Preview

Legal Vocabulary Handout

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
453 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Legal Vocabulary Handout
Vocabulary * Plaintiff: party asking the court for relief (the one who brings the lawsuit) * Defendant: party against whom a lawsuit is brought (the one defending the lawsuit) * Appellant: party asking Court of Appeals for relief (the party bringing the appeal), always the party who lost at the district court level * Appellee: party responding to the appellant’s appeal, always the party who won at the district court level * Petitioner: party asking the Supreme Court for relief, always party who lost at appellate level * Respondent: party responding to petitioner’s request for relief * Amici Curiae: “Friends of the Court,” third parties that submit briefs in support of one side or another, often experts in some type of relevant field. Usually at the discretion of the court. * Intervenor: a third party with a direct interest in the outcome of the lawsuit may intervene, becoming a litigant himself, and also submit briefs and present argument. Often at the discretion of the court (although there are some situation where a third party has the right to intervene). * De novo: literally “from the beginning”; when an appellate court looks at an issue from the beginning, examining issues that the lower court has already decided. Often appellate courts are bound by the lower court’s findings of fact, but will examine the legal issues de novo * Holding: Court’s judgment, decision on question of law that is squarely before the Court, the answer to “question presented” * Dicta: everything outside of the holding * Majority opinion: presents the holding of the Court * Concurring opinion(s): agrees with the holding of the Court, but for different reasons * Dissenting opinion: disagrees with Court’s holding * Affirm: Court decides that the appellate court’s ruling was correct, and that ruling is upheld (petitioner loses on legal issues presented) * Sustain:

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Brief 11.2

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page

    The defendant (Smith) won in the lower courts, so the plaintiff (Cooper) appealed the case.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Retard

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The court: (1 mark) • • What is the name of the court? In which jurisdiction does this court operate?…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | The term used in law to denote the power of a particular court to hear a case and render a binding decision isAnswer…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appeal upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of assault on a police officer and criminal use of a firearm in the 2nd degree.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    An appellate court is a court of law that is empowered to hear an appeal of a court of first instance (trial court)…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    burden of proof

    • 11146 Words
    • 45 Pages

    decision as to who should bear the risk of losing the case. That allocation is decided…

    • 11146 Words
    • 45 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The appellant is not appealing the percentage of his estate which Ms Mncora was awarded and is also not appealing the delictual damages for breach of promises which was awarded. (para 3)…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Conard Murray

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages

    An appeal is a petition for review of a case that has been decided by a court of law. The petition is made to a higher court for the purpose of overturning the lower court's decision.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    TOPIC 1 Locus Standi

    • 8323 Words
    • 25 Pages

    1) In Society for the Protection of Unborn Children v Coogan [1989] IR 734 Finlay CJ referred to a litigant who is “an officious or meddlesome intervenient”. Walsh J. stated in “every member of the public has an interest in seeing that the fundamental law of the State is not defeated. The Constitution commits to the judicial organ of government the ultimate guardianship of the Constitution itself and of the vindication of the rights which are either guaranteed by it or conferred by it. But the courts cannot move until their powers are invoked.” (at 743).…

    • 8323 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    res judicata

    • 1262 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Res judicata literally means that the matter has already been decided and the meaning of a special plea of res judicata is that the matter or question raised by the other side has been finally adjudicated upon in proceedings between the parties and that it therefore cannot be raised again.1 There are requirements that should be satisfied for a special plea of res judicata to be granted which are; the dispute is between the same parties, for the same relief and on the same cause of action.2 These requirements are sometimes relaxed in circumstances warranting the relaxation of the requirements (issue estoppel). It is argued that a special plea to apply res judicata in the form of issue estoppel leads to unfairness such that it should be abolished from South African law, more is to be elucidated below.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Agency Scra: Case Digest

    • 6666 Words
    • 27 Pages

    Petitioner-appellant Vicente M. Domingo, now deceased and represented by his heirs, Antonina Raymundo vda. de Domingo, Ricardo, Cesar, Amelia, Vicente Jr., Salvacion, Irene and Joselito, all surnamed Domingo, sought the reversal of the majority decision dated, March 12, 1969 of the Special Division of Five of the Court of Appeals affirming the judgment of the trial court, which sentenced the said Vicente M. Domingo to pay Gregorio M. Domingo P2,307.50 and the intervenor Teofilo P. Purisima P2,607.50 with interest on both amounts from the date of the filing of the complaint, to pay Gregorio Domingo P1,000.00 as moral and exemplary damages and P500.00 as attorney's fees plus costs.…

    • 6666 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Facts: In Oct. 13, 1989, Tulfo wrote an article in his column in PDI 'On Target' stating that the Supreme Court rendered an idiotic decision in legalizing checkpoints, and again on Oct. 16, 1989, where he called the Supreme Court stupid and "sangkatutak na mga bobo justices of the Philippine Supreme Court". Tulfo was required to show cause why he should not be punished for contempt. Tulfo said that he was just reacting emotionally because he had been a victim of harassmen in the checkpoints, and "idiotic" meant illogical and unwise, and "bobo" was just quoted from other attorneys, and since the case had been decided and terminated, there was not contempts. Lastly, the article does not pose any clear and present danger to the Supreme court.…

    • 6415 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

    • 27024 Words
    • 109 Pages

    (2) "decree" means the formal expression of an adjudication which, so far as regards the Court…

    • 27024 Words
    • 109 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Appellate Division shall have Jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals from judgments, decrees, orders or sentences of the High Court Division. It has rule making power for regulating the practice and procedure of each division and of any Court subordinate to it.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Interveners: “Friend of the court” who are individual or organization that have a special interest in the proceedings and are allowed to promote their own views.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics