Preview

Justice with Michel Sandel

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2049 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Justice with Michel Sandel
Justice with Michel Sandel
Silvia Molina
University of Texas at El Paso

Justice with Michel Sandel
Harvard university professor Dr. Michel Sandel introduces two lecture episodes that discuss a number of philosophy related issues. In the first episode “The Moral Principles” Dr. Sandel begins the lecture with a story of a trolley cart in a path that may lead kill one, or five people. The decision to kill the one person in oppose to five, is left to a show of hands by participating students. The hypothetical scenario he paints in the story is to introduce moral reasoning. The students then participate in a critical thinking discussion to conclude what would be morality correct, whether to kill the one person so that five should live or vise versa. His story quickly unfolds to introduce two moral principles, one being consequentialist moral reasoning and the second is categorical moral reasoning. In the second part of his first lecture, Dr. Sandel discusses a very popular nineteenth century law case involving an ocean stranded crew of four. Sandel proceeds to initiate the discussion of the principles of utilitarian philosopher, Jeremy Bentham. The inauguration of arguments of utilitarianism follows what is discussed in the second episode “Putting a Price Tag on Life/How to Measure Pleasure”. The lecture in episode two also includes discussions of critical thinking and arguments by the students to support their contrasting views. Part one of the second episode discusses the cost benefit analysis that companies follow to put a price on human life. The second part in episode two introduces British philosopher John Stuart Mill who argues that utilitarian, those who have experienced high pleasure and lower pleasures will desire the higher pleasure. Utilitarianism is further debated in the lectures of Dr. Sandel as he goes in to details showing how utilitarianism plays a large role in everyday life circumstances as well as in economic situations.
The Moral



References: Episode 01 - Justice with Michael Sandel. (n.d.). Justice with Michael Sandel - Online Harvard Course Exploring Justice, Equality, Democracy, and Citizenship. Retrieved June 12, 2012, from http://www.justiceharvard.org/2011/03/episode-01/#watch Episode 02 - Justice with Michael Sandel. (n.d.). Justice with Michael Sandel - Online Harvard Course Exploring Justice, Equality, Democracy, and Citizenship. Retrieved June 12, 2012, from http://www.justiceharvard.org/2011/02/episode-two/#watch Jeremy Bentham, Principles of Morals and Legislation (1780) - Justice with Michael Sandel. (n.d.). Justice with Michael Sandel - Online Harvard Course Exploring Justice, Equality, Democracy, and Citizenship. Retrieved June 13, 2012, from http://www.justiceharvard.org/resources/jeremy-bentham-principles-of-morals-and-legislation-1780/ The Queen vs Dudley and Stephens (1884) (The Lifeboat Case) - Justice with Michael Sandel. (n.d.). Justice with Michael Sandel - Online Harvard Course Exploring Justice, Equality, Democracy, and Citizenship. Retrieved June 15, 2012, from http://www.justiceharvard.org/resources/the-queen-vs-dudley-and-stephens-1884-the-lifeboat-case/

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    The Department of Justice and Equality: Restorative Justice. (2009, June 11). Retrieved May 01, 2011, from AN ROINN DLI AGUS CIRT AGUS COMHION ANNAIS: http://www.justice.ie/en/jelr/pages/restorative_justice…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter four in Sandel’s book “Justice” talks about markets and morals. In this chapter we consider the morality of paying people to perform different types of work such as fighting wars and bearing children. The question that stands is whether there should be a market, when money is involved, to the aspect of morality. One good example that Sandel portrays in this chapter is “Pregnancy for Pay.” Thinking through the rights and wrongs in this example helps clarify the differences among leading theories of justice.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Riley, Jonathan. Liberal Utilitarianism: social choice theory and J.S.Mill’s Philosophy. Cambridge England; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Maximizing Welfare Essay

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    People always sway the limitations of freedom for personal gain. “The idea that justice means respecting freedom and individual rights” has been tossed about in our courts and communities tirelessly. Part of the basis of the United States is freedom; the bill of rights lists ways in which the government must respect people’s most basic freedoms. Sandel talks about two different camps, the laissez-faire camp and the fairness camp, each arguing for freedoms but in their own way. The laissez-faire camp doesn’t believe in government or community policies, but in each person’s voluntary choices. However, the fairness camp believes “justice requires policies that remedy social and economic disadvantages” which in turn will give everyone a shot. An example of moral judgment and freedom is the first amendment in the Bill of Rights. Everyone is granted the freedom to talk about whatever they please, whether it upsets other or not. In certain situations although a right some things should not be said and knowing that difference takes moral judgment.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Week 3 Justice Theory

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Rawls believes the utilitarian view does not place the necessary emphasis on individuals, and though he agrees with many aspects of contractarianism, he wishes to improve beyond the classic versions of the social contract (Jurik, 2016, p. 7). Consequently, he endeavors to advance the concept of utilitarianism, and marry it with the social contract theory through his inclusions of the “veil of ignorance” perspective and the “difference principle”. Rawls’ terms his overall advancement as, “justice as fairness” (Rawls, 1993, p.48). In his 1993 article, Justice as Fairness, Rawls claims, “justice as fairness, I would now understand as a reasonable, systematic and practicable conception of justice for a constitutional democracy, a conception that offers an alternative to the dominant utilitarianism of our tradition of political thought” (p.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Rawls Vs Nozick

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Regarding justice in a society, both John Rawls and Robert Nozick express differing opinions on the best way to reach this. Both philosophers illustrate what they feel justice to be and offer support for their ideas in their efforts to put forth the best argument. Before being able to decide on which argument is the strongest, it is best to understand the ideas each philosopher possesses in order to compare and contrast them.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kant's Corruption

    • 2118 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Citizens storm the streets to bring awareness to corruption. Wealthy citizens condemn progressive tax rates, claiming the government is stealing their money. Jurors meet to discuss the proper decision to make in regard to a criminal’s actions. All of these people, ranging from very different backgrounds, with very different motives, unite in a common purpose: to ensure justice is met. Likewise, American students across the country stand every morning and salute their flag, uttering this promise given by the government of the United States: “liberty and justice for all.” We all go around demanding justice, yet we do not know what it means to be just. Both Democrats and Republicans, Authoritarians and Libertarians debate about women’s reproductive…

    • 2118 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Michael Sandel's Justice

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The beginning of the novel captured my attention with the mention of Hurricane Charley and price gouging. Being a victim of Katrina, I understand what it is like to have to deal with price gouging after hurricanes. When Sandel mentions the exuberant pries after Hurricane Charley, I could relate. After a hurricane, you will pay just about anything to get your house fixed. Therefore, I oppose price gouging because I have been in the position of the buyer, and I know what it feels like to be obliged to pay inflated prices. I believe price gouging is injust. I feel as though a nation should come together during a time of stress rather than exploit the people by raising prices. However, after reading this chapter, I really questioned what is just and what is not. I thought all along that whatever was moral was also just. Then, Sandel brings in the example of the trolley.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Service jobs now account for around three quarters of all jobs in the UK, with retail and hospitality alone providing nearly five million jobs (Hospitality Training Foundation, 2003; University of Warwick, 2004). Organization in the hospitality industry vary enormously, ranging from first class and luxury hotels providing extravagant, full 24-hour service to the more homely comforts of a bed and breakfast establishment; from fast food restaurants to Michelin starred restaurant. In turn, the jobs provided by these organizations demand a variety of skills and attributes from those employees interacting with customers.…

    • 3083 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rawls And Nozick

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In a broad sense, both Rawls and Nozick agree that the legitimacy of a just society is highly dependent on the emphasis of liberty for its citizens. For Rawls, it is the first principal of justice, and though he presupposes equal liberty as a basic right for each person, he makes a point to prioritize its importance. Rawls outlines some basic liberties, including political liberties, equal treatment under the law, and the freedom to hold personal property (Rawls, 677). Nozick agrees with this emphasis on liberty, adhering to its presence as fundamentally important in a just society. He takes Rawls’ inclusion of personal property even further, making it the centerpiece of his argument by demonstrating its primary standing in a just society…

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jeremy Bentham, an 18th century English philosopher and social reformer, founded the very ideology of utilitarianism. As previously mentioned, it can be identified as maximizing happiness over pain. This theory had such a profound effect on the field of ethics that it has transcended to many other fields. It is said that its core is seen today in most of our policies and laws; it is engrained in our nature to promote happiness or widely shared morals. In the end, the ethical dilemma of life—or conflicting moral question—lies within what society believes to be lead to happiness and what will result in pain.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    social justice assignment

    • 2388 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Norman. D (1987:145) explains that “John Rawls is widely known for his theory of justice as fairness, which develops principals of justice to govern a modern social order. Rawls theory provides a frame work that explains the significance, ion society assumed to consist of free and equal persons, of political and personal liberties, of equal opportunities, and cooperative arrangements that benefit the more and the less advantaged members of society.” It can be seen that John Rawls discusses his own theory of social justice,…

    • 2388 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Justice and Social Equity

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In order to bring about balance system of government, where all citizens will enjoy equal rights and opportunities, society must aspire to ensure that the civil and human rights of all individuals be protected and preserved regardless of cultural, social and demographic orientation of persons (Justice as a Virtue). In this light, the role of individual citizens, law makers, as well as, public administrators have been underscored aimed at providing a redress to injustices and inequalities that exist and may arise in social relationships of persons (Frederickson, 2005). The concept of justice and social equity are both ethical theories aimed at bridging the gap of inequalities in the just society (nancy-carre.blogspot.com/ -International Paradigms, February 24, 2012).…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Economic framework that each society has, resulted in the different distribution of economic benefits and burdens across fellows of the society. These economic frameworks are the outcome of human political processes and they constantly change both across societies and within societies over time. This economic distribution of benefits and burdens affect the people’s lives. Arguments about which framework and resulting distributions are morally preferable, constitutes the topic of Distributive Justice. Also whenever we read about Justice, we always come crossway the word “Distributive Justice”. This notion of Distributive Justice was widely discussed by John Rawls in his various books. According to him, Distributive Justice is the justice in the distribution of wealth and goods. He also talked about end-state conceptions of distributive justice which says that there is some overall pattern of distribution we should aim at. He further said that Justice is a matter of closeness to the desired pattern. Distributive justice, a theory based on writings of John Rawls, has a major attention of distributing assets fairly among a dynamic and diverse group of members from a community. Rawls said that men have a right to equal respect and concern in the design of political institutions. Principles of Distributive Justice are therefore best thought of as providing moral guidance for the political processes and structures that affect the distribution of economic benefits and burdens in societies.…

    • 3526 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    the good” (Sandel 82). Sandel then explains that constitution and laws of a just society…

    • 1365 Words
    • 1 Page
    Powerful Essays