Joint Acquisition Review Board Essay
The Joint Acquisition Review Board Process
This capstone project examines the Joint Acquisition Review Board. After reviewing relevant literature from various sources the Joint Acquisition Review Board process was able to be broken down into designated groups. The members of the board are broken down to their various tasks. This capstone discusses on how to distinguish if the Joint Acquisition Review Board will need to be used when preparing a contract.
Table of Contents
Page
Abstract i
Chapter
I Introduction 5
Background of the Joint Acquisition Review Board 5
Statement of Hypothesis 6 Significance of the Joint Acquisition …show more content…
“Their schedule would include to schedule meetings, including regular, special, walkthrough, electronic, and emergency meetings. A responsibility would be to determine when the emergency meetings should be conducted. If a special meeting is required the JARB president will set a time, place, and a minimum membership that will be required to attend the special meeting. (Department of the Army)” He or She would be responsible for presiding over all meetings. Another responsibility would be tabling requests for further discussion if a submitted packet is insufficient to make a qualified recommendation. He or She would provide recommendations to the approving authority on the validity of the …show more content…
A proposal can be met using a service contract. The proposal should involve changes to infrastructure. It will extend or change the scope of previously approved procurements. The proposal can also involve contract renewals, new leases, lease renewals, construction, repair, and maintenance requirements. The JARB president will recommend the approval or disapproval of every project or item the board reviews. Then each member must provide an opinion, recommendation, concurrence or nonoccurrence, or comment, thereby advising the appropriate approving command authority. During the meetings the board members should be actively involved in determining the validity of a requirement and ensuring its purchase benefits for the operation in the long run. All board members are required to research issues that will be reviewed before the JARB meeting. The president must give each board member the opportunity to comment on the contents in the packet and what was discussed during the
This capstone project examines the Joint Acquisition Review Board. After reviewing relevant literature from various sources the Joint Acquisition Review Board process was able to be broken down into designated groups. The members of the board are broken down to their various tasks. This capstone discusses on how to distinguish if the Joint Acquisition Review Board will need to be used when preparing a contract.
Table of Contents
Page
Abstract i
Chapter
I Introduction 5
Background of the Joint Acquisition Review Board 5
Statement of Hypothesis 6 Significance of the Joint Acquisition …show more content…
“Their schedule would include to schedule meetings, including regular, special, walkthrough, electronic, and emergency meetings. A responsibility would be to determine when the emergency meetings should be conducted. If a special meeting is required the JARB president will set a time, place, and a minimum membership that will be required to attend the special meeting. (Department of the Army)” He or She would be responsible for presiding over all meetings. Another responsibility would be tabling requests for further discussion if a submitted packet is insufficient to make a qualified recommendation. He or She would provide recommendations to the approving authority on the validity of the …show more content…
A proposal can be met using a service contract. The proposal should involve changes to infrastructure. It will extend or change the scope of previously approved procurements. The proposal can also involve contract renewals, new leases, lease renewals, construction, repair, and maintenance requirements. The JARB president will recommend the approval or disapproval of every project or item the board reviews. Then each member must provide an opinion, recommendation, concurrence or nonoccurrence, or comment, thereby advising the appropriate approving command authority. During the meetings the board members should be actively involved in determining the validity of a requirement and ensuring its purchase benefits for the operation in the long run. All board members are required to research issues that will be reviewed before the JARB meeting. The president must give each board member the opportunity to comment on the contents in the packet and what was discussed during the