Preview

The Regina Knight Case

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1974 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Regina Knight Case
The legal citation of the case.
Regina v [2001] NSWSC 1011 (8 november 2001)

The elements of the offence.
In order for a trial to be brought, the police and prosecutors might be able to prove that the elements of the particular offence are present. In this criminal case both Actus reus, Mens rea as well causation was clearly shown through the behavior of Katherine Knight.
Actus reus is the term referring to ‘guilty act’ meaning any voluntary actions of omissions that constitutes to a crime, it is the physical element of an offence Her Actus reus is shown through her act of stabbing him 37 times and killing him. She also chopped off his head and cooked it with vegetables and skinned majority of his body. It is certain to say her act was intentional, malicious and evil.
Mens rea refers to ‘guilty mind’ and is defined as the state of mind requiring constituting a particular crime which is the mental element of an offence. It is clear that the murder was pre-meditated. Her mens rea is shown more clearly by the comments made by the prisoner to other persons indicating intention, comments made by Mr. price to others which indicated his fears for his life, comments of a similar kind made by the prisoner to Mr Price in the presence of others and the conduct of the prisoner in the days leading up to the murder. She threatened Mr. Price and said “You’ll never get me out of this house. I am going to kill pricey and I am going to get away with it, I’ll get away with it cause I’ll make out, I’m mad. The causation of the incidence was clear. She wanted to kill him and she performed actus reus and his life ended on her hands.

Factors that might have led to the criminal behavior.

There are a few factors that may account to the behavior of Knight. It includes psychological factors, social factors, and self interest.

Knight is said to have been diagnosed with the borderline personality disorder and to have suffered from a post traumatic stress disorder. Her



Bibliography: Case: Regina v  Knight  [2001] NSWCS 1011 (8 November 2001) Last updated: 29 January Decision: Imprisonment for life. Case:  Knight V R [2006] NSWCCA 292 (11 September 2006)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Archer’s inconsequential remark became twisted with her own ideas, ideas that stemmed from an unstable mind. On Hell Night, Mr. Archer told her to put the fraternity flag above the door. However, Ms. Milan Jackson saw this as the ideal moment to perform the perfect stunt. Her drunken, mentally broken, perfection seeking, and emotionally unstable self took an action that although was ill advised, was an action taken all on her own. Mr. Archer does not deserve to be second guessed as a murderer in this horrid ordeal. If you strip away the high emotions of the accused, and if you strip away the poorly drawn interpretations and implications put forth by the State, all that will remain are the facts. The entirety of the prosecution's guess of a motive is built around an insignificant remark coming from Chris Archer, saying that he believes Ms. Jackson to be overconfident and disloyal to Pat. If justice may be served, you the jury must see that there is no evidence brought forth that Mr. Chris Archer has any motive whatsoever significant enough for him to take Milan Jackson’s innocent life. Moreover, no intention to kill, voluntarily or involuntarily, can be confidently determined beyond a reasonable…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Therefore, it is the job of the prosecution to then establish whether she also has the mens rea for her Victims’ murder. The mens rea for murder is the intention to kill or cause grievous bodily harm. There are two types of intention: direct intention and oblique intention. Direct intention as defined by James LJ in Mohan6 is the “decision” to bring about a “particular consequence” no matter whether the Defendant “desired that consequence or not”. In the words of R.A. Duff7 direct intent can be construed from the Defendant’s actions if the Defendant would consider himself a “failure” if the “relevant consequence” did not occur. Lydia stated that she had no “malice” whatsoever to Danielle or Gemma and only intended to scare Jasmine. By applying Mohan8 it is clear that Lydia did not make the decision to throw the law reports in order to kill Danielle and would not consider herself to have failed if her actions did not cause the death of Danielle. Therefore, Lydia did not display direct intent to kill Danielle and whether or not Lydia displayed oblique intent must be explored. The cases of R v Maloney9 and Hancock and Shankland10 provided some confusion on what degree of foresight was required for a jury to infer intention from a Defendant’s actions. In Nedrick11 it was established that the jury should ask how “probable” the consequences from the Defendant’s voluntary act were and if…

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    (as shown in the book) Figure 2–1 illustrates the relationship between mens rea and actus reus. Criminality exists when the two concur and where no defense, as characterized in the figure, exists. Defenses in this figure refer to the zone of individual liberties over which governments have no authority to regulate and to those instances where other factual or legal defenses free an individual from criminal responsibility. Hence, as discussed in this chapter, the essence of criminal conduct consists of a concurrence of a criminal act with a culpable mental state.” In the case of the shooting of Mayor Crespo, wife Lyvette ‘actus reus’ or the criminal act is the shooting of her husband. ‘Mens rea’ is the wife’s culpable (or responsible) mental state during the incident. A concurrence of the two – actus reus and mens rea is clearly observed in the shooting, and this clearly constitutes as crime. Whatever outcome this may have in the coming days or weeks, I will be one of many spectators who wait for the full story and final decision. One thing is clear; a crime was obviously committed at the night of the…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    HSC PREP

    • 5612 Words
    • 23 Pages

    Actus Reus: A Latin term, which means the guilty act. Actus Reus means that there must be an action or physical movement.…

    • 5612 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    At a 1920s detective convention everything went awry when 62 year old Clarence Knightley, the owner of the Knightley hotel, was found dead at the bottom of an elevator shaft. When the body was found it was realized that not only did he get pushed down the elevator but he also had a magnifying glass stuck in his throat. The victim was also discovered to have ink all over his fingers for an unknown reason.…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    i.i Sawyer and Sayid The legal definition on murder is “The unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another” In order for Sawyer to be convicted of Sayid’s murder it needs to be establish that the actus reus (guilty act) was present while the mens rea (guilty mind) and Sayid’s death was a result Sawyer unlawful act. The actus reus of murder is unlawful act which results in death of another human being within the queen’s peace. The mens rea of murder is intention also known as malice aforethought there are two types of intention.…

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Prosecuting Arguments

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages

    For the charge of homicide, all of the required elements are present in the facts of the case. The journal entries discussing the purchase of rope, rags, and a sharp hunting knife "to fulfill [his] destiny" prove mens rea. Actus reus is proven in the evidence that the victim was found with cloth stuffed in her mouth, arms and legs tied with rope restraints, and…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Actus Reus: did the victim actually consent and in what circumstances will it be accepted/rejected…

    • 2265 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In any criminal case the prosecution has the burden of proof in proving beyond reasonable doubt, the defendant/s (D) should have both the actus reus (AR) and mens rea (MR) elements of the crime. The definition of murder is the unlawful killing of another person in the Queens peace with the intention to cause death or GBH. To determine whether…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The act is the defining what the person actually did to cause the homicide, such as deliberately fire a gun, or setting a bomb. This would also be the same for the person who is intoxicated and is involved in a physical confrontation, resulting in death. Even though they had no intention of killing, their actions impaired their judgment.…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Normally, an objective view of mens rea, where the defendant fails to recognise the risk of his acts where a reasonable person would have done so, (recklessness in the Caldwell sense) cannot be said to constitute intention. Rather, a subjective, purposive view of intent encompasses the intention to act or to cause a consequence, or foresight or awareness of a risk of acting or causing the consequence (Cunningham [1957]). For the majority of offences, recklessness will suffice for a conviction, but some do require proof of an intent, including murder (an intent to kill or inflict grievous bodily harm), theft, burglary, and wounding with intent. For the distinction between…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Determine whether or not a conviction is feasible when an alleged perpetrator does not have the required mens rea but has engaged in the actus rea. Provide a rationale to support your position.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    mala in se, which includes acts, such as murder, so offensive to morals as to be…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    IN YOUR FACE

    • 2753 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Sion Soleimany (hereinafter referred to as the father) and his son, Abner Soleimany (refers as the son) were engaged in the export of Persian carpets from Iran. Between 1980 and 1983, the son arranged for the export of the carpets from Iran in contravention of Iranian Revenue laws and export controls. The carpets were sold by the father in England or elsewhere outside Iran.…

    • 2753 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Criminal Law Study Notes

    • 6111 Words
    • 25 Pages

    Actus reus: ‘guilty act’ - action, external element or the objective element of a crime…

    • 6111 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Powerful Essays