Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Liberty of a person

Powerful Essays
1664 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Liberty of a person
Liberty of the person
1. No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liber save in accordance with law
2. Where complaint is made to a high court or any judge thereof that a person being unlawfully detained the court shall inquire into the complain and , unless satisfied that the detention is lawful , shall order him to be produced before the court and release him.
3. Where the person arrested shall be informed as soon as may be of the grounds of his arrest and shall be allowed to consult and be defended by a legal practitioner of his choice.
4. Where a person is arrested and not release he shall without unreasonable delay, and in any case within twenty-hours (excluding the time of any necessary journey) be produced before a magistrate and shall not be further detained in custody without the magistrate authority.

Provide that this Clause shall not apply to the arrest or detention of any person under the existing law relating to restricted residence, and all the provisions of this clause shall be deemed to have been an integral part of this article as from Merdeka Day: Provided further that in its application to a person , other than a citizen, who is arrested or detained under the law relating to immigration , this Clause shall be read as if there were substituted for the words “ without unreasonable delay, and in any case within 24hrs (excluding the time of any necessary journey)” the words “ within 14 days”

And provided further that in the case of an arrest for an offence which is triable by a Syariah court, references in this Clause to a magistrate shall be construed as including references to a judge of a Syariah court.

Slavery and forces labour prohibited

1. No person shall be held in slavery
2. All forms of forced labour are prohibited, but parliament may by law provide for compulsory service for national purposes.
3. Work or service required from any person as a consequence of a conviction or a finding or guild in a court of law shall not be taken to be forced labour within the meaning of this article, provided that such work or service is carried out under the supervision and control of public authority
4. Where by any written law the whole or any part of the functions of any public authority is to be carried on by another public authority for the purpose of enabling those functions to be performed the employees of the first mentioned public authority, and shall be bound to serve the second mentioned public authority and service with it and shall not be taken to be forced labour within the meaning of this article, and no such employee shall be entitled to demand any right from either the 1st mentioned or the 2nd mentioned public authority by reason of the transfer of his employment.

Protection against retrospective criminal laws and repeated trials

1. No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed.
2. A person who has been acquitted or convicted of an offence shall not be tried again for the same offence except where the conviction or acquittal has been quashed and a retrial ordered by a court superior to that by which was acquitted or convicted.

Equality

1. All person are equal before the law and entitled to the equal protection of the law.
2. Except as expressly authorized by this constitution there shall be no discrimination against citizens on the ground only of religion, race, descent, place of birth or gender in any law in the appointment to any office or employment under a public authority or in the administration of any law relating to the acquisition, holding or disposition of property or the establishing or carrying on of any trade, business, profession, vocation or employment.
3. There shall be no discrimination in favour of any person on the ground that he is a subject of the ruler of any state.
4. No public authority shall discriminate against any person on the ground that he is resident or carrying on business in any part of the Federation outside the jurisdiction of the authority
5. This article does not invalidate or prohibit
a. Any provision regulating personal law
b. Any provision or practice restricting office or employment connected with the affairs of any religion, or of an institution managed by a group professing any religion to persons professing that religion
c. Any provision for the protection, well-being or advancement of the aboriginal peoples of that Malay Peninsula (including the reservation of land) or the reservation to aborigines of a reasonable proportion of suitable positions in the public service.
d. Any provision prescribing residence in a State or part of a State as a qualification for election or appointment to any authority having jurisdiction only in that state or for voting in such an election.
e. Any provision of a Constitution of a State, being or corresponding to a provision in force immediately before Merdeka Day
f. Any provision restricting enlistment in the Malay Regiment to Malays\

Prohibition of banishment and freedom of movement

1. No citizen shall be banished or excluded from the Federation
2. Subject to Clause (3) and to any law relating to the security of the Federation or any part thereof, public order, public health, or the punishment of offenders, every citizen has the right to move freely throughout the Federation and reside in any part thereof
3. So long as under this constitution any other state is in a special position as compared with the States of Malaya, Parliament may be law impose restrictions, as between that state and other states on the right conferred by Clause (2) in respect of movement and residence.

Freedom of speech, assembly and association

1. Subject to Clauses (2),(3),and (4)
a. Every citizen has the right to freedom of speech and expression
b. All citizen have the right to assemble peaceably and without arms
c. All citizen have the right to form association
2. Parliament may by the law impose
a. On the right conferred by paragraph (a) of clause (1), such restriction as it deems necessary or expedient in the interest of the security of the Federation or any part thereof, friendly relations with other countries, public order or morality and restrictions design to protect the privileges of Parliament or any Legislative Assembly or to provide against contempt of court, defamation or incitement to any offence
b. On the right conferred by paragraph (b) of Clause (1) such restriction as it deems necessary or expedient in the interest of the security of the Federation or any part thereof or public order.
c. On the right conferred by paragraph (c) of Clause (1), such restriction as it deems necessary or expedient in the interest of the security of the Federation or any part thereof, public order or morality
3. Restriction on the right to form associations conferred by paragraph (c) of Clause (1) may also be imposed by any law relating to labour or education.
4. In imposing restrictions in the interest of the security of the federation or any part thereof or public order under Clause(2)(a), parliament may pass law prohibiting the questioning of any matter, right, status, position, privilege, sovereighty or prerogative established or protected by the provisions of Part III, article 152, 153 ,or 181 otherwise than in relation to the implementation thereof as may be specified in such law

Freedom of religion

1. Every person has the right to profess and practice his religion and subject clause (4) to propagate it
2. No person shall be compelled to pay any tax the proceeds of which are specially allocated in whole or in part for the purposes of a religion other than his own.
3. Every religious group has the right
a. To manage its own religious affairs
b. To establish and maintain institutions for religious or charitable purposes and
c. To acquire and own property and hold and administer it in accordance with law.
4. State law and in respect of the federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur , Labuan and Putrajaya , federal law may control or restrict the propagation of any religious doctrine or belief among persons professing the religion of Islam.
5. This article does not authorize any act contrary to any general law relating to public order, public health or morality.

Right in respect of education
1. Without prejudice to the generality of article 8, there shall be no discrimination against any citizen on the grounds only of religion, race, descent or place of birth.
a. In the administration of any educational institution maintained by a public authority and particularly the admission of pupils or students or the payment fees or
b. In providing out of the funds of a public authority financial aid for the maintenance or education of pupils or students in any educational institution ( whether or not maintained by a public authority and whether within or outside the Federation)
2. Every religious group has the right to establish and maintain institution for the education of children in its own religion, and there shall be no discrimination on ground only for religion ain any law relating to such institutions or in the administration of any such law but it shall be lawful for the federation or state to establish or maintain or assist in establishing or maintaining Islamic institutions or provide or assist in providing instruction in the religion of Islam and incur such expenditure as may be necessary for the purpose.
3. No person shall be required to receive instruction in or to take part in any ceremony or act of worship of a religion other than his own.
4. For the purpose of Clause (3) the religion of a person under the age of eighteen years shall be decide by his parent or guardian.

Rights to property

1. No person shall be deprived of property save in accordance with law.
2. No law shall provide for the compulsory acquisition or use of property without adequate compensation.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This section gives police the authority to pretty much arrest anyone for anything provided they abide by the above statements. Also if an offence has…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Provincial Offences act

    • 3379 Words
    • 14 Pages

    10. Bail, probation, or other court or administrative orders or agreements in effect, with contact person to confirm compliance, if necessary.…

    • 3379 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Court’s judgment in R. v. Morin (1992) 1 SCR 771, set out “administrative guidelines” regarding claims made involving section 11(b) of the Charter, and how to assess the reasonableness of institutional delay. Some of the factors that the Supreme Court considers in regards to whether a delay is reasonable or not includes reasons for the delay, length of the delay, prejudicial effect on the Appellant and any waiver of time periods. In R v. Morin, on behalf of the majority, Sopinka J. explained that depending on the presence or absence of prejudice, the administrative guidelines for institutional delay could be adjusted. Between committal and trial, an eight to ten months administrative guideline was establish by the Court for Provincial Court cases, and following a preliminary hearing a delay of an additional six to eight months is considered reasonable. In R. v. Jordan case, the judge found 32.5 months institutional delay and a two months total Crown delay. Of the 32.5 months institutional delay, overwhelmingly lack of resources caused 19 months of delay in Provincial Court. After examining the total amount of institutional/Crown delay, the judge concluded that this delay “substantially exceeded” the guidelines set out by Morin, but, on its own, it is not an unreasonable delay. The Appellant submitted an application for a stay of proceedings that was dismissed by the trial judge, because the judge concluded, the prejudice experienced by Jordan resulting from the delay was not substantial. According to the judge, the delays were institutional and the Appellant charges were more serious. Any meaningful prejudice experienced by Jordan was not significant. Also, because of a prior conviction, he was subject to a conditional sentence order; his bail condition did not have any significant impact on him and while on bail he was also able to find employment. Thus, the Appellant…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cypop 5 Task 1 Legislation

    • 4661 Words
    • 19 Pages

    * The Prohibition of Torture or Degrading Treatment- You should never be tortured or treated in an inhuman or degrading way, no matter what the situation.…

    • 4661 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is a 2000 word RBI on Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation) and Article 86 (Absence without leave)…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To enable persons to be diverted form the criminal justice system if found to have been of unsound mind at the time of committing an unlawful act or to be unfit for trial, and…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Last but not least, in our country, Article 5 of the Federal Constitution provides human rights to Liberty of the Person, however, some flaws in it should be reform or enforce by adopting the principle of constitutionalism (Mizan. N, 2014). In Article 5, no person shall be denied of his personal liberty (Federal Constitution, 2010), the person in this subsection is referring to everyone, not only citizens. Beside, this right is interpreted in the case of Aminah v Superintendent of Prison. There is no life deprivation and personal liberty as long as there is no arrest or detention. This shown that Malaysian law has become narrowness which they only refers to arrest and detention as a deprivation of liberty right (Mizan. N,2014). Moreover,…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Right To Baill

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages

    #4 –– Is everyone entitled to bail? Under what circumstances might one not be entitled to bail?…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The role of the custody officer was created by the Police and Criminal evidence act 1984 (PACE act). Throughout this essay I will be discussing the role of the custody officer and exploring the stages that must be undertaken when a person is detained and processed through custody post arrest. I will also discuss the various sections of the Human Rights Act 1998 that are affected when a person is detained, the limits of a persons detention, and the processes that must be undertaken if the custody officer wishes to extend the time that a person is kept in custody. I will be exploring the duties of the custody officer and what the job role entails on a day to day basis. Whatever is done by the custody officer is to be undertaken in a certain manor and in accordance with the PACE act, some of the processes being more time consuming than others. I will also look at limits of detention and the process of review where the custody officer must work alongside the review officer to determine whether the detainee should be held in custody for a longer period of time to gather further evidence.…

    • 2600 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Segregation DBQ

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    No form of authority or system should be able to infringe basic human rights, services, or…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Police Powers

    • 1900 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Bail means that after someone has been charged they are free from police custody until the next stage of the process of the case (trial). The custody officer has the power to either decide if bail is granted or not. If the officer refuses to grant bail they must present the case to magistrate court soon as possible.…

    • 1900 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Outcasts

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    "Nobody should be liable to discretionary capture, detainment or outcast" (Widespread Announcement of Human Rights, article…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dhffh

    • 708 Words
    • 2 Pages

    "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted."…

    • 708 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bail Essay

    • 723 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The decision to grant bail is made by a magistrate in a formal bail hearing held in the local court. Under certain circumstances police can grant bail. Bail is a crucial part of the criminal investigation process and any person charged with a criminal offence has the right to apply for bail. A magistrate hears a bail application in the local court and determines whether the person is a danger to society or not. If the magistrate believes there may be risks associated with granting a certain person bail they may impose conditions to mitigate these risks. Some common Bail conditions include the suspension of passports, routine police check ups, payment of surety’s and electronic monitoring.…

    • 723 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today, these measures are being effectively followed by police authorities of different states and union territories and persons in police lock-ups and custody are not being tortured to confess their crime and even they have certain rights which they can easily access to. Due to these guidelines certain amendments are made in different legislatures which have widened the scope of these very guidelines. These guidelines are effectively implemented by organs of government. The guidelines are often used by court in similar cases to provide justice to the needy and it is evident from cases including People's Union for Civil Liberties v. State of Maharashtra , Urmila Devi v. Yudhvir Singh , and many…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays