Preview

Karl Marx and Andrew Carnegie concerning their ideologies on class tensions.

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1802 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Karl Marx and Andrew Carnegie concerning their ideologies on class tensions.
Throughout history competition has created bitter tension between social classes. Competition has occurred in every social structure that has existed to this day. Social structure has been the determining factor of competition: in essence the poorer classes have always tried to compete with the wealthier classes to seize their wealth and power; the greater the economical gap between the two opposing classes the fiercer the competition between them. Two highly esteemed and different people, Karl Marx and Andrew Carnegie, developed their own ideologies to resolve and ease class tension, that is, whether changes should be imposed on the structure and role of social classes. Another writer, Sam Keen illustrates the effect of competition in the extreme. Within their opposing and controversial views, there lies the more efficient social-economic resolution: a modified version of Carnegie's argument, despite the fact that it has some imperfections. The answer is determined by the acknowledgment by the powerful and the wealthy of certain responsibilities to the poorer classes. Each author feels that the competition within a capitalist society has definite effects on social structure but disagree as to what this effect is.

Competition exists in many forms and in our case it exists in the form of class struggles. The upper class, known as the bourgeois, possess wealth and power over the lower class, known as the proletariats, that consists of the working class in society. The battles between these two classes have ranged from verbal fighting to stages of bedlam and bloodshed. Financial stability allows the wealthy to fulfill their desires and needs by exploiting the working class to a great degree. In response, the working class engages in competing with the wealthy to overcome their control and establish itself as the ruling class. Unfortunately, relatively few people in the poor class ever achieve this goal, thereby showing the level of difficulty of overcoming a higher

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Andrew Carnegie was the epitome of the “self-made man.” Karl Marx has been dubbed “the father of communism.” Carnegie was a capitalist at heart, while Marx strongly believed in socialist and communist ideals. These men are clashing opposites, yet both men share several points in common. But when it comes to Carnegie’s and Marx’s stances on distribution of wealth and role of government in the economy, their views are on both ends of the spectrum. I believe Carnegie’s and Marx’s economic and social circles influenced their theories.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Flsa Analysis

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In order to improve their living conditions, the proletariat of the capitalist countries fought a long battle against the…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are the rich and there are the ones who are not rich: the ones who are in control, and the ones who are subjugated. According to Karl Marx, the “history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.” The clashes and conflicts between these people have shaped all of history.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Next we will take a look into the Conflict theory. After witnessing the Industrial revolution, and how peasants left the city to work and were still barely making enough money to eat, Karl Marx, the…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main actors with Conflict theory is the “capitalist class” (for some, known as the elite). The elite class includes individuals and/or groups that are seen as figures/symbols of fortune and power; in addition, these people own the means of production or own the forms of accessing it. The second group involved in this system is the working class (also known as the lower classes), which involves the powerless individuals that have no choice but to sell their labor to the higher class in order to make a living and survive in the real world. I like to see this system as the boss and the ones that work for the boss. The elite are able to maintain power over the working class because the higher class is seen as having more power than the…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx wrote in 1848, "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles"; it still holds true today. Feudal society gave way to democracy, yet the class stratification only intensified. As Marx states "Society as a whole is more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps…the Bourgeoisie and Proletariat," or in today's terminology, the have and have-nots. The growing middle and lower classes in America cannot compete with the "old wealth" of the upper class. Some entrepreneurs, who were in the right place at the right time, have managed to climb the social ladder and enter the bourgeoisie. An individual born today is more likely to move down the ladder rather than up. Marx addressed that possibility by stating, "What the bourgeoisie therefore produces, above all, are its own grave diggers." The bourgeoisie gain strength through political advances at the expense of the proletariat.…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    While the two classes have different goals, it is the perpetual conflict between these classes that allows the upper class to satisfy their ambitions and the lower class’ desire to avoid…

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Frued vs Marx

    • 2180 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Marx believes that man is naturally good, but the ownership of property has brought about aggression and selfishness. In other words, over time private property and money have corrupted man. Marx points out that throughout history, classes have existed, but were based on "feudal, patriarchal, and idyllic relations." Tradition and family relations determine a person's class. In the capitalistic society, however, only the ownership of property, the "naked self-interest… cash payment," determines one's class. Marx describes the continuous conflict as an ongoing trend of class struggles. When many take a look at society they notice that with in classes there's always the oppressors and oppressed in continuous hostility towards each other. However, when this phenomenon ends it is normally a rebellious way.…

    • 2180 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx and the Bourgeoisie

    • 1910 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In this essay I plan to analyze the claim by Karl Marx that the bourgeoisie class produces its own "gravediggers". I will first present a definition of the bourgeoisie and the proletariat classes along with what Marx means by his claim. After discussing Marx's claim and his support I will assert that his claim is false and was based on a false assumption. I will argue that Marx does not allow the possibility of an adaptation on behalf of the bourgeoisie. Furthermore, that Marx contradicts his claim with his own ideologies from his critique of capitalism. Finally, Marx adopts historical determinism to support his view which has proven to be flawed. The claim that the bourgeoisie produces its own gravediggers is based on circumstantial evidence and is therefore false.…

    • 1910 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    As one of the major systems of stratification, class is based on ownership of resources and on the type of work that people do. Marx and Webber acknowledged social class as a determinant of social inequality and social change. For Marx, people’s wealth determines their class position. The stratification of society into different social groups results in disparity in income and wealth and uneven access to available goods and services. People with high income or wealth have more opportunity to control their own lives. People with less income have fewer life chances and must spend their restricted resources to obtain basic living requirements.…

    • 1699 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his study, Marx begins his argument describing a class’ struggles, or equally, the exploitation of one class by another, meaning the instance of one class becoming too powerful in comparison to the rest of society, is the driven force in which all historical developments are based upon. With this, Marx proposes the example of the Proletariat vs. the Bourgeoisie, the working class vs. the materialistic…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is the role of class consciousness in Marx’s thoughts and does the concept contain any present day relevance?…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capitalism is defined as “an economic system in which the ownership of the means of production- like land, factories, large sums of money, and machines - is in private hands” (SOC 10). Social Philosopher Karl Marx strongly believed that in the end, capitalism simply wouldn’t work for several different reasons. His idea became known as Marxian conflict theory. While the functionalist theory examines groups’ order and cohesion, the conflict theory examines ways groups disagree and struggle for power. Marx predicted that capitalism would cause continuous tension between the haves and the have -not’s; the have-not’s mostly being the minorities and the poor. He believed that capitalist societies would be reduced to two social classes; the capitalist class (the bourgeoisie or the rich) and the working class (the proletariat or the poor), and that this division would eventually cause some sort of social upheaval.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Social Conflict Theory

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The social conflict paradigm is a theory based on society being a complex system characterized by inequality and conflict that generate social change. Personal life experiences dictate me to believe this theory is true. Discussion of the theory in question and how it pertains to myself will be covered in the paper. Social conflict can be seen all over the world we live in: in sports, politics and normal social engagements. The main point I have experienced with this theory would be the fact that I don't come from a rich, powerful, and prestigious family, which in turn limits my chances of being successful. Karl Marx studied social conflict His entire life and wanted to reduce social inequality. Wheatley-2 The social conflict theory can be described as favoritism. Society tends to show favoritism to the prestigious members of that particular society. Social inequality is shown throughout the world from situations of race, ethnicity, gender, and age. These factors may dictate wealth, schooling, power, and prestige. The social conflict paradigm views the patterns that benefit some people more than it would others, due to their social standings. Karl Marx was a sociologist who embraced the social conflict paradigm. Marx made his main goal to not just understand society but to reduce social inequality. Karl Marx devoted his life to explaining a contradiction in society. That contradiction was "How in a society so rich, so many could be poor." Marx makes a good point here: If America is supposed to be a rich country and a free country where the streets are paved with gold and opportunity is knocking around every corner, then why is it that there are so Wheatley-3 Many poor people in America? The answer is social conflict. America does not provide the same opportunities to people from a poor family as they do with people who come from a rich and prestigious family. Two people with the same academic backgrounds and qualifications may apply for a job; however, one comes…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Money and the power" (Coolio, Gangsta's Paradise). In his song, the rap artist Coolio sings a line identifying money with power. This power that money gives the possessor is something that is spoken of and speculated by many, including Karl Marx. In his manuscript, "The Power of Money", Karl Marx expresses his beliefs on the power of money which are easily reflected in today's society.…

    • 351 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays