Preview

Immanuel Kant Do No Harm

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
577 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Immanuel Kant Do No Harm
Concepts of right and wrong may have been part of man before he could walk on two legs. The Greek civilization solidified the ethical constructs that are pillars of morality today. Konstantinidou, Pavlides, & Fiska state “Greek mythology appears to have set the foundations for ethics and deontology in medicine and in Europe; these foundations were later used by the Hippocratic physicians in their effort to serve patients (Konstantinidou, Pavlides, & Fiska, 2016). The moral obligation to “Do no harm” is the Greek legacy and duty of all car providers, not only physicians. Utilizing Deontology in any situation generally guides one to correct moral direction. Deontology is rule based urging the individual to do right without other …show more content…
It allows the nature of the act to define it as right or wrong yet states that harm is unacceptable. The outcome is of little consequence. It holds that there are conflict free universal ethical rules which may be used by humans as a moral compass. The moral rules are binding at the highest to all. The 18th century philosopher Immanuel Kant introduced the the categorical imperative inferring that moral correctness constitutes universal law. For example, reason has it that lying is morally wrong. To make an exception for lying to a Nazi to protect a Jew from harm is unethical. In the exception, a new opposing absolute allowing everyone to lye is created. It is not possible to universalize lying. All people must follow the same rule. Not following the universal rule makes the action wrong. Kant states “Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of another, always at the same time as an end and never simply

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Moral Reasoning Quiz Paper

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages

    | |[pic] |[pic]B)[pic|Virtue ethics is a moral theory that focuses mainly on one's intentions. |…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deontology is a moral theory that emphasizes one’s duty to do a particular action just because the action, itself, is inherently right and not through any other sorts of calculations (Boylan, 2009). Calculations like what the consequences of that action might be. Deontology is a duty-based theory when addressing ethics and morality.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Write a 350- to 700-word essay comparing the similarities and differences between virtue theory, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics. Include the following in your essay:…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kantian ethics are ethical principles set out by Immanuel Kant (1724-1804), a German thinker from East Prussia, and arguably one of the most influential philosophers in Western philosophy. His ‘Categorical Imperative’ theory was devised from his desire to create a stand-alone ethical theory that would not rely on assumptions, hence he believed in an objective right or wrong based on reason as a pose to assumptions. According to Kant, morals are a Priori synthetic because they are absolute, existing in and of themselves, and do not need to be experienced for them to exist. However, upon testing, it is also obviously true that they are correct.…

    • 2219 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    For Immanuel Kant, guilt is considered a necessary condition for punishment and judicial punishment can never be used merely as a means to promote some other good for the criminal himself or civil society. He argues that, an offender must first be found to be deserving of punishment before any consideration is given to the utility of punishment for himself or his fellow citizens. In this view, utilitarian concerns can never justify the punishment of an innocent person while guilt itself demands punishment even where punishment is entirely devoid of social utility. Therefore, again we observe that the best action is the one that maximizes utility and can be applied in various ways, but most commonly relates to the maintenance of healthy emotional…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emmanuel Kant (hereinafter “Kant”) believes that Ethics is categorical and states that our moral duties are not dependent on feelings but on reason. He further states that our moral duties are unconditional, universally valid, and necessary, regardless of the possible consequences or opposition to our inclinations (Pojman and Vaughn 239).…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The “moral law”, according to Kant, is when one is to act in accordance with the demands of practical reason, or acting done solely out of respect of duty. He says that moral laws will make you will in a certain way and is not subject to something further. Moral laws apply to all rational being in all places at all times. Overall, he believes that morality is on a basis of a priori, or preceding experience.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The word deontology means the science of duty. Immanuel Kant, the philosopher most associated with deontology, defined a person as a reasonable, uncontrolled being who has the capacity to recognize moral laws and the power to decide to act morally or immorally, according to his/her duty (1785/2012). A person’s decisions are made by respecting others; this is our duty as humans. Kant further expanded on duty by distinguishing two types, hypothetical and categorical imperatives. Categorical imperatives are duties that are pure, outright and absolute. There are two questions Kant formulated in relation to categorical imperatives that can be asked when deciding if an action is right or wrong. Can this action be applied to every circumstance as universal law? Is the action being taken a means to an end? If the answer to the first is yes and the second no, then according to Kant, the action is morally right…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The deontological theory contends that right and wrong are determined by the consequences of an action. Deontologists do not negate that consequences are significant but they believe there are more relevant aspects to the moral duty of the action. Deontology mainly focuses on Immanuel Kant and W.D. Ross. Kant based his view on moral principles that define between right and wrong. He also views deontology as an act on any maxim if and only if you can will it into a universal law. Kant introduces that there are rules to determine situations and he also shares that we should never treat people as means to ends. In this way, rational beings should always treat each other as ends in themselves, never as only means. Kant believed that humans have intrinsic worth and we should act to respect the mortality for us and others. He also believed that when humans recognize their worth, they cannot see themselves being used as entities to an end. Kant also shows the importance of not actually doing the right thing, but doing things for the sense of duty for getting moral worth in return. W.D. Ross developed the prima facia obligations. These obligations are obligations that override other obligations. According to Ross, there are seven types of obligations: 1. Duties of fidelity, 2. Duties of reparation, 3. Duties of gratitude, 4. Duties of justice, 5. Duties of beneficence, 6. Duties of…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Deontology is an ethical theory whose name is derived from the Greek word “deon,” meaning duty or obligation. Most ethical theories are concerned with what is right or good, and they often attempt to find this by applying a rule or several rules that seem to fit with outcomes that we most commonly find are "good". Deontology is a non-consequentialist moral theory. While consequentialists, such as a utilitarian, believe the end will always justify the means, a deontologist will assert that the rightness of an action lays in the intent. It is the inherent nature of the act alone that determines its ethical standing. Deontology implies that certain actions are…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The study and evolution of medical ethics has been around for centuries. (Cassidy, Barry, Blessing and Dennis 2008) stated that “In the 5th century BC, the Hippocratic Oath was considered to be the beginning, if not the foundation of a medical code of ethics”. Medical ethics are considered to be the study of law and professionalism in the healthcare field. As many of the words spoken today derive from the Greek language, the study of medicine and the moral basis of ethics do too. However it can be concluded from the Hippocratic Oath that the study of medicine has become more informal and mechanical in new age medicine. Due to this many professionals face moral and ethical dilemmas in the work place. Medical professionals who breach the code of ethics can be sued for medical malpractice lawsuits, lose their licenses and the trust of their patients.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kant's Moral Equation

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Immanuel Kant's moral theory can be best explained by comparing it to a math equation. Kant's moral system will always hold true no matter what the circumstance just like how two plus two will always equal four. According to Kant, our lives should be lived according to maxims that can be willed into universal law (Kant, Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals, p 303). However the action regarding a moral decision is not judged by the consequences of that action, rather by the motive of that action.…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant’s Right Theory is based on a moral principle which is called the categorical imperative, which means to treat people freely and equally. In his first categorical imperative, he argued that we should act in a way only if our maxim became a universal law. (Midterm, P2) Maxim is the reason that some made a choice in a certain situation, and by looking at this maxim universally and reversely, we could determine rather this maxim is a universal law or not.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this passage Kant is stating is believes about imperatives by saying that in order to make a morally correct decision, there is a universal law that complies with all humans that can rationally think , this law is not based upon humans own desires. Kant imperatives deal with universality consequently he stated that it is immoral if a rule cannot be made into something that all humankind can follow. For example if I say "I will never keep my promises", this would be considered to be immoral because it cannot be applied to all people, consequently promises would lose all meaning.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Immanuel Kant

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Immanuel Kant believed in utilitarianism, which is the moral philosophy that says we should act in such ways as to make the greatest number of people happy as possible. This is why he introduced the categorical imperative. As a moral law, it is a command that is unqualified and not dependent on any conditions or qualifications. In short, it tells us to act in such a way that we would want everyone else to act the same way.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays