Preview

justice of law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
782 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
justice of law
AND JUSTICE FOR ALL

Justice is defined as the quality of being fair and reasonable, though our justice system today is the opposite of just that; fair and reasonable. Though some receive justice, some are left without justice for themselves or their loved ones. It is especially disappointing when those who are innocent are wrongly convicted of crimes they didn’t commit, but are unable to provide solid evidence and proof of their innocence.
It took Donald Marshall Jr. 11 years to get justice; in the meantime he spent his time in jail. The court failed to have solid evidence that he was the murderer, they later found out who the real culprit was, a man who is described as having a fetish for knives. The court hadn’t taken the time to solve this case in the first place; if they had then perhaps Mr. Marshall wouldn’t have had to spend 11 years of his life in jail. On January 26 1990, when Mr. Marshall was cleared of the charges, Alexander Hickman, the then Chief Justice of the Trial Division of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland said "The criminal justice system failed Donald Marshall Jr. at virtually every turn from his arrest and wrongful conviction for murder in 1971 up to and even beyond his acquittal by the Court of Appeal in 1983, I really hope that at long last one Donald Marshall Jr. will stand high in the eyes of Nova Scotians, where he deserves to stand”; with that he was also given $700,000 by the provincial government. Some may take the money and think it’s enough for what they’ve been through; others may feel that no money in the world can make for what they have been through in those years they had to spend in jail.
In the film”…And Justice For All” we see judge Flemming use blackmail to get Arthur Kirkland to defend him, which he believes will show everyone just how innocent he is; if a man who hates him can defend him then he must be innocent. They had made a deal that Kirkland would defend Flemming or else he gets disbarred if he refuses.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    There is no justice if there is no trial and there is no trial when the legal system is engaging in unethical…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Court Systems Paper

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The court system was formed to separate the innocent from the guilty when a disparity has surfaced or developed. In the criminal justice system everyone is entitled to a fair and unbiased trial. We will be identifying and describing the distinguishing features of the major court system ranging from state level, superior court and federal district court through the U.S. Supreme Court. Second we will discuss the key players, jurisdiction rules, and interpretation on issues and the effect of evolving technologies on the court proceeding at all levels in the court system.…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case About Anthony Tan

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Anthony Tan was one of the most wanted men as he was allegedly charged for murder of Bosnian refugee and Rebels bikie, Edin “Boz” Smajovic. After 2 years building an export business in Vietnam, he read a media report from NSW, describing him as one of the state’s most wanted men. He was unaware for 2 years of the police hunt for him. He immediately got on the phone, first his lawyer, then to an airline. He was more than willing to return to Australia to fight his allegations. In the end he was arrested and charged for the murder and held on remand in prison for over a year. When he granted bail in August, his trial was to start that same week. Both Anthony Tan and co-accused Nathan Keith Reddy and taken to court. Once the case reached the Supreme Court, the case was dismissed even before the trial had started. This was because, it was understood that the case failed partly due to an alleged confession from a prosecution witness.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 5 describes how, within the last century, mounting scholarly evidence has exposed institutional flaws within our judicial and police systems, resulting in the convictions of innocent persons for capital crimes. In some cases, overzealous behavior by police and prosecutors, led to the imprisonment of “factually” innocent defendants. While police sometimes coerced confessions or failed to conduct full investigations, prosectors and judges failed to evidence which might exonerate the defendant. Other judicial violations found through study included failure to follow courtroom procedures related to rule of law. One of the first wrongful conviction initiatives was through a congressional investigation in 1912. Although a noble undertaking for its time, the reports was flawed in its evidentiary compilation. The data was poorly collected and its findings poorly deduced. According to the report, no innocent person had been executed by the Federal government.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The adversarial nature of formal conflict resolution upon which our common law system is based often neglects to provide American citizens with justice. Clearly justice can be defined in a list of different ways, and justice cannot be regarded as one definite, worldwide accepted ideal. For the purposes of this discussion, however, the function of criminal trials in the U.S. will be defined in the most simple of terms: the discovery of the truth in a given situation through due process of law, such that those who are guilty of crimes portrayed by arranged laws are punished through fines, imprisonment, and other established reprimands. This truth, however, is sometimes not reached in trials, and the adversarial system is often to blame for this failure. More specifically, it is the roll that attorneys play within this system in which it is the responsibility of these officials only to win cases with any means legally possible, not to aid the discovery of true facts that prevent the system’s ability to uncover the truth in matters. Thus, the adversarial roll of lawyers within the legal system hinders the pursuit of discovering who, in fact, is innocent, and who is guilty in legal disputes and trials, effectively impeding the system’s ability to achieve its purpose in the aforesaid…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The United States criminal justice system prides itself on being fair and just. Even if it is one of the best systems in existence, it is not flawless. Wrongful convictions continue to occur despite existing safeguards aimed at limiting wrongful convictions. According to the Global Registry of Claims of Innocence, approximately 15% of inmates claim to be innocent nationwide (2014). Based on exoneration rates, of the 15% claiming innocence between one and five percent of inmates are truly innocent (Global Registry of Claims of Innocence, 2014). Several factors prevent wrongfully convicted individuals from proving his or…

    • 2617 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Justice

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Describe Goffman’s “moral career of the mental patient” through its three phases. How is the patient’s self-identity thus gradually redefined in the context of the hospital as a total institution.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    For every innocent person wrongfully convicted, a guilty person roams free. It is unsettling to know that thousands of people are wrongfully convicted resulting in thousands of guilty people still roaming the streets and flying under the radar. We continue to walk the streets with murderers and rapists while innocent men and women sit in prison and are even executed. It is sad to think how flawed our justice system can be. It is completely unacceptable for thousands of people to be convicted based on little to no evidence. Many wrongfully convicted people miss out on decades of their lives and their families’ lives, and even if they are exonerated it doesn’t account for all the lost time nor does it change the fact that…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It took four hours for them jurors to come back with a guilty verdicts on Couey, the subject was a convicted sex offender already before the murder of the victim he had admitted before the trial he had killed Lunsford. His confession was thrown out by the judge because the police had made an error by not having a lawyer present during his confession although the psychologist testified that Couey showed signs of mental illness and retardation. The jury that convicted him convened again the trial sentencing phase recommended that he be put to death a recommended by Judge Richard Howard for his part.…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PACE

    • 2022 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In 1972, the murder of Maxwell Confait came before the courts. Two were convicted of the crime. A report was taken out by Sir Henry Fisher into the inquiry of system failures within the conviction process. The main issue was that of the police investigative processes which were put to blame for the miscarriages of justice this case (Newburn, Williamson & Wright, 2007). The Fisher report raised questions between administrative inquires and the judicial system, however, the report was not just an inquiry about facts of the law, but also a plan for change within the law (McBarnet, 1978).…

    • 2022 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Justice is the concept of moral rightness that is based on equality, access and fairness. This means that the law is applied equally, understood by all people and does not have a particularly harsh effect on an individual. In Australia, the adversary system is used as a means to achieve justice by proving the accused, beyond reasonable doubt, committed the crime. The criminal trial process has many features which aim to fulfill the requirements of achieving justice. These elements, though considers equality, fairness and access, are flawed in practice. Flaws such as the handling of evidence, jurors not understanding instructions, inadequate funds for legal representation and controversial use of defences prove the criminal trial process ineffective.…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The concept of justice involves fair, just and equal treatment. These facets are found in a person’s personal, moral courage and integrity however fairness and equality can often be limited by prejudice and discrimination. This means that those who fall victim to injustice are not subjects because of their own actions but are rather victims of a system, society or collective action.…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The concept of justice can mean something a little different to everyone, but it conveys a sense that when a person is wronged by another they will receive some type of recompose in either the person being punished; they received their item back or other compensation that fulfills the feeling of being wronged. According to Nidich, R., Nidich, S. and Alexander (2005):…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is justice? This may seem like a simple question to answer but for many in today’s society it is not. Individuals throughout society have their own explanation of justice. It is a word in which every person has a different meaning. Although "Justice" has a vast list of meanings, it can somewhat be defined. Loosely, it can be defined as “The quality of being just; fairness”. Although what justice means to me is being punished for a crime that has been committed. The offender has to pay for his/her causes. Punishments include variations such as death sentence or imprisonment etc. For most of the people justice has moreover the same meaning. Personally I believe that punishment should fit the crime. Two wrongs do not make a right. I believe that every victim has a right to get justice. In the eye of the law , justice should be given fairly to everyone no matter how but it should be given to some extent. Justice is usually…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays