1. If Javier sued Energy-Auto Inc., identify who would be the plaintiff and the defendant.
2. In which state or states can the suit be brought?
3. Assume that Javier incurred $100,000 in damages.
a) Analyze whether the suit can be brought in federal court
b) Explain the advantages and disadvantages of federal versus state court for this type of suit.
Case 1. Javier is traveling from his home in New York to Dallas, Texas. While driving through Oklahoma, his brakes fail and he is injured in the ensuing crash. Javier wants to sue the maker of his car, Energy-Auto Inc. Energy's headquarters is in New York. It does not have any dealerships in Oklahoma or do any advertising in Oklahoma.
In this case Javier was driving his car from New York to Dallas, Texas when his brakes failed in Oklahoma where he injured himself. Javier would be the plaintiff because he is the one suing, and Energy- Auto Company would be the defendant in this matter because this company is the one being sued. The suit would then have to be brought in the state of New York considering that this company does not have dealerships in Oklahoma nor does it do any advertising. This would give personal jurisdiction to New York and not Oklahoma. Had this Auto Company advertised or had any dealerships in Oklahoma then this case could be brought to the courts of Oklahoma for jurisdiction. New York courts can refuse to hear this case and with Javier being a resident of Dallas could possibly have his case heard there considering the fact that Javier has incurred $100,000 in damages he could possibly be immobile from an accident like that. This case can also be brought to federal court for the simple fact that both the plaintiff and defendant are both out of state parties, and would be heard at federal court under diversity jurisdiction. The advantage of federal versus state court would be a judge wouldn’t lose its job for making the wrong ruling in this case which is why its sent to federal court and rulings are heard from a judge that has been appointed forever or until he/she is impeached or reaches retirement. This allows in my opinion, room for fair equal treatment. Disadvantage would be state vs. federal court is the state wouldn’t have subject matter jurisdiction in this case and wouldn’t know how to handle it.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In 2005, Robey who runs his business in Sikeston, Missouri sold a used 2002 Cadillac Escalade to a Kentucky resident, Hinner, over ebay auction. As Robey advertised, the car was “clean, better and average” and with an “ 1 month/1,000 mile Service Agreement”. After Hinner bought the car, he realized that the car was not as advertised. Robey argued that since he was not a resident, and the lack of personal jurisdiction that he should be dismissed.…
- 257 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Based on the information provided in the first hypothetical case problem in our text, if Javier decided to sue Energy-Auto Inc., Javier would be the plaintiff (the entity that is suing) and Energy-Auto Inc. would be the defendant (the entity that is being sued). Javier could sue in New York as our text states “… the action should be brought in the state with closer ties to the litigants or the subject matter of the action” (Rogers, 2012, sec. 1.2). He could also sue in Oklahoma, as that is where Havier was injured, so long as he provides due process (service of process). His injury in Oklahoma meets the minimum contact requirement for personal jurisdiction. “Minimum contacts may consist of doing business in the forum state, causing an injury there, or owning real estate there” (Rogers, 2012, sec. 1.2).…
- 275 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Client, Justin King, claims he was a potential rising star (a singer) who had won the “National Idol Regional Contest” last year, on April 5th, in Chicago and that he was awarded a three year recording contract for $275,000 a yr plus a percentage of all sales with MCI Records. Mr. King further states that due to an accident on Interstate 57, just south of Chicago, he is now unable to fulfill his contractual duties because of injuries sustained to his jaw and face. Mr. King goes on to state that on or around the 8th of April he had left his agents house after signing his contract. He states that he was driving his motorcycle and was on his way home and he was “pretty freaking happy.” He said that he was driving in the left hand lane, going southbound on Interstate 57 when he noticed a beer truck going in the same direction (he’s unsure of the name-it’s either Coops, Coops Light or Coops Ultra), coming…
- 1310 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Our Client, Froogle (“Froogle”) has retained our firm to file suit againt Mary, a small manufacturer and retailer of downhill snow skis. Froogle and Mary signed an agreement in January of 2012. On or about March 15, 2012 Froogle discovered that Mary had breached several of the terms of their agreement. We filed suit in Superior Court for the County of Monterey in Salinas, California on behalf of Froogle on May 31,2012. Mary, a resident of Vermont, responded by filing a motion for non-conveniens claiming that because her business and residence are in Vermont, California has no jurisdiction over her. Mary violated the terms of her agreement and should be brought to answer for her actions in a California court of law, as Froogle’s main place of business is Salinas, California.…
- 1122 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Solve problem 68 on page 539 of Elementary and Intermediate Algebra, and make sure to study the given graph. For the purposes of the assignment, it would be helpful to copy the graph onto your own scratch paper.…
- 262 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
A CEO named Donald Margolin bought a bottle of Funny Face on the Internet after hearing it marketed. This product turned Mr. Margolin’s face a permanent shade of blue and he filed a suit in the state of New York. The problem with this case is that the parties are from two different states. Being from two different states, the case could be brought in federal and state court. The website for Funny Face states that anyone who purchases their products can not take them to court and all disputes must be brought in the state of Florida. Due to “the defendants not living in New York, they could argue that the State of New York did not have…
- 649 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Choose one of the opening cases from chapter 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5. Answer the opening case questions found at the end of section 1 and section 2 for the corresponding chapter. Be sure to list the chapter and the title of the case in your answer.…
- 2266 Words
- 10 Pages
Good Essays -
Personal jurisdiction also known as personam jurisdiction is the courts authority over the parties involved in the dispute (Melvin, S.P., 2011, p59). Personal jurisdiction, defined in this manner, the parties involved can be a business or an individual. It is the courts responsibility to determine fairness to all parties involved while complying with the laws of the federal constitutional requirements. The court determines personal jurisdiction over a party who lives in another state by a state long-arm statute. The court must determine if the out of state defendant, transacts business in the other state, commits a negligent act which leads to a loss to the other party, or owns property within the state (Melvin, S.P., 2011, p61). The court will look at Truckers lawsuit to determine if the State of Confusion’s statute causes a loss to Trucker’s business. The injurious effect will be taken into consideration at the lower courts level. Does the statute of the State of Confusion cause an injurious effect on the Tanya Trucker a resident of the State of Denial?…
- 1500 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Steve often purchases office supplies from Supplymax. a company with stores in many states, but none in Steve home state of Missouri. Supplymax does, however, maintain a distribution center in Kansas City. Missouri. Supplymax does not advertise in Missouri except that it places a few advertisements in national magazines. Some of which are sold in Missouri. Steve has an agreement with their store in Chicago. and Steve will often contact the Chicago store and have them hold items for him to pick up when he is on one of his frequent business trips to Chicago. Last year. Steve purchased eight chairs from Supplymax to use with his Conference table at his business. At a recent meeting with his local sales staff. One of the chairs collapsed injuring Steve. Steve has sued Supplyimax in state court in his hometown of St Louis. Supplymax does not want to have this case heard in Si. Louis. Or anywhere in Missouri for that matter. But if it must be in Missouri. Supplymax demands that the case be heard in Kansas City. Discuss the issues and likely outcome of his situation.…
- 394 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In this paper I will discuss a case involving Henry, a resident of Nevada, who sued Adam, a resident of Utah in the Federal Court in California. Henry sought $60,000 damages for personal injuries arising from an automobile accident that occurred in Los Angeles, California. I will answer the following questions about this case. Does the Federal Court have jurisdiction? What rules of procedure will the court use? Why? And what rules of substantive law will the court use? One of the most essential questions of law is whether a given court has jurisdiction to preside over a given case. Jurisdiction means the power to hear a case. Many courts have limited jurisdictions or limited powers, meaning they can only hear certain types of cases. “An example of this type of limited power is “municipal courts that are limited to city’s residents” (Morgan et al., 2010, p. 29). Any court owns jurisdiction over matters only to the degree granted to it by the Constitution, or legislation of the authority on behalf of which it functions. The question of whether a given court has the power to determine a jurisdictional question is itself, in my opinion a jurisdictional question.…
- 868 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
1. Is this a civil or criminal case? What is the basis of your answer? (5 pt.)…
- 592 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The judge listens to both sides of the case to make a recommendation to the jury of what outcome to decide.…
- 1137 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
1. Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of Cook County, State of Illinois.…
- 540 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
5. According to the case, why didn't the court approve summary judgment for product liability claims? (5 points)…
- 472 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Striking a person without their willful consent is regarded assault / battery. An attempt to strike another, as long as there is a present ability to do so constitutes as assault even when no contact has been made. Thus for a charge to be considered an assault there must be an intention to use violence, the power to use violence, and the plaintiff must be in reasonable grounds to believe that they are in direct danger. When the plaintiff (Bruce) exited his vehicle after pulling over and blocking defendant (Dyers) path, and walked towards the defendants car shaking his fist, there was reasonable grounds for the defendant to believe he was about to be attacked. Thus the defendant’s action was out of self defense. The following actions of the plaintiff prove the grounds self defense:…
- 762 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays