Preview

Kant's Corruption

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2118 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kant's Corruption
Citizens storm the streets to bring awareness to corruption. Wealthy citizens condemn progressive tax rates, claiming the government is stealing their money. Jurors meet to discuss the proper decision to make in regard to a criminal’s actions. All of these people, ranging from very different backgrounds, with very different motives, unite in a common purpose: to ensure justice is met. Likewise, American students across the country stand every morning and salute their flag, uttering this promise given by the government of the United States: “liberty and justice for all.” We all go around demanding justice, yet we do not know what it means to be just. Both Democrats and Republicans, Authoritarians and Libertarians debate about women’s reproductive …show more content…
According to Kant, such maxims, or ideals, are obtained through pure reason. This notion of pure reason is what allows us to differentiate and determine right and wrong, good and evil. Growing up in a devout Christian household like Kant, I similarly believe in Kant’s concept of pure reason; however, I refer to it as the Light of Christ, what most would call one’s conscience. All people are born with the Light of Christ, and through it, we are able to tell right from wrong and differentiate light from dark and good from evil. Through this divine gift are we, as human beings, separated from other species of life and capable of determining universal truths and moral values. Because we all have this same God-given gift, if we ignore individual desires, we should all arrive at the same conclusion as to which universal maxims we, as a community, should implement and use as the foundation of justice. Once we have used solely our conscience and the Light of Christ to discover the fundamental maxims that should be employed in a just society, only then can we pursue our …show more content…
By creating a foundation of morals and ensuring fundamental, moral rights to all citizens, the general welfare is promoted and the greatest happiness achieved in the long run. Happiness, not pleasure. Happiness is a long term feeling capable of being present in one’s life at all times. Pleasure is merely a temporary release of dopamine causing us to experiment a short-lived upbeat emotion. In this regard, I am similar to John Stuart Mill, in that I believe that a just society serves to increase the utility of people in the long run, not simply to temporarily incite

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In many societies, including our own, we labeled the meaning of the word “justice” for the sole purpose of maintaining social and political stability and order for the good of many instead of the few. However, what we believe to be just and unjust in regards to what Plato’s Republic explains about what is actually just and unjust are inadvertently blurred from a somewhat conflicting (if not unintended biased) perspective. These concepts of thought originate in a hierarchical group of knowledge: understanding, thought, belief, and imagination (Socrates 511e); most of which we use for measuring the ideal implementation of practical and critical forms of theory. What we portray justice in the United States today mostly consists of both opinionated…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, Utility, or the Greatest Happiness Principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness” (11). That quote is from “Utilitarianism” written by John Stuart Mill. Mill is noted in history as a man who pushed for radical change of social and legal principles using Utilitarianism as his guide. That quote sums up his belief in that theory. In this essay I will be discussing Mill, the theory of Utilitarianism and how that theory relates to contemporary ethical issues.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is an old saying that it is better to be lucky than good. This may be true if a person is always lucky, but luck sometimes has a tendency to run out. Making decisions that affect other people’s lives based on luck can be sometimes dangerous, and usually ethically questionable. Leaders who routinely depend on luck for success may find themselves relying on other questionable actions, such as lying, cheating, or stealing, to ensure luck stays on their side. Additionally, this type of behavior may force subordinates to make ethically questionable decisions when luck begins to run out.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher from the 18th century who is well known as an essential person in philosophy today. He has made the argument that there are a set of essential ideas that structure human experience and is the source of morality. His thought continues to have a major influence in contemporary thought, especially the fields of metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, political philosophy, and aesthetics. Kant’s theory on morality as often been criticized on being too…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant’s formulas are then treated as candidates for a universal moral criterion for the permissibility of maxims, to be tested against our intuitions regarding the best cases that inventive philosophers can devise as apparent counterexamples. If one interpretation of Kant’s formula yields counterintuitive results, then another interpretation is proposed. The fate of Kantian ethics itself, as a moral theory, is then seen as depending on this enterprise of interpretation, and how well our best interpretation of Kant’s principle fares against our intuitions about the most challenging examples against which we can test…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the most controversial aspects of Kant’s moral philosophy is his theory regarding the concept of duty. Duty is the moral necessity to perform actions for no other reason than to obey the dictates of a higher authority without any selfish inclination. Immanuel Kant states that the only moral motivation is a devotion to duty. The same action can be seen as moral if it is done for the sake of one’s duty but also as not moral (Kant distinguished between immoral and not moral) and simply praise-worthy if it is done out of inclination. Thus, to have moral worth, an action must be done from duty.…

    • 934 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    With this general happiness for everyone’s well-being, a persons priority or rights can’t take a lead or be more important over the general happiness of everybody (chapter II, p.17). This agrees with Aristotle’s, that the political functioning in a society through virtuous character are to benefit the community. Mill argues against Aristotle by claiming that because having security is the definitive right that is deserved by all people through law, certain actions, such as torture, are just in order to ensure that a person has security (Chapter 5, p.54). With this being said Utilitarianism follows a concept that is focused on the general happiness of everyone in the community, but also the happiness that comes to them through security. Mill states that there are certain qualities that show justice and injustice, and some of these qualities are that it is unjust for a person to be deprived of their legal and moral rights, but it is just that everybody should get what they deserve. According to this, torture of a person, can be justified because it will overall give people assurance of security and happiness. But, it is also unjust because it violates a person’s moral and legal rights. This is where the General Happiness Principle comes into play. The Greatest Happiness Principle holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness and wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness, which is pain (Chapter 2, p. 7). Happiness is the absence of pain or freedom of pain, which is the only thing that should be desirable as an end and people will always choose the end that is overall more desirable in pleasure (Chapter 2, p. 8). Mill clearly states, “…laws and social arrangements should place the happiness or the interest of…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Immanuel Kant states that the only thing in this world that is “good without qualification” is the good will. He states the attributes of character such as intelligence, wit, and judgment are considered good but can be used for the wrong reasons. Kant also states that the attributes of good fortune such as health, power, riches, honor, that provide one happiness can also be used in the wrong way (7). In order to understand Kant’s view of moral rightness, one must understand that only a good will is unambiguously good without qualification, it is “good in itself”. To clarify, Kant states that “a good will is good not because of what it effects or accomplishes, nor because of its fitness to attain some proposed end; it is good only through its willing, i.e. it is good in itself” (7). To Kant, a good will is the only thing that gives action moral worth. Human beings were granted with reason not only to attain self-preservation and a state of happiness, but “its true function must be to produce a will which is not merely good as a mean to some further end, but it good in itself” (9). Human beings are called to exercise reason through duty to bring a universal good to all. This duty, living according to our highest reason, must be exercised through action that is beneficial and non-contradictory to all. Duty has three major qualifications for Kant. One must recognize that duty is good in itself when an action is performed out of the need of the completion of the duty itself, such as one who abstains from supporting a large restaurant corporation that inhumanely raise cattle or poultry, because he or she recognizes that it is a duty to not perpetuate unethical practice. Or one who carefully recycles their waste not because of the pleasure of being an enlightened “green” individual, but because of the recognition that it is “good in itself” to reuse products. The second…

    • 2304 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emmanuel Kant Analysis

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Emmanuel Kant argues that the human understanding of our world is perceived by our experiences and only through them can we gain knowledge. Kant’s philosophic question is rooted in the theory of understanding; in short, what can we know and how can we know it? Most of our knowledge of the world can be derived from our observation of it. As children, we see things, touch things, smell things and so on. Gradually, we understand the world in which we live in; this is the knowledge of sense-perception. For example, wind has no physical form but we can see its effects and can classify it as being part of nature. Kant, however, perceives knowledge only through our experiences. So going back to the example of wind, Kant would say we have knowledge of wind not because we…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant was an eighteenth-century German philosopher. Essentially Kant’s most important principles for being ethical are good will and moral laws. According to Kant, a person who has the tenacity of good will influenced by moral values and act in accordance with this rather than their own desires is considered a person of goodwill. Consequently, Kant’s moral theory is deontology, which entails acting out of duty rather than inclination or desirability of idiosyncratic interests. In deontology, it is obligatory to follow ‘maxims’ as Kant call them, which are rules such as the law and moral laws. In Kantian ethics, this corresponds with Categorical Imperative, which is following the rule of, “Act only in accordance to that maxim through…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is Immanuel Kant’s basis in dealing with criminality? This basis perhaps lies on his doctrine of crime and punishment which he elaborated in his work, Metaphysic of Morals. Kant begins by defining what crime is: an act accompanied with consciousness that is transgression. For Kant, laws exist in order to protect the society and state and anyone who violates the law must be deemed guilty and therefore be punished. As Kant asserted, it is the lawgiver or legislator who command the law. He has the obligation to enforce laws and has the right to judge and impose punishment to anyone as a consequence of his culpable act of demerit.…

    • 110 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill is a utilitarian philosopher who lives by the Greatest Happiness Principle, in which there is a clear distinction between both lower and higher pleasures. Though thoroughly explained, one must also question the justification of these pleasures. Many of these beliefs leave the reader hanging on the edge, with further questions that need to be answered. What is the exact distinction between the lower and higher pleasures? And how are higher pleasures measured as most valuable? How clearly is Mill’s view of lower and higher pleasures justified?…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    John Stuart Mill, through his Greatest Happiness Principle, a set of ethical teaching known as Utilitarianism, seeks to bring about the greatest good in the world by setting into play a morality that gives happiness to the largest number of people possible. Mill argues that the purpose of morality is to benefit mankind, and thus the ultimate end of morality lies in providing the most amount of pleasure to the greatest number of people. In The Greatest Happiness Principle, human actions are measured by their consequences. For example, if one were a ruler of ten million people, and a famine had diminished the food supply to that which only half of those people could survive on; to kill off five million people would not only be justified but morally obligatory. After all, in this scenario, without the death of five million…

    • 1580 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant Do No Harm

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Concepts of right and wrong may have been part of man before he could walk on two legs. The Greek civilization solidified the ethical constructs that are pillars of morality today. Konstantinidou, Pavlides, & Fiska state “Greek mythology appears to have set the foundations for ethics and deontology in medicine and in Europe; these foundations were later used by the Hippocratic physicians in their effort to serve patients (Konstantinidou, Pavlides, & Fiska, 2016). The moral obligation to “Do no harm” is the Greek legacy and duty of all car providers, not only physicians. Utilizing Deontology in any situation generally guides one to correct moral direction.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant starts, Groundings for the Metaphysics of Morals, by explaining the difference between things that are good, and things that are good only with qualification. When it comes to the first type of good there is only one thing that counts, good will. Good will is by itself the only thing in the universe that is unconditionally good, and incorruptible. Everything else that we perceive as good, is not really good on its own and is equally capable of being bad.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays