Preview

Justice: Is It a Higher Level of Moral Thinking?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
566 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Justice: Is It a Higher Level of Moral Thinking?
Justice Justice is about balance. Nowadays people always think that justice is law; some high moral person even think justice is about forgiveness. They use so many words to prove their point. If you think about it, you will know their point is full of paradoxes. If people learn about psychology, you must know reinforcement. Forgiveness is just reinforcing the Criminals to do it again. Law is just a system to control. Justice is much more complicated and cannot be define with few words. Justice provide the right and the responsibility at the same time, It separate us from animal that it give us the power to judge about right and wrong.
Justice is a higher order of Vengeance. By the action, you cannot separate the different between vengeance and justice. The different between this two thing can only tell by the motivation. Vengeance is all about making people feel better, but justice is much more than that. Criminals need to pay for what they have done. This world is all about action and reaction, nobody can take without pay. That why death penalty is a must to maintain justice. Nothing can pay to take a life but another life. This world can only be function when everything is in balance. It is same to our society because if everyone take whatever they want without price, soon there will be nothing left. It will be the end of a society. As you can see, vengeance and justice is also talking about taking back the price that people supposed to pay, but vengeance is just an action, but justice is an ideal, a faith. Justice. Crime cannot be tolerated. Criminals thrive on the indulgence of society's understanding. Forgiveness is just an excuse to give up justice. Forgiveness will reinforce the criminals to commit crime again and again. It will just break the balance of society. Justice is something that deserves to stand up for even the cost is your life. Every time people shrink back, more thing people will lose. Justice cannot accept exceptional, crime is like a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    classes, apologizing and meeting with all those affected in the crime. The concept of restorative…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a novel by William Styron, a father tells his son that life “is a search for justice.”…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle once said, “It is in justice that the ordering of society is centered”. In our society there are theories of justice, which is Retribution, Utilitarianism and Restitution. These forms have similarities and differences and are use in many different social groups every day.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The separation between justice and vengeance is very distinct: On the one hand, justice may not satisfy one’s emotions, but it will ultimately lead to the right decision in the long run; on the other hand, vengeance, may give one self satisfaction, and feel as if it is providing closure, but may result in the victim feeling empty, and making it difficult for them to move on. In the article “The Place for Vengeance,” written by Shannon Brownlee and Dan McGrath, the authors discuss the emotional and mental impact…

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the novel, The Marrow of Tradition by Charles W. Chesnutt, it seems like vengeance is viewed differently through the lens of different characters. For example, the vengeance that Josh Green seeks upon Captain McBane, which is murdering him because of a past incident, and the vengeance that the whites of Wellington seek through lynching are not necessarily described as thoughts of vengeance. The novel does not necessarily state that there is a similar idea behind the concept vengeance between both situations. But, if we overlook these situations, one can argue that Chesnutt is trying to prove that there is not a difference between both situations because they both try to solve a problem through violence which results in a cycle of vengeance…

    • 1718 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice isn't really about “getting even” or experiencing joy in retaliation, rather it is about righting a wrong that society would agree is morally culpable. Revenge possesses a selfish quality: arrogance, vindication, ruthlessness. Revenge shall not be confused with justice; however, societal standards have allowed these two to become false inverses. As seen in numerous novels, poems and theatrical productions, characters interpret justice as revenge and revenge as justice— so does society.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The “principle of justice” itself is a law of the society we live in. In today’s world, every individual is born with various scenarios of what his or her life may become, and an individual starts to choose what he wants and needs for his/her scenario. It is like in a buffet, go and take what you want, but follow the rules. Nobody is allowed to steal from another plate, or kill in order to take somebody else’s plate, or take somebody’s plate by means of unlawful schemes and manipulation. People are still very unpredictable creatures. There are no strict laws that can predict human behavior without mistakes, like in math or physics. That is why people are responsible for the choices they make and can be punished for…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    White-collar Crime- Crime

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    13. Retribution- an act of moral vengeance by which society makes the offender suffer as much as the suffering caused by the crime.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The difference of justice and injustices is that justice is the act and notion of upholding moral righteousness and equity. Injustice is the violation and complete disregard of moral rightiousness and equity. Injustice can refer to an event or occurrences that relate to unfairness and the violation other people’s rights.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Immoral actions such as possession and use of drugs are common elements relating to crimes. Notably, these variables impact the procedure of applying the law fairly to all offenders of all crimes. Though restorative justice and retribution may work together in theory, it may not work in practice. Thus, our current system of retribution, (which identifies with negative judgment), is the prevailing form of justice in our society. The principle of Retributive justice is to correct the wrong and prevent retaliation by the…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Retribution offers a path to criminals who are unable to rejoin society or change the person they are, as well as providing peace to those damaged or hurt by convicts. Retribution provides a sense of security knowing justice has been delivered. In turn, retribution reinforces the idea that crimes have serious punishment and those who have the potential to commit crimes may follow the same paths if they do not learn from others…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Restorative justice is an approach to justice that focuses on the needs of the victims and the offenders, as well as the involved community, instead of satisfying abstract legal principles or punishing the offender. Restorative Justice approaches to crime date back thousands of years. The word restorative justice has appeared in written sources since the first half of the nineteenth century. In Restoring Justice –An Introduction to Restorative Justice, Daniel W. Van Ness and Karen Heetderks Strong say that the term “restorative Justice” was likely coined by Albert Eglash in 1958 when he distinguished between three approaches to justice: (1) “retributive justice”, based on punishment. (2) “Distributive justice” involving therapeutic treatment of the offenders; and (3) “restorative justice,” based on restitution with input from the victims and offenders. Author Howard Zehr stated that “with crime, restorative justice is about the idea that because crime hurts, justice should be healed. It follows that conversations with those who have been hurt and with those who…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    3. What is retribution? The amount of punishment imposed on the offender should equal the amount of harm done by the offender the punishment should be proportional to the seriousness of the crime and by the culpability of the offender.…

    • 1280 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Arguing a Position Essay

    • 2252 Words
    • 10 Pages

    What is Justice? As defined by Dictionary.com; it is the quality of being just; righteousness, equitableness, moral rightness: to hold the justice of a cause. Conformity to this principle, as manifested in conduct; just conduct, dealing, or treatment. When I read the different explanations of the word Justice, all were fitting to give a concise clarification on this subject within the judicial systems all across the world. Historically, African American men are more likely to be incarcerated or imprisoned than any other race.…

    • 2252 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first and oldest of the four justifications for punishment is retribution. Retribution is defined as… "An act of moral vengeance by which society makes the offender suffer [sic] as much as the suffering caused by the crime" (Macionis, J., 2006, p. 182). This type of justification for punishment has been in effect since the Middle Ages when crime was viewed as sin against God and society. Retribution was designed to satisfy humankind 's…

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays