Preview

Judith Thompson A Defense Of Abortion Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
158 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Judith Thompson A Defense Of Abortion Summary
In A Defense of Abortion, Judith Thompson provides a variety of thought experiments that, while based on the premise of the fetus’ right to life, argue that a woman’s choice over her body, whatever it may be, cannot be deemed unjust or immoral. In “the violinist” experiment, Thompson suggests that a pregnant woman owes nothing, let alone her life, to the fetus inside of her. Similarly, in the Henry Fonda case, she defends the idea that regardless of the cost to the woman, her refusal to see a pregnancy through is not unjust despite it being socially considered self-centered, careless, or indecent. Finally, in the “people-seeds” experiment, Thompson states that not only would it be unreasonable to hold a woman accountable for allowing herself

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    or them felt they were ending a life. They are wise enough to know how they…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    "Special Interview: Evelyn Becker Speaks out in Favor of a Woman's Choice to Have an…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to write this report accordingly, three internet sources and one book source have been used.…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The article, The Case For Late Term Abortions written by Jim Buie was appeared in Newsweek on June 17, 2009. In the article the author uses personal experiences, political and social/legal issues to support his stance on legal late term abortions. He begins his article by mentioning the murder of Dr. George Tiller a late term abortion doctor and his brother Jon who was mentally challenged.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Don Marquis believed that abortion was impermissible. He wrote a paper titled Why Abortion is Immoral which he argues about how abortion is seriously immoral and is in the same category as killing an innocent adult human being. Marquis’s arguments are the opposite of what it is that I am arguing. Marquis believes that a fetus is a person, so a fetus has a right to life. He believes that unless it is extreme circumstances it is immoral to kill a normal adult human because it causes “the loss to the victim of the value of its future” (Marquis, 192) and this is the equivalent to what happens when someone has an abortion.…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reading “A defense of Abortion” by Judith Jarvis Thomson and what he had to say with his violinist analogy involving the kidney replacement. I agree with what he has to say on not only abortion itself but, whether or not a fetus should have the right to the women’s body. I don’t think that the fetus should be given the right to use the women’s body because what if she does not what to have a baby and ends up getting pregnant anyway. Also, each time a woman engages in sexual intercourse, she is not inviting the fetus to live inside her body. This is why birth control and other contraceptives are not a sure deal when dealing with sexual intercourse. What if the birth control method fails and the women end's up getting pregnant? She did…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Take-home Assignment! 1.! a. Clearly state the formal reconstruction (i.e. premise 1, premise 2, and conclusion) of the Pope’s argument against abortion as it was presented in class. (1 point)!!…

    • 1493 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The statement "defense of abortion", gives us an another view to a problem of abortion. Mostly, Judith Jarvis Thompson protects pro-choice side, and she says that abortion is not immoral, and that it is logically correct action. However there are a lot of anti-abortion philosophers who are not agree with it. So Judith Thompson gives an arguments to proof her sides correctness. She says that mother has all rights to do anything with her body and things in her body. Judith Jarvis Thompson also believes that fetuses are not persons, and killing them is not immoral. However she says that there are also situations, when abortion is incorrect. Also she gave 3 main thought experiments to get another point of view to abortion.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abortion has always been a controversial topic in America. People have been separated into “pro life” and “pro choice” groups who support completely opposite topics. In “When Abortion Suddenly Stopped Making Sense”, Frederica Mathewes-Green successfully persuades readers why she is against abortion by utilizing personal anecdotes when switching from pro choice to pro life, alarming statistics and exposing a baby’s humanity using sympathetic language.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    By treating the fetus as a person, she takes into account the rights of both the mother and the fetus. However, she doesn’t base her arguments on possible futures, like Marquis- instead she compares their situations (one party growing within, the other being forced to house it), personal rights, and responsibilities to one another (if any). What was particularly convincing to me about her argument was how she argued that abortion does not need to be decent or unselfish to be morally permissible. This removes a lot of the responsibility of a mother to keep an unwanted fetus just to be a “good person”, rather than end their unwanted pregnancy. Thompson’s definition of the right to life was also significant to me.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In philosophical literature, Marquis argued that abortion was/is immoral, except only in rare exceptions, but more importantly he noted that prochoice and anti-abortion arguments cannot be symmetric thus making discussion on the topic quite a conundrum. Marquis purported the arguments of anti-abortionist, who asserted and believed that life is present at or from the moment of conception, and that fetuses look like babies, possess genetic code, and are therefore in possession of the qualities and attributes of being humans. While pro-choicers typically assert that fetuses are not persons as they are not rational agents or social beings. Marquis did however exclaim that anti- abortionist and pro-choicers arguments/beliefs exhibit two similarities,…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The subject of abortion is a very touchy matter in today’s society. Numerous people who feel abortion is a morally wrong thing to do, call themselves pro-life. Those who believe a woman can make the choice whether or not to have an abortion are pro-choice. It’s up to every individual to have an opinion on the topic in regards to what they feel is right. However, is it appropriate to force one’s beliefs on another person? Wouldn’t that be a breach of our first amendment, the separation between church and state?…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abortion Ethics Paper

    • 554 Words
    • 2 Pages

    P1: Whether or not the unborn has a right to life, it does not have a right to…

    • 554 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thompson feels that its false. In her first thought experiment, she goes on talk about how one day you just wake up in the hospital with a famous violinist attached to your kidneys, and he needs the use of your kidneys for nine months. You have to keep in mind that every person has a right to life and so the violinist has a right to life so it would be impressionable to unplug the violinist. You also have a right to bodily integrity which trumps a right to life. This example shows us that there are some cases in which abortion is morally permissible. This analogy about a pregnancy that resulted from a…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In submitting this assignment with this cover page, I am hereby stating that: (1) I have voluntarily read, understand, and agree to uphold and abide by the syllabus plagiarism policy for this class; (2) I have neither plagiarized any other author’s written material or unwritten ideas or enabled (intentionally or unwittingly) other students to plagiarize any part of this assignment; (3) I have neither shown or even discussed my assignment with any other student; and (4) I voluntarily accept the consequences stipulated in the syllabus plagiarism policy for this class should my statements in (1), (2), or (3) above prove false.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays