Fraud is generally defined as an omission of a material fact or a misrepresentation of the truth, intended for personal gain or to cause loss to another party. The act of fraud is most commonly committed in order to deprive another of money, property, or a legal right. Fraud is considered criminal activity, and anyone who is affected by a fraudulent act has the ability to file a lawsuit to collect damages. J.C. Penny was accused of marking up the prices on their products and then discounting them to the original price in order to trick customers into thinking they were receiving heavy discounts and better deals. J.C. Penny committed this act for their own personal gain, and in doing so, they deprived their customers of money that they would…
Today in the United States as well as all around our world, one of the most contested and debated issues, that everyone has some sort of opinion on is the subject of abortion. There are many different thoughts, ideals, and opinions on whether or not abortion is right, wrong, or even morally sane to do. There are clinics and hospitals that perform the procedures and at many of these locations there are groups who will hold protests against the operation as well as those who support it. But all of those issues are not what this essay is going to be about, this is going to inform you about whether or not all arguments about the subject abortion come down to the question of what is the moral status of the fetus.…
Sumner begins his article with an explanation of the interconnectivity between the moral status of the fetus and the moral status of abortion--that is, whether abortion is morally permissible or not. He argues that since allotting moral standing to a being affects the rights that we give to it, we cannot understand the morality or immorality of abortion without first determining whether or not the fetus has moral standing (Sumner 1992, p. 33). As a result, Sumner attempts to determine if and when the fetus has moral standing and the conditions that will determine this. Before he dives into this endeavour however, he first outlines the "established" views on abortion, including how they are similar, how they are different, and ultimately, why they are both flawed.…
His decision falls within the criticism that utilitarianism has. By not giving his kidney to his daughter, it could seem as though he’s taking her rights away of living a better life to benefit more people in the long run. It seems as though the father is keeping in mind the rest of the family. It could be probable that his fear of the surgery, affected his thinking that something may happen to kip while in surgery. He could keep in mind if something happens to him it could be a detrimental situation for the family including his daughter. By not going into surgery, he is benefiting the rest of the…
Kant gives the idea of the sanctity of life a non-religious perspective based on ethical grounds. He considers each human life sacred, and said that everyone has potential to have a good life, therefore against abortion as he believes life starts from conception. Abortion cannot be justified in Kantian ethics if it simply concerns itself because the foetus has…
Judith Thomson’s argument through her article, “A Defence of Abortion” is one that adopts the premise that the fetus is a human being from the moment of conception. By doing this, Thomson is distancing her argument from the various theorists who maintain the moral view that it is wrong to kill another human being, such as (Marquis, 1989). This ultimately allows her to assume various hypothetical situations in which the cognitive status of the fetus is otherwise not considered. This is important. It helps the case she develops to detach itself from the focal points considered in the 'common argument', which illustrates that the development of a human being from conception through birth into childhood and then adulthood is continuous, and to draw a line where abortion is acceptable is futile. Thomson’s argument that contrasts a “right to life” against a “right to decide what happens in and to one’s body" is based on what Finnis describes as “confusing the issue” (Finnis, 1973). Throughout the article, her various thought experiments are presented in order to support and help the reader identify situations in which the permissibility of abortion seems just. This essay will scrutinise the effectiveness of Thomson’s ideas, and whether they have led to a more definable understanding when defending abortion.…
I believe that all living organisms have a moral status but I also believe in quality of life. The mother should be able to carry the child full term but she should also consider the consequences such as the long term care and resources the child will require. When it is born it may cause stress on the parents and likely on the aunt because they will no longer be able to move out of her house. It may break up the marriage and cause inconsistencies in the child’s…
All things considered, there is a potential flaw in Warren’s third premise. He claims that we should (695). However, in her argument, Warren didn’t clearly define what a person is. For example, In fact, some dolphins are even self-aware enough to recognize th Seeing as how there are many similarities between humans and personhood. It is possible that Kant’s moral theory doesn’t have to end in an abortion.…
Marco and Jessica are hit with great news that Jessica is pregnant, however, due to financial restraints Jessica and Marco have not been seeing a physician on a regular basis. Jessica and Marco seem to be barely catching up financially and finally have an opportunity to move out of aunt Marias home to their own place. The situation is looked upon from different moral views. According to Dr. Wilson the best course of action would be for Jessica to have an abortion. Dr. Wilson seems to have mentioned abortion as a viable option for Jessica because the fetus is not developing correctly. According to the ultrasound that Dr. Wilson performed on Jessica it seems that the baby will not develop arms and will have Down syndrome.…
A person who believes in Kant’s theory would argue that abortion is impermissible, because it’s not the right thing to do. Kant believes no matter the circumstances that happened to cause the pregnancy, it still wrong to kill a person. For example, if a women were to get pregnant from rape, or she can’t afford to raise a child, its morally wrong to terminate the fetus. Kant also follows the formula of the universalizability test, the universal law states that the “actions must apply to everyone and always result in good.” (McKnight). For example, with the topic of abortion, if every woman that were to get pregnant resulted to an abortion than humans would be an extinct race. Since abortion doesn’t follow the universalizability test and the action of killing is wrong no matter the circumstance, then abortion is immoral and not permissible by the Kantian…
A highly controversial topic is abortion, and if it should or should not be legal. This situation is closely related to Jocasta’s situation, as both circumstances predetermine a life not worth living, due to various reasons like, racism, wealth, persecution, and so on. However, predetermining a life before it is even born is irrational, as Ronald Reagan said “I've noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born.” Thus, the other option to abortion is adoption, as it allows the child to have a chance to live. Likewise, Jocasta used the same logic to spare her kid, and allow it to have a chance to live. Hence, if we made the same decision as her, does that mean we are perfectly evil, I think otherwise, it makes us and her perfectly…
We recognize no single, universal, objective moral truth that determines our moral decisions. On the contrary, we must consider a broad range of values whenever we seek to make wise, ethical, and compassionate choices. We respect a woman's moral capacity to make decisions regarding her health and welfare, including reproductive decisions.…
I am against Kant’s Theory on the ruling of an action to be right or wrong regarding to autonomy on the situation of abortion. Killing child life is not morally right because it goes against the principle maleficent. Sometime the circumstances of is a pregnancy are tragic because some of the woman could be raped. Maybe the baby has been diagnosed with a defect, and the woman’s health might be at risk. However, one tragedy is not solution with another. Abortion is do not erase a rape by killing a child. We don’t have to be cure a baby by taking life. And we do not avoid all health issues by avoiding the reality of another human being. If mother raped taking innocent life is not right thing and it’s not the solution too. A child does not deserve…
In the Anna Quindlen’s article I believe her greatest argument was the quote“for years I believed that a woman’s right to choose was absolute, but now I wonder. Do I, with a stable home and marriage and sufficient stamina and money, have the right to choose abortion because a pregnancy is inconvenient right now? Legally I do have that right; legally I want to always to have that right. It is the morality of exercising it under those circumstances that makes me wonder.” So we can easily understand that woman have the rights to choose to go through the abortion process or choose to not to go through it and no one can take that from them. With this essay, I believe people can also understand that making the decision to have an abortion and give up your baby can be the hardest decision you can ever make because it can mentally and physically leave an impact on your life.…
For the same reason, Thomson says, abortion does not violate the fetus' right to life but merely deprives the fetus of something—the use of the pregnant woman's body—to which it has no right. Thus, it is not that by terminating her pregnancy a woman violates her moral obligations, but rather that a woman who carries the fetus to term is a 'Good Samaritan' who goes beyond her obligations…