Preview

Jrc vs Shear Strength of Granite

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
319 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jrc vs Shear Strength of Granite
EFFECT OF JOINT ROUGHNESS ON
SHEAR STRENGTH OF JOINT IN GRANITE
Introduction
Shear strength is the extreme shear strength where a material can support before rapture. Based on Lama and Vutukuri (1978)[1], it is one of the critical aspects used for designing purpose. There is no doubt that joint is a main factor that leads to failure in every rocks type including granite. In granite, shear strength is one of the main characteristic that needs to be determined in order to classify its strength and stability The measurement of roughness of joint is known as Joint Roughness Coeffiecient (JRC). JRC is directly proportional towards the roughness of joint. Higher roughness of joint surface means higher value of JRC.

Project Objectives
The aim of this project is as followed:

* To determine the roughness of joint that affects its shear strength.

* To undertake shear test on joint of known JRC

* To relate JRC with shear strength of joint

Methodologies
In this research, the value of JRC will be determined by referring to the surface profile of granite based on a standard diagram introduced by Barton and Choubey (1977)[2]. Apart of using the observation method, JRC is also calculated empirically. As a result, the value of JRC obtained will be related to the shear strength by carrying out the tilt test and Schmidt Hammer while the determination of shear strength is carrying out using direct shear box.

Figure 1: Portable Shear Box Apparatus Model Roctest PHI-10
Result and Achievement
Figure 2 shows the relationship between JRC vs shear strength of granite.
Figure 2: Graph Shear Strength VS JRC

Reference 1. [1] Lama,S. S. and Vutukuri,R. D. (1978). Handbook on Mechanical Properties of Rocks:Testing Techniques and Results. Volume 4 2. [2] Barton, N. and Choubey, V. (1977). The Shear Strength of Rock Joints in Theory and Practice, Rock Mechanics. Vol. 10/1-2. 1-30

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week 6 Lab Report

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages

    (Ref. Figure 6.3) Explain the difference between the fracture surface of quartz sandstone and that of quartzite.…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mill Hall Research Paper

    • 6931 Words
    • 28 Pages

    This site is located approximately 6 km N from the axis of the Nittany Valley Anticline, and 7 km NW of Site 6. The formation is a heavily jointed and steeply tilted sandstone from the Juniata Formation. Close up observations and measurements were not able to be taken due to the road-cut being in a precarious location. Measurements were taken on a preliminary trip to the location and were used for…

    • 6931 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    (http://www.burgess-shale.bc.ca…). Because of the varying angles in which specimens were discovered as well as sediment found within these specimens joints, Harry B. Whittington deduced…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Experiment Two: Stiffness Report from laboratory work performed on 12 May 2011 as a part of the unit of study CIVL2201 Structural Mechanics…

    • 2020 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Geomechanics 2 Report

    • 3352 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The Direct Shear Test is an investigation used by geotechnical engineers used to measure the shear strength properties of a soil. It is noted that the shear strength of a material is a term used to describe a materials ability to resist failing in the direction parallel to the applied force, and therefore an important soil property to be noted by engineers. In this lab test ‘Sydney Sand’ is used to determine the relationship between a given load and a change in cross-sectional area and also show the friction angle of the soil specimen, by testing the sample using what is commonly known as a shear box.…

    • 3352 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Holderness Case Study

    • 2389 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Jointing / Faulting – The more faults and joints a rock has the more susceptible it is to erosion, both from coastal and sub-aerial processes.…

    • 2389 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fossil Story

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Preber, Terje. Engineering Properties of the Maquoketa Shale in Northeastern Illinois. Working paper. American Rock Mechanics Association, 2007. Web. 30 Apr. 2013.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: U.S. Department of Justice. (2005). Quantitative Research on Friction Ridge Patterns. Available: http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/sl000698.pdf. Last accessed 11/13/2010.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2. B B Muvdi, J W Mc Nabb, Engineering Mechanics of Materials, 3rd edition, 1980, Springer-Verlag…

    • 2138 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Job Well Done

    • 5810 Words
    • 24 Pages

    The discusser, having a long and abiding interest in the engineering of jointed rock masses and a particular interest in shallow foundations on rock, welcomes the paper by Singh and Rao for its explicit recognition of rock mass as a discontinuum that requires treatment as such. There are many appealing aspects of the authors’ bearing capacity analysis compared to more conventional approaches. However, the discusser is not able to accept the fourfold failure mode hypothesis, which is fundamental to their concept of bearing capacity for jointed masses. The authors have described failure modes associated with splitting, shearing, sliding, and rotation based on the results of Singh’s testing of a jointed block mass in uniaxial compression and published literature. The discusser does not have access to Singh’s data Singh 1997 but is familiar with Brown’s triaxial tests on block jointed models Brown 1970 and accepts the four failure modes under those test conditions. These failure modes would have wide acceptance throughout rock mechanics circles under general conditions. The point of difference here is that shallow foundations represent particular boundary conditions associated with a half space and, as a consequence, certain failure modes are inhibited. Just as with jointed rock slopes the more likely failure modes are slip by sliding along joints, shearing and toppling by rotation and failure by…

    • 5810 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Hurricane Katrina

    • 2150 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Brodie, Kate, Douglas Fettes, Ben Harte, Rolf Schmid. "Structural Terms Including Fault Rock Terms". Systematics of Metamorphic Rocks. IUGS Sub Commission. Web. 29 January 2007…

    • 2150 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Undrained Triaxial Test

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages

    2. BS EN 1377-8:1990 Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes – Part 8: Shear strength tests (effective stress) [Online] available from bsol.bsigroup.com…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The specimens that are used in this test are normalized in accordance with the standards. The purpose of this experiment is to analyse the hardenability of the three materials such as EN-3 (1015), EN-8 (1040) and EN-24 (4340).…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Joints in the rocks - The more joints a rock has the more exposed it is to erosion, this is because air gets in the rock and when water gets into the joints it lubricates the rock and makes it slippery. This increased the weight and causes the block to fall off. The more joints there is, the weaker the rock is.…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The effect of eccentricity on the load carrying capacity of single angles was studied with the help of normalised load P/Py vs e/x0 curves for specimens S500 and S1100 under compression causing both major axis and minor axis bending as shown in Fig. 4. The ultimate load was normalised with yield strength of specimens, Py and eccentricity was normalised with x0, the distance of centroid of the angle cross section from shear centre.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays