Preview

Kant's Argumentative Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
195 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kant's Argumentative Analysis
In order to discover what is moral or not, Kant believes that categorical imperative gives reasoning for any sort of action. In order to do so, one must think about the fundamental rule that goes in hand with what the person plans to fulfill in the first place. If a certain act can be applied to others and puts them in that exact situation, then it is moral. One concept of categorical imperative is known as “The Principle of Ends.” This theory describes individuals as worthy and valuable, depicting them as something worth more than a mere object. This pairs with the saying “treat others as you would like to be treated.” On a general status, I believe that this should be the correct thing to do. Concerning Kant, I disagree with his argument

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Elizabeth C. Stanton was born in Johnston, New York. As a lawyer, Stanton’s father did not have a need for slaves thus creating the anti-slavery sentiment. Stanton was informed of the abolitionist, and women’s rights movements through her cousin, Gerrit Smith. Furthermore, her husband Henry Stanton was a lawyer who dedicated his knowledge to reforms present in the mid 19th century. Being surrounded by reformers had a great impact on Elizabeth C. Stanton as she used her knowledge from Willard’s Troy Female Seminary to further become a women’s rights activist.…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The question of should the United States seek to remain the “indispensable” country? Creates discussions for former U.S. Senator Hilary Clinton and published scholar and fellow member of the Cato Institute, Ted Galen Carpenter. Each orator discusses their position with reasons supporting their stance on the matter.…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant, worked on ethics and wrote two general schools of thoughts. The first theory is consequentialist moral theories, which divides the thought of right and wrong based on the outcome and it consequence of an action, therefore the end justifies the means.The second theory is deontology which is similar to consequentialist but instead right and wrong based upon oneself. Thus categorical imperative was introduced, categorical imperative is based upon kant's idea that morality is derived by rationality and all moral judgement are rationally supported, in other words what’s right is right and what’s wrong is wrong. In more detail into categorical Imperative, there are three maxim, first maxim is all your actions must have universality. therefore for if you want to do something it must be okay for everyone else to do it, as Kant uses suicide as an example he says “is it contrary to my duty to take my life if i am in despair due to my many misfortunes? First, i should ask what if all though this way and acted upon it and became a law of nature” Second Maxim is every human should be treated as a end and not a mean, which means you’re not obligated nor allowed to manipulate someone no matter what. Third maxim one should act like you're the moral authority of the entire universe. As we compare this to Friedrich Nietzsche’s thoughts on morality we notice difference. immanuel Kant in…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant’s end in itself theory is stated by him, “Act in such a way that you always treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, never simply as a means but always at the same time as an end.” This explains that if we use another person, whether directly or indirectly, in actions we make that we not just use them to get what we want in the end, our maxim, but also in way that also benefits their personal ends, or goals, also.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, Grendel’s last words are “ Poor Grendel’s had an accident,” I whisper. “So may you all” (Gardner 174). Grendel is cursing the animals around him. For instance, when Grendel illustrates that he doesn’t like animals. This is when he has several incidences with the animals. Likewise, Grendel yelled “I smile, threatened by an animal already dead, still climbing” (Gardner 140). Grendel felt threatened by the animal, therefore he had to kill the goat. The goat trespassed on Grendel’s rock, making Grendel dislike the goat because the goat wouldn’t leave his rock. Also, Grendel implies “Why can’t these creatures discover a little dignity”(Gardner 6). The animals bother Grendel a lot of times. Grendel is just trying to be alone. He doesn’t…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In one of the grand theories of Freud vs. Erikson, I am strongly in favor of Erikson’s ideas as opposed to Sigmund Freud, in the fact that I agree that children’s developmental stages are more psychosocial than psychosexual. For example, I have two children of my own which I can correlate a lot of their behavior to Erikson’s stages. Babies cry in signal to their parents that something is wrong, when they feel nurtured and either the mother or father tend to their needs, such as diapering or feeding then they gain a sense of trust in their caregivers. My two year old son is at the stage now of initiative vs. guilt; whereas he has an adventurous spirit that leads him to “undertake many adult like activities” (Berger, 2014, p. 40). He is strong…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an effort to establish boundaries for the use of faith in argument, Locke offers descriptions of faith and reason as well as their proper usage. Although Locke believes both can be used to acquire knowledge it’s no secret that he places a strong preference on reason. So much so, that Locke regards all knowledge gained through faith alone as unreliable unless validated by reason.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s essays Critique of Pure Reason and Critique of Practical Reason led to his critique Religion Within the Limits of Reason Alone.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first priority of any circumstance and the greatest value is human rights. No one should be treated as just a means, each person should be given a sense of humanity. As he announces in this, “So act as to treat humanity, whether in thine own person or in that of any other, in every case as and withal, never as means only.” (Vaughn, p.105). Kant’s view of punishment is that any crime no matter what it is, they should not be punished for justice. As he says in this, “Kant thinks that criminals should be punished only because they perpetrated crimes; the public good is irrelevant. In addition, Kant thinks that the central principle of punishment should fit the crime.” (Vaughn,…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This reading “What Is Enlightenment?”, is written by Kant. Kant claims that man does not use their own enlightenment because there are other people with higher intelligence that can make the hard decisions for them and, that, the people listening will obey. Kant supports his claim that mankind does not utilize their enlightenment because they do not have freedom, they are lazy, and cannot escape their own nonage.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli's end states, “A strong and stable state that functions for the good of the whole.” Niccolo also stated that the end justifies the means. Niccolo believed that it was fine to have casualties as long as it was quick and only one time. If you had to keep fighting and killing people, it wasn't Machiavellian. The current drone attacks on people that are seen as terrorists are not Machiavellian. The drone attacks are fast and get the job done but you have to keep using more drones. America has already sent more 470 drones. The drones would have been Machiavellian if it was one big attack that killed everyone if the end justified the mean but sending more than 470 is not really ending the problem. The drones have also killed plenty…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Through the research I conducted I realized that Kant did in fact have some very surprising views on punishment as well as what is acceptable and unacceptable. The ideas he had based upon capital punishment and the rehabilitation of criminals are vastly different than the other. Kantianism is based off of deontology which sees that, “the nature of ethical rules is to bind you to your duty, and that binding is not dependent on consequences” (Waller, Bruce N).…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The proof that categories of the understanding and a transcendental unity of apperception are necessary condition for the possibility of experience is what Immanuel Kant claims to be the “Transcendental Deduction”. By this, Kant intends to address and attack one main problem: how we, as humans, can know that the categories apply to experience. From logic, we can easily conclude that empirical concepts are applicable to experience due to the simple fact that they are derived from experience in the first place. Kant is attempting to discover how we can determine that experience must conform to the categories. In doing so, he provides us with twelve categories which are then split into four more specific sections: the categories of Modality, the…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unlike the hypothetical imperative, the categorical imperative uses ends not means so is non-consequentialist. Therefore, it is wrong to use someone or something to achieve a certain outcome. For example, to be kind to my mum simply so she gives me money to go shopping. Kant would object to…

    • 1087 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy Notes on Kant

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Morality is entirely determined by what someone wills because a good will is the only thing that is good with out provocations. Every other character trait is only morally good once we qualify it as such. Kant morality is all about what someone wills and not about the end result or consequence is. Someone can be happy but for immoral reasons. Kant it is really the thought that counts. Motivation is everything. What does Bentham and Mills look at consequences and happiness. Kant thinks of these things as matter of riddle in the game of morality. Think of it this way. If we think of someone as our favorite moral hero in past and present because of the various things they did, accomplish, brought about. All you are doing when you admire such people is judging results. What we see. But if we are really judging moral worth on what we see we are then failing to adjudicate moral worth entirely. After all we have no idea what the shop clerks real motives are. Perhaps she is honest because she thinks this is the best way to make money. If this wasn’t her true motivation she may start ripping people off as soon as she could. Think back to what glaucon says. He says it is better to appear to be moral than to really be moral. Kant believes this is a much more comman way of going aobut things that it probably happens most of the time given that many people don’t have moral motivations that we really have no way of knowing what peopole’ motivations are. Perhaps Abraham Lincoln and MLK motivations were not stemmed form good will at all but only for honor, fame or fortune. We simply don’t know. Remember there are many people who were unlucky failed to bring any results even thought they hated good will or moral principles. They are forever unknown they are forever anonymous. He says we should stick to what pure reason tells and tells us it doesn’t care about consequences, doesn’t care about actions, doesn’t care about results. It cares…

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays