Persia started the battle with a larger amount of soldiers, as well as, first choice of the battleground. Alexander the Great knew that Darius having this advantage would warrant him to consider all resources and strategies to gain the victory over the skirmish. Alexander organized a methodical game plan for his troops (Nassar, 2007). The writer feels…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At last, Alexander the Great was a standout amongst the most-known individuals in Greek history to have vanquished a ton of land. It helped him spread his way of life, however it restricted the choices of other urban communities' way of life. In this way, it was useful for Greece, awful for the Near East urban communities. On the off chance that Alexander didn't vanquish so much, significantly more things could have been distinctive and there could've perhaps been significantly more societies now. Alexander the Great was a progressive and he exclusively changed…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Persian empire at its peak has long been seen as one of the largest wholes during the classical era, and few have rivaled its size. The land that Alexander the Great was able to conquer, however, was one of the few that served as an appropriate challenge. Around the time of 338 B.C.E through 323 B.C.E., Alexander's collected mass was a whole. Of a Greek origin, Alexander was taught by Aristotle, the great philosopher, and it can be inferred that he used the strategic methods learned, among other things, to assist him during his expansion. It was short lived, however, when he died of an unknown cause at an early age of thirty-three. Even though his empire crumbled, his legacy lived on. Multiple cities, strongly influenced by Alexander, erected,…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. The death of Alexander the Great on June 11. 323 B.C. continues to confound and frustrate historians not simply because it happening long ago, but because of the controversial matters 3. Charles the Great, or Charlemagne, was a shining beacon of hope in an otherwise bleak and corrupt European during its seventh and eighth centuries because of his helping to reestablish a sound rthat could have contributed to his poisoning, such as the possible betrayal of his subordinates or jealous leaders who despised Alexander for his successful conquests of Greece, Egypt, Asia, and India.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays