Preview

Karl Marx Vs Adam Smith Research Paper

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
500 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Karl Marx Vs Adam Smith Research Paper
Position paper – Who is most satisfied with canadas mixed economy – Adam Smith or Karl Marx?
Adam smith would be more satisfied and happier with Canada’s mixed economy today than karl marx.
Adam Smith and Karl Marx are the greatest economic analysts the world has ever seen. Adam Smith is considered as the father of modern day economics whereas Karl Marx is considered as the the father of Communism. Adam Smith has taken a Western approach in his thought processing on economics. Adam Smith had stated that the workers always look for the best jobs and the best wages. On the hand, Karl Marx was against such a theory. In his opinion, a labour- wage war will break down the society and lead to the downfall of the economic composition. Adam Smith believed in the liberty of all
…show more content…
On the contrary, Karl Marx was a critic of capitalism and believed in individual freedom. Karl Marx believed that Socialism would replace capitalism. Adam Smith was also an advocate of free market whereas Karl Marx thought this would make the rich more rich and the poor poorer. Adam Smith was of the opinion that each person has the right to pursue happiness and he has to take that in his own hands to advance within the society. Karl Marx does not agree with this principle. In his opinion, when a person betters himself, he is not improving but endangering the society. Adam Smith has published his ideologies in his book, “Wealth of Nations”, which was published in 1776. Adam Smith has discussed in detail the principles of Capitalism in this book. The basic idea of Communism put forth by Karl Marx came to the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    What was the general message set forth in Professor Adam Smith's book, The Wealth of Nations? How would his ideas impact on government?…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Adam Smith is regarded as the father of capitalism due to his work in political economics, specifically production,…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adam Smith, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels were three of the most profound economic philosophers in history. They lived in the midst of a society that was incredibly capitalistic. In 1776 Scotland, Adam Smith published the book, The Wealth of Nations. It was his take on how the capitalist society was something that could flourish over time if it were to operate in a highly functioning manner. Merely 72 years later in 1848, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, both of German decent, published a pamphlet entitled The Communist Manifesto.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Andrew Carnegie was the epitome of the “self-made man.” Karl Marx has been dubbed “the father of communism.” Carnegie was a capitalist at heart, while Marx strongly believed in socialist and communist ideals. These men are clashing opposites, yet both men share several points in common. But when it comes to Carnegie’s and Marx’s stances on distribution of wealth and role of government in the economy, their views are on both ends of the spectrum. I believe Carnegie’s and Marx’s economic and social circles influenced their theories.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    adam smith

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Smiths baptism was on June 16, 1723 in Scotland. Smith attended the University of Glasgow at age 14, later on transferring to Balliol College in Oxford, England. He also spent time tutoring and teaching. Smith is culpable for promoting many of the ideas that built the school of thought that became known as Classical Economics. Laissez Faire philosophies like reducing the role of government intervention and taxation in the free markets and the idea that an invisible hand models supply and demand are key concepts Smiths writing is responsible for advocating. Adam Smith believed if the customer was satisfied and their needs were meet if would be good for both parties. This type of system would be beneficial for a country as a whole because the producer would continue to earn profits and the customers would keep coming back because they are satisfied. This is good for a country because it keeps it thriving.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Macro Review Test

    • 2824 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Smith and Jones are most likely both classical economists with a few minor differences of opinion.…

    • 2824 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They were both known for their distinct theoretical contributions. Adam Smith proposed that there should be a free market where the producers are free to produce as much as they want and charge buyers the prices that they want. He thought that this would result in the most efficient and desirable economic outcome for consumers and producers. This meant that the consumers would only pay as much or less than they would value the benefit from the good, and the producer would only sell for as much as or higher than they would have spent on making the product. The market would always be equilibrium. There would only be a limited role for the government in the economic system. Karl Marx disagreed and thought that workers would have an advantage because they are already rich and there would be a disadvantage to the poor. The rich would only get richer and the poor would only get poorer. He came out with a theory called the labor theory of value. The claims that the value of a good or service is directly connected to the amount of labor required for its production. Marx thought that the two classes in society, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, will remain stuck in their respective classes because of the very nature of capitalism. The wealthy bourgeoisie owns the factories and also dominates the media, universities, government, bureaucracy, and hence. Their position on the social status is unchangeable. The poor proletariat are only able to work hard. Marx thought that to fix this problem; the poor would have to revolt and create a new social order where there would be no distinction between segments of society. Adam Smith thought that capitalism was the most ideal economic system. Adam also opposed the idea of revolution to restore justice for the masses because he valued order and stability over relief and oppression. Marx thought that capitalism would lead to instability and injustice in a society. Marx…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Heilbroner Global Trends

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Smith, in terms of an indispensable source of strength for a private economy, not as a wasteful drag…

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many factories out there will benefit the employees and not taking advantage of them. Marx, on the other hand, thinks differently because employees are working so hard, but the wages are not high enough and it is unfairly paid. Karl Marx, Andrew Ure, and Adam Smith have all different views of the society, however Marx is more convincing because his idea make more sense to many people in the society. There are good and bad things happen in history and that is the life of the people in this world.…

    • 1770 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    West, E (1990) Adam Smith 's Revolution, Past and Present. Adam Smith 's Legacy: His…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is undeniable that Karl Marx and Adam Smith had different opinions regarding what capitalism is all about. Adam Smith in the Wealth of Nations suggested that the free market where the people and their businesses have the liberty to create products as many as they can and impose prices depending on how high or low they want them to be would lead to the best and most attractive economic result for the people and the producers because of the “Invisible Hand.” Ion the other hand, Karl Marx in Capital said that the employees would be taken advantage of by the capitalists or businessmen because capitalism offers a huge benefit to the wealthy and is detrimental to the impoverished people. The wealthy people will get wealthier while the poor people will get more impoverished. Nonetheless, in spite of these differences in opinions in can be said…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx is regarded by many as the first social scientist ever. Although it is argued that Adam Smith was the first great economist, and David Ricardo the first great modern economist, Marx is undoubtedly the economist that has had the biggest impact on economic history. It was he that masterminded the concept of a socialist utopia, which ultimately led to over a third of the world been ruled under the communist regime , a model that Marx concocted. Born on 5 May 1818, in Trier, one of Germany's oldest cities, Marx was the first economist who infused history, philosophy, economics, sociology and political theory all into his work. Marx was ahead of his time, his theories were ground breaking, only time would tell whether his predictions would come to fruition. Marx's main claim was that capitalism would eventually fall due to its own internal contradictions and faults, to be replaced by a socialist utopia, so to speak. Marx had many complex motives behind the eventual fall of capitalism, he delves in to great detail about these reasons in his masterpiece Capital (1867), in this text Marx writes about how the capitalist system will falter over time due to the way it operates. It is these faults of the capitalist system that are brought in to question when analysing an issue of this nature, what weaknesses did Marx identify in his writings and were these weaknesses evident in the capitalist system come the end of the twentieth century?…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Classical economic thoughts originated in the 1770s by its leading economists: Adam Smith and David Ricardo. David Ricardo divided the participants in the economy into three classes with profit being the income received by one of the classes (i.e. the capitalists), with the other two classes being landowners and workers who receive rent and wages, respectively. Profit is then differentiated from the other two incomes as a bonus for entrepreneurs – it is a surplus of the total income in the economy after wages and rent have been paid. Adam Smith (1776) espouses the view that the employer “shares” in the value added to the materials from which produce is made through the labour of workers and that “in this share consists his profit”.…

    • 2081 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    History

    • 2331 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Adam Smith and Eighteen-Century Economic Globalization: Free Market Principles Are Still Topical in the Twenty-First Century…

    • 2331 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Money, Not Enough…

    • 7892 Words
    • 32 Pages

    In the 17th and 18th centuries, following the Renaissance and the era of mercantilism, what became known as capitalism was documented and commented on by three noted economist/philosophers, Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), John Locke (1632-1704), and Adam Smith (1723-1790). Each man took the theory of capitalism one step further than the man before him. Hobbes was about power, Locke about private property, and Smith expounded…

    • 7892 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Powerful Essays