Preview

HSC Legal Studies

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
315 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
HSC Legal Studies
HSC Legal Studies Yasmin Bradbury

Meaning of crime 1.1

A crime is an act or omission, harmful to the public that is punished by the state in criminal proceedings, initiated and pursued by the state.

The Elements of crime: Actus Reus, Mens Rea 1.2

For the prosecution to obtain a conviction, they must prove the existence of all elements of a crime to the requisite criminal standard of proof, being beyond a reasonable doubt.

With the exception of strict liability offences for a criminal offence to have occurred, the accused must have committed both elements of the crime:
Actus reus: refers to the actions (or in rare cases the failure to act/the omission) of the accused; that is that the accused actually did the act
Mens rea: refers to the mental state of the accused; i.e. that the accused intended the actions.

Strict Liability Offences 1.3

Strict liability offences are minor in nature e.g. speeding. For these the prosecution to prove mens rea; of the act alone is sufficient to constitute a crime.

Strict liability offences can only be successfully defended if the accused can prove that that the actual act did not occur as mens rea is irrelevant to this category of offences.

Causation 1.4

Causation is to prove a criminal charge; the prosecution must show that there is a link between the act and the crime. That is, that it is an act by which an effect is produced. For example, if someone was stabbed and they died on the on the operating table, then this act of the stabbing that caused the person to die, rather than the fault of the doctor. This link is called causation.

Case Blaue v R 1975 1 WLF 1411.
Appellant stabbed Victim and Victim later died for refusing medical treatment for religious reasons. Appellant argued that because Victim refused life saving medical treatment, his conviction for manslaughter should be overturned.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cross 9e TBB Ch07

    • 2373 Words
    • 13 Pages

    In a criminal case, the state must prove its case by a preponderance of the evidence.…

    • 2373 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Regina Knight Case

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Mens rea refers to ‘guilty mind’ and is defined as the state of mind requiring constituting a particular crime which is the mental element of an offence. It is clear that the murder was pre-meditated. Her mens rea is shown more clearly by the comments made by the prisoner to other persons indicating intention, comments made by Mr. price to others which indicated his fears for his life, comments of a similar kind made by the prisoner to Mr Price in the presence of others and the conduct of the prisoner in the days leading up to the murder. She threatened Mr. Price and said “You’ll never get me out of this house. I am going to kill pricey and I am going to get away with it, I’ll get away with it cause I’ll make out, I’m mad. The causation of the incidence was clear. She wanted to kill him and she performed actus reus and his life ended on her hands.…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Causation refers to whether the defendant's conduct caused the harm or damage in a crime and it must be established in all result crimes. Causation in criminal liability is divided into factual causation and legal causation. Factual causation is the starting point and consists of applying the 'but for' test. In most cases, factual causation alone will be enough to establish causation. However, in some circumstances it will also be necessary to consider legal causation. Legal causation is when the result must be caused by a culpable act, the act of the defendant may not necessarily need to be the only cause, but must be more than minimal. Factual causation is established by applying the 'but for' test. This asks, 'but for the actions of the defendant, would the result have occurred?' If the answer is yes, the result would have occurred in any circumstance and the defendant is not liable. If no the defendant is liable as it can be said that their action was a factual cause of the result.…

    • 1719 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Besides showing that the person committed the unlawful act (Actus reus), a mental component must too be satisfied. The mental component is referred to as the mens rea, meaning “intention to do wrong”. This intention must be established for most findings of criminal responsibility. The importance of mens rea is obvious. If an accused person is suffering from a mental disorder which deprives them of reason and understanding, the mens rea necessary for criminal responsibility may be…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr Guzha

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Actus reus is the physical element of a crime .It can be the physical element of a crime. It can be an act or a failure to act (an omission) or a state of affairs. In most cases the actus reus will be something the defendant does, but there are situations in which failure to act is sufficient for the actus reus. These are set out at section 2.2 ‘ state of affairs’ cases are very rare.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The expansion of criminal responsibility has broadened the scope of liability and defences applicable in relation to Offences Against the Person.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The textbook established the ideas of mens rea which is a guilty mind and actus reas which is a guilty act,and that it takes the both of them as components of crime and (Sterling,1999) states around what time this originated in english common law and how long it was faithfully used even up into modern American law. He also states how the American Jurisprudence has slowly been moving away from requiring those two components of crime. The reasons being that efforts were made to make the criminal justice system more uniform and predictable, to marginalize the element of…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Law

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An interesting case that was currently brought before the Supreme Court was Missouri vs. Frye. I found this case interesting due to the injustice that was provided by Frye’s counsel, and that Frye insisted on committing the same crime over and over again even though he knew he had an open case concerning driving under a suspended license. There were many sources and jurisdictions related to criminal law that also relates to this case. Criminal liability is when one takes responsibility for committing a crime, and accomplice liability is when someone helps someone commit a crime. Actus reus means guilty act, mens rea means guilty mind, and concurrence means the equality of rights. Actus reus and mens rea are both necessary in order for a defendant to prove criminal liability.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Liability

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The actus reus of this offence is any act which causes the victim (v) to apprehend an immediate infliction of unlawful violence (iiuv). No force need actually be applied, creating a fear is sufficient, as was illustrated by Logdon and Lamb. The v must fear that violence threatened is immediate, in Smith this was held to mean as part of the current activity, when the v was separated from the defendant (d) by a glass window.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ii. And result crimes (series of events) – a forbidden consequence results from the physical conduct (eg. A death). Usually you have to prove Mens Rea for all parts of the series of events (eg. Murder – intention to do the act and intention to cause death)…

    • 991 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Define how concurrence works with actus reus and mens rea to lead to criminal liability. Why is…

    • 429 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sef Gonzales Report

    • 1891 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In order for a crime to occur, both elements of the crime, Actus Reus and mens rea must be present. Actus Reus and mens rea are legal terms used to define a crime. Both elements must be present for an accused to be found guilty of a crime (except for strict liability). Mens rea means that the person must have had a guilty mind at the time of committing the crime- that is they must have intended to commit the crime.…

    • 1891 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    act or acts commanded or enjoined by the law. It is usually inferred from the…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Is the actual act that the person is accused of to be convicted the evidence must support the accusation that the person committed the crime…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Murder Manslaughter Facts

    • 2291 Words
    • 10 Pages

    i. Cause: it is important that the action of the defendant is the cause of the victim’s death. It is easy to establish this fact in straight forward cases were the defendant directly stabs, shoots or poisons the victim and they die immediately. However if in the course of the defendants act the intended victim takes avoiding action or someone else intervenes or the victim has characteristics that leave them prone to injury or death, the result may be what is known as a break in the chain of causation.…

    • 2291 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics