Preview

Juvenile Death Penalty

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1336 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Juvenile Death Penalty
How Old is Old Enough?
Should juveniles receive the death penalty for murder? In my opinion there is no yes or no answer to this question it all depends on your personal views and beliefs. Juveniles have been executed in the United States as far back as 1642. That first execution took place in Plymouth Colony, Massachusetts. There have been 361 people put to death for crimes committed when they were under the age of 18 in United States. There are other countries that execute juveniles, such as Iran, Saudi Arabia and Sudan. Most countries do not believe in the practice of executing juveniles. The United States abolished the execution of juvenile offenders under the age of 18 in 2005. The case before the United States Supreme Court was
…show more content…
Studies have shown that a teen 's brain is not completely developed and that is the reason that they make such poor judgments. Juveniles who have been abused or come from broken homes may get into trouble because of their harsh backgrounds. Attempts should be made to rehabilitate young offenders, if at all possible. I think death penalty for juveniles is an extreme form of punishment for juveniles. Young as they are, they have a great chance at turning their lives around for the better. They can still change with proper guidance. Other studies have shown that the abuse and neglect adolescents experienced as children can create aggressive behavior. It is common knowledge that growing up in conditions that adversely affect children 's emotional and physical growth can convince them that violence is acceptable. Therefore, it is unjust to hold those children completely at fault. Sure, they are responsible for their actions to a certain extent, but other factors including parental influence and the entertainment industry may also be liable for violent behavior. I do believe if parents were made to face consequences for the acts of their children it would reduce the number of juveniles ending up in the prison …show more content…
I think 6 years old is to young but Lowering the maximum age of juvenile court jurisdiction is one of the most drastic steps a state can take, because it moves an entire age group of adolescents into the adult system. State legislatures and the federal government have turned increasingly to the more punitive adult model, requiring that even pre-teen children in some instances be treated as if they were equal in culpability and understanding to adults who commit similar crimes. I see the importance of minors being placed in the juvenile system because of the services which are available to offenders. By "providing intensive supervision, meaningful treatment, and rehabilitation to sixteen- and seventeen-year-olds in juvenile court, rather than trying and incarcerating them with adult defendants in criminal courts and prisons, would lower recidivism rates" whereas "youth who are tried and sentences as adults have been shown to receive little or no education services, mental health or substance abuse treatment, job training, or any other type of rehabilitative

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Many people around the nation have different views on the subject of juvenile justice. Some believe that despite the children's age, they should still be tried as an adult if a serious crime is committed. On the other hand, some believe children should not be tried as adult even if they commit a rather serious crime. I firmly that these children should not be sentenced to life in prison despite the serious crime that they have committed and should have another shot at life when their brain is fully developed.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are multiple reasons that allow individuals to have their own opinions considering children and how they should be treated and tried in criminal cases. Many people today believe that teenagers should not be tried to mandatory life in prisons because their brains are not fully developed to make wise decisions which means they lack common sense. While others believe juveniles should be sentenced to mandatory life in prison because teenagers have plenty of common sense and at their age can identify right from wrong and are also aware of the consequences that they will encounter. I believe juveniles should not be tried to mandatory life in prison for their heinous crimes because they are still underdeveloped and are less mature compared to…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Typically, juveniles who display a propensity for committing crime will continue to do so, even as they get older. Their crimes may even become more serious in nature. Therefore, teens that commit heinous crimes should be punished for their obnoxious behavior. In “Juvenile Doesn’t Deserve Life Sentences” by Gail Garinger, he states that “a juvenile doesn’t deserve life in prison because most teens haven’t reached their full maturity”.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles are able to commit adult crimes. For that reason juveniles should be able to have an adult sentence. If juveniles are willing to do the crime, they should do the big time. Jennifer Jenkins said "She begged for the life…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As of June 2012, juveniles who committed murder could not be sentenced to life in prison because it violates the eighth amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment,however justices argue that mandatory sentences reflected the will of American society that heinous crimes committed by juveniles should be punished by life in prison.Juveniles should not be treated like adults because their brain is not fully developed. Juveniles are still immature and they are still risk taking and learning self control.I think Juveniles should not be sentenced to life in prison because they still have a chance to rehabilitate themselves and their brain is not fully developed causing them to make bad choices.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, there is a national debate about what to do with juveniles in the criminal justice system. This debate is a result changes in practice throughout United States. The United States made it possible to try juveniles as adults in court after the case of Kent vs. the United States in 1966. The change in legislation is relatively new due to the fact that juvenile courts have "for most of the past century, treated youngsters between 7 and 17 not as criminals but as delinquents." The United States choose to treat the kids as delinquents because there was a major focus on rehabilitation rather than punishment.…

    • 4926 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentenced As Adults

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are many teenagers who do violent crimes, but to many people it’s different on how they should be punished. Most people who I spoke to said it all depends upon the crime and then there are some people who think the teenagers’ accused of the violent crime should be sentenced as adults, because they chose to act like adults. While it is wrong to commit a violent crime for a young teenager, I believe that they should not be sentenced as adults, because they have not yet developed full cognitive ability, should have the opportunity to counseling, and they should have a chance at life for a new beginning.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty for juveniles is a serious injustice issue. The death penalty for juveniles began with the English common law and the first who was executed was out of Massachusetts in 1642. Over the course of history, children could be tried in court as early as seven years of age. Children are vulnerable to so many different things throughout their young lives. These things involve peer pressure, stress, controlling their emotions, and more. More than likely, juveniles sentence to the death penalty come from homes where they are already physically, mentally, and emotionally abused, low income backgrounds, and other types of unstable environments. In the juvenile justice system, most believe the juveniles can be rehabilitated with effective counseling and mentoring programs. Sentencing a child to the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment. These children do not think of the crimes alone. There…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles are considered juveniles and should be given juvenile punishment unless it's for something inhumane, such as murder. The United States of America has the highest teen murder rate out of every country. The reason is due to guns being easy to get, the amount of violence they see today, and the T.V. programs shown. The 2012 Supreme Court decision to abolish mandatory life in prison for juveniles who commit murder was not a just decision, because teens should know better. They're old enough to know murder is wrong. Our country should give teens the punishment they deserve for the crime they commit. Murder deserves a life sentence whether a juvenile or grown adult.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should juveniles who commit adult offence like murder, rape and armed robbery etc. be charged or dealt with as an adult? The primary difference in dealing with a juvenile meaning a person that is 18 years or younger the goal is not to punish the juvenile, but rather rehabilitate, is that fair? Or is society as a whole are guilty and to blame for forsaking the future generation? The juvenile offences are skyrocketing at an alarming rate that it is hard to view the graphic and horrific crimes of the juvenile as being anything but civil or delinquent, especially when the juvenile is committing bloody murder.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Justice means that the punishment should fit the crime. Justice means allowing our fellow Americans that made mistakes and paid their debt to society and rejoin their community as active rehabilitated citizens.” These are the words spoken by former United States President Obama during his movement to reform the criminal justice system. The main focus of this reform was to target the juvenile aspect of punishment, specifically life sentencing against juvenile offenders. I believe that yes punishment should fit the crime, but to sentence a juvenile to a life sentencing without parole is something that the United States should be ashamed of doing for all these years before the true decision to disband this in 2012.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S. stands alone as the only country that sentence people to life without parole for crimes committed turning 18. Most of the approximately 3,000 individuals sentenced to life without possibility of parole now have a chance for release in the wake of recent Supreme Court decisions. The choice to allow teenagers to receive the harshest available sentence is not shared among all states. I believe they should receive life without parole if they committed any murder because it is the law and they broke it. Also another reason, is because it is the victim and the family of the victims right to press charges. Lastly, they are deterrent to crime under the age of 18. Nineteen states and the district of Columbia do not have any prisoners serving life without parole for crimes committed as juveniles, either due to laws prohibiting the sentence or because there are no individuals serving the sentence at this time.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The topic about executing Juveniles legally is an unsure topic, which is very discussable. The first know killed Juvenile offender, happened in 1642. He was legally executed, his name is Thomas Graunger. Since that execution 361 individuals have since gotten the death penalty There is a lot of arguing about this topic and people can´t get to a solution, this works out for everybody. There are people for keeping the death penalty for juveniles offenders and then there are those against as well.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles who commit first or second degree murder should not receive a mandatory sentence of life without parole. The majority of supreme court justices believes that it should not be mandatory to sentence juveniles to life without parole because violates the eighth amendment. The Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution states that excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. What's the point of the United States Constitution if its not being used in the supreme court system. Teens should not be charged with a life sentence because teens do not have the same rights as an adult and a teenager's brain is not fully developed until age twenty-nine, additional research has found that adult and teen brains work differently.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Juveniless Death Penalty

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Juveniles and the death penalty is a hotly debated issue in the criminal justice system. There are two different views on the death penalty some are for and some are against the punishment. Some see juveniles as young and influential and deserve a second chance to clean up and become a productive member of society, while others feel the punishment should fit the crime; no matter what age.…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics