Preview

Judicial Review Pros And Cons

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1278 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Judicial Review Pros And Cons
Essay 3 Judicial review is part of the United States' method of checks and balances within our government. The Supreme Court has the power to analyzes acts of the Legislative (Congress) and Executive (Presidential) branches to make certain they do not become too powerful or revoke the Constitutional rights of American’s citizens. It was the ruling in the court case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803 by Chief Justice John Marshall that demarcated the principal used by the Justice review even still today. As Americans, we are govern by the laws of our country, state, and county for the harmonious right to pursue happiness in the land of the free and brave. Words or actions which ordinarily and in many places, would be within the freedom of speech …show more content…
The Texas v. Johnson of 1989 is one of the cases in which the law of a state was challenged as being unconstitutional by preventing a symbolic speech expression, which is under the protection of the First Amendment. The U.S. Supreme Court is the highest court in America, its decisions set standards that all other courts then follow, and no lower court can ever overtake a Supreme Court decision. Article Ⅴ, of the Constitution bring balance to our governmental system.

“From the beginning, Americans have embraced and idolized the notion of fundamental higher-order, immutable law that is somehow superior to politics. It is a view that entails rights enshrined in a constitution and interpreted by judges, who extend their authority over ever larger domains” (Grant). Although the judicial review system is a part of the American governmental structure, judicial review is not an American invention, but a customary part of British common law that became part of the legal practice in the United States. In legislating the Judiciary Act of 1789, Congress obviously made provision for the exercise of the power, and in other disputable questions of constitutionality and of judicial review that were

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Judicial Independence Within a Political Process. Our judicial branch of government was designed not only to serve as a check on the power of the executive and legislative branches but also to be the final arbiter on disputes among states and between the states and the federal government. One important arbitration tool utilized by the judicial branch is judicial review. Judicial review is one of the U.S. Constitution’s most provocative features as it plays an important role in shaping the laws that impact our society. For this discussion, complete the following:…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury Vs. Madison Case

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    . Judicial review is usually associated with the U.S Supreme Court and is processed by most state and federal courts of law in the United States. Judicial review also determines whether or not state statues and state executive acts are valid. Judicial review came to part in 1803 where the Marbury VS Madison case was going on it was the first time they ruled the congress unconstitutional. The exercise of judicial review is about the important rules of judicial self-restraint which also allows the burden of proof to be…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early national period, the judiciary was the weakest of the three branches of government. When Chief Justice John Marshall established the principle of judicial review in MarburyMadison by declaring an act of Congress unconstitutional, he greatly strengthened the judiciary. Even though the high court exercised this prerogative only one other time prior to the Civil War (Dred Scott v. Sanford), the establishment of judicial review made the judiciary more of an equal player with the executive and legislative branches.…

    • 325 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law Quiz Chapter 1

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Judicial review refers to the power of district courts to declare a statue or governmental action unconstitutional and void. False Page 110…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    guarantee the honesty of the power allowed to Court Justices and protect them against unjust interference from either the legislative or executive branch. And also to protect our Supreme Judges from political pressure. But, I believe this can still be done by setting an specific time for the judge to leave the position and therefore, I believe it is unnecessary for judges to hold their position for lifetime.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial review is a process that is conducted in the Supreme Court that hears an appeal over lawfulness of a case. It is not focused on the rights and wrongs of…

    • 1086 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Marshall Essay

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Under Article III of the Constitution, the Marbury vs. Madison case was a landmark petition that gave new authorization to the Judicial Review. The Marbury vs. Madison case was unique because it helped define a previously grey argument on the boundaries between the Executive and Judicial branches of the United States Government. William Marbury was the person directly responsible for the petition on this issue. Marbury issued the court to demand Madison to commission his documents. Madison refused to do so claiming that Marbury’s petition was unconstitutional. The decision on the issue was that Marbury did in fact have the right to his commission, however the court did not have to power to force Madison to give it up. This extremely unique scenario on a very important issue raised the authority for the Judicial Review because the Federal court has the obligation to not only satisfy itself but the lower courts. The decision on this case…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The final issue before the Court was to validate their authority in the issuing of writs of mandamus. Since the court held that the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional because…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    in the First Amendment to the Constitution. So why do we need to be concerned…

    • 1862 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Same-sex marriage is now legal across all US states due to a recent ruling from the Supreme Court of America (reference). Judicial review is the authority of a court to repeal unconstitutional government laws and actions (textbook reference). Theoretically, judicial review is there to “protect[] the constitutional rights of individuals” from arbitrary powers of the government. In practice, the court’s ability to do that varies between countries based on their constitutions. Some courts are able to strike down legislations while others can only criticize them. However, there have been debates about how judicial review is undemocratic in nature. This paper aims to argue for the importance of judicial review by further analyzing its characteristics…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Francis Mejia Period 4 Many parts of the United States Constitution can be interpreted in different ways. This makes it difficult to make decisions on cases because of the many possible ways to look at what is constitutional and what is not. In every court decision, The Supreme Court must carefully analyze and interpret the amendments to the Constitution and apply them. The first Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” One controversial case involving the rules of the First Amendment was Snyder v. Phelps in 2010.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    views as to whether or not Judicial review, and the Supreme Court as a whole,…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In America, we are founded upon the rules and guidelines provided by our Constitution, but those rules and guidelines are constantly open to your own interpretation. When certain conflicts arise, we turn to our Constitution for admonition. But where do the provisions of our Constitution end? In the articles “Texas v. Johnson: Majority Opinion” and “American Flag Stands for Tolerance”, the issue of whether or not the First Amendment allows for people to use the burning of the American flag as a form of protest—but one does it better than the other.…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Court System Interview

    • 1334 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When the United States Constitution was established, the founding fathers devised the core of the court system that is present in today’s society. The state and federal government each have a version of a Supreme Court which is typically led by a Chief Justice. The states level Supreme Court Justice governs the issues that pertains to the citizens within the respective state. These individuals will also take part in hearings or proceedings that impact of law of the state and hear constitutional cases with regards to the state. On the federal side, a Supreme Court Chief Justice will operates more on a national level, ruling over cases that such as states taking one another to court. The federal court has authority over anything to do with the United States Constitution and this paper will interview State Supreme Court Justice Roy Moore on the current issue of same-sex marriage that was recently passed for the state of Alabama.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil and Criminal Law

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “The judicial power of the federal courts has been limited by Congress. Essentially, it extends to matters involving (1) questions of federal law (federal question cases), (2) the United States as a party, (3) controversies among the states, and (4) certain suits between citizens of different states (diversity of citizenship).” (Reed et al., 2005, Chapter 3)…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays