Preview

Laws of Criminal Evidence Q&a

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
471 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Laws of Criminal Evidence Q&a
1. Is the jury present when hearings on the admissibility of a confession are conducted? Cite the applicable rule that applies to this situation and explain the reason for the rule. No, the jury is not present for admissibility of confession hearings. Rule 104 (part C. conducting a hearing so the jury may not hear it) states “Hearing of jury. Hearing on the admissibility of confessions shall in all cases be conducted out of the hearing of the jury.” (Smith)
4. Define burden of proof, burden of going forward, and burden of persuasion.
Burden of proof: is the accuser’s job to prove beyond a reasonable doubt (in a criminal trial) or preponderance of the evidence (in Civil Matters) that a crime has been committed and that the accused did in fact commit said crime. (Ingram pg.47)
Burden of going forward: is the prosecution’s obligation to introduce prima facie evidence that will move toward meeting the burden of proof. (Ingram pg.47)
Burden of persuasion: simply means the burden of convincing the fact finder of the collective truth of evidence presented by prosecution or defense. (Ingram pg.48) 8. What is the difference between a presumption and an inference?
Presumption allows the jury in criminal cases to presume a second fact exists based on the proof of the first fact while inference allows the jury to conclude that a second fact is logical and can be reasonably drawn from another fact or group of facts. (Ingram pgs. 145-146) 9. What is a stipulation? Distinguish between a stipulation of testimony and a stipulation of fact. A stipulation is an agreement, admission, or concession made in judicial proceedings by the parties and
Hynes2
their attorneys concerning evidence of existing or nonexistent facts. (Ingram pg.186) stipulation of testimony is when the parties agree that if a certain person were present that they would swear under oath to the facts of the stipulation. (Ingram pg.186-187) stipulation of fact is where the



Cited: Ingram, Jefferson. Criminal Evidence. Amsterdam: Anderson Publishing, 2012. Smith, Lamar. evidence 2011. Dec. 01 2011. Aug. 21 2012 .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In criminal cases in the adversarial system of trial, justice is achieved through the use of evidence. In the adversarial system, the standard of evidence that can be used to support an argument is high. This is seen in the statement "… the rules of evidence are considerably more strict [than the inquisitorial system]."� This shows that the evidence that will be accepted is of reasonable quality and that it will less likely be made up. The burden of proof in criminal cases lies with the prosecution. The standard that guilt must be proven is beyond reasonable doubt. This is so that there is less chance of an innocent person being convicted. The statement, "No matter how strong the prosecution 's evidence may be, if the magistrate or the jury has any reasonable doubt that he or she is guilty, the accused is entitled to be acquitted"� proves that there should be no doubt when convicting a person. The standard of proof and evidence that the adversary system employs are among the…

    • 1021 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cross 9e TBB Ch07

    • 2373 Words
    • 13 Pages

    In a criminal case, the state must prove its case by a preponderance of the evidence.…

    • 2373 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Test Bank

    • 21854 Words
    • 88 Pages

    Actions brought under common law place most of the burden of proof on the defendant, usually auditors.…

    • 21854 Words
    • 88 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Casey Anthony case shows us how circumstantial is not enough to determine someone’s guilt. In the Casey Anthony case, each side used circumstantial evidence to prove that their story was accurate, and it gave them more room to use evidence as justification to their story. Not having any direct evidence did not give any facts for the judge and the jury to lean on. Not only is it important to have good quality and quantity of evidence (burden of production), but also it is important to use it persuasively (burden of persuasion). The burden of production cannot stand on itself to prove someone’s guilt, but neither can only being persuasive.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Courtroom Matrix

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    | Ensure that innocent persons are not unfairly charged and that the evidence against a suspect is sufficient to support a specific charge. The finding of guilt or innocence either by trial or plea negotiation, as well as in the post-trial phase, which includes sentencing, appeals, and parole.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Courtroom Matrix/ Cja491

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Responsibilities Ensures the trial follows legal procedures, interprets the law and finds resolutions (Michaels, 2013)…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | A grand jury’s finding that there is sufficient evidence to bring someone accused of a crime to trial…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Civil Action

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    a. A formal attestation or declaration of disapproval concerning a specific point of law or procedure during the course of trial.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evidence is a type of proof. It is usually used to prove someone innocent or guilty. There are many different types of evidence, such as: testimony, direct, circumstantial, and physical evidence. However, according to the article “Forensic: Evidence, Clues, and Investigation” by Andrea Campbell, forensic evidence is the best evidence to present at a court case or trial.…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ciara harris

    • 592 Words
    • 2 Pages

    6. What is the legal standard used to determine if the party you identified in Question Five has met the burden of proof? (10 pts.)…

    • 592 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    each side in a criminal or civil case will present evidence to support their position…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Definition of Evidence

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Burden of Proof can be defined as the duty of proving facts disputed on the trial of a case by the proper weight of evidence. In other…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Criminal Evidence

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Evidence is the key element in determining the guilt or innocence of those accused of crimes against society in a criminal court of law. Evidence can come in the form of weapons, documents, pictures, tape recordings and DNA. According to the American Heritage College dictionary, evidence is the documentary or oral statements and the material objects admissible as testimony in a court of law (476). It is shown in court as an item of proof, to impeach or rehabilitate a witness, and to determine a sentence. This paper will examine two murder cases, O.J. Simpson and Daniel Taylor.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HSC Legal Studies

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For the prosecution to obtain a conviction, they must prove the existence of all elements of a crime to the requisite criminal standard of proof, being beyond a reasonable doubt.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Innocent until proven guilty”, one of the most well-known quotes heard in media coverage on some of the highest profiled cases trial in the United State Courts System. Acquiring the comfort to know that everyone is assumed innocent until evidence proves otherwise can only be done knowing that all evidence would be collected to the fullest of the law and in the best upheld standers of the court system. The integrity of the evidence is what balance’s out the outcome of all criminal cases and the integrity of the first responder as well as that of the police department. If anything everyone present at a crime scene is responsible during the collected evidences. From the moment it was discover until the scene is cleared. Identifying evidence has it challenges because evidence can be everything within the proximity of a crime scene or many miles or continents away. Distance and jurisdiction alone is difficult to uphold and control. Properly identifying, collecting, and processing the evidence is what makes a…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays