On: 28 December 2012, At: 09:35
Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Journal of Development Effectiveness
Publication details, including instructions for authors and
Why do we care about evidence
synthesis? An introduction to the
special issue on systematic reviews
Howard White & Hugh Waddington
International Initiative for Impact Evaluation, 3ie, London, UK Version of record first published: 18 Sep 2012.
To cite this article: Howard White & Hugh Waddington (2012): Why do we care about evidence synthesis? An introduction to the special issue on systematic reviews, Journal of Development Effectiveness, 4:3, 351-358
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2012.711343
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
For full terms and conditions of use, see: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-andconditions esp. Part II. Intellectual property and access and license types, § 11. (c) Open Access Content
The use of Taylor & Francis Open articles and Taylor & Francis Open Select articles for commercial purposes is strictly prohibited.
The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
Journal of Development Effectiveness
Vol. 4, No. 3, September 2012, 351–358
Why do we care about evidence synthesis? An introduction
to the special issue on systematic reviews
Howard White and Hugh Waddington*
Downloaded by [18.104.22.168] at 09:35 28 December 2012
International Initiative for Impact Evaluation, 3ie, London, UK Systematic reviews are currently in high demand in international development. At least 100 new reviews are ongoing or already completed on a range of topics across the board in international development, many of which were commissioned by policy-making agencies. These new reviews need to be based on answerable questions, using methods of analysis and reporting which are appropriate for social and economic development programmes and relevant to users. This introductory paper lays out why we believe systematic reviews should be an important component of evidence-informed development policy and practice. It concludes by introducing the papers collected in this issue, which aim to demonstrate how reviews can be made to live up to the promises generated around them.
Keywords: systematic reviews; impact evaluation
In the nineteenth century, as the public-health doctor Muir Gray has said, we made great advances through the provision of clean, clear water; in the twenty-ﬁrst century we will make the same advances through clean, clear information. Systematic reviews are one of the great ideas of modern thought. They should be celebrated. (Goldacre, 2009, p. 98)
The use of the systematic reviews methodology is comparatively new among social scientists in the international development ﬁeld, but has grown rapidly in the last 3 years. In the medical ﬁeld, the case for reviews has been based on two main rationales. First, the power of meta-analysis when you pool ﬁndings from inconclusive studies, as demonstrated in the case of the efﬁcacy of corticosteroid treatment for early deliveries captured in the Cochrane Collaboration logo (Greenhalgh 2001, p. 132). Second, reviews have overturned accepted wisdom, as in the recent review which demonstrated the limited efﬁcacy (and harms)...