John Rawls Research Paper

John Rawls: Problem

John Rawls was neo-kantian and a political thinker of the 20th Century. John Rawls believes justice as fairness to society. Some of society seen justice as an unfairness act but, could not really explain why they may feel justice is unfair. John Rawls helped explain what unfairness may mean to society and that’s subjectivity of justice: what may be fair to me, may not be fair to others. John Rawls explained 2 principles of fairness one is equality and the other is difference. Equality in justice is every person should be treated to where all offices are open to them examples would be jobs, education, living condition, law, and etc. Regardless of social background, ethnicity or even sex individuals should have the same
Things as they are now; are patently unfair. Average life expectancy and world income, richer people are expected to live longer and have on average majority of the worlds income. Sometimes is hard to take this unfairness seriously because we are always told if we work hard enough and never give up we to can gain success, continue to have ambition, effort and perseverance and we can actually make it. The American dream hits everyone individually and allows society to be blind sided by statistics and John Rawls always noticed this about justice. Reason 2. Imagine if you were not you: The reason why society as a whole find it hard to come up with ways of fairness. Those who are benefiting from the justice system does not think twice about what it would be like to not have been in the position they are in now. This reason is where John Rawls came up with the veil of ignorance some individuals implicitly don’t see how the justice system was created to be beneficial only to a certain type of people. This is unfair because we all allegedly are suppose to live in society as one however the just system only benefit to some. This brings us to reason 3. You know what needs to be fixed: any person who did study in the veil of ignorance is going to want 4 things to sum up a perfect system. That is, they would want the schools to be very good, fair level of education and opportunity for everyone regardless of where the school
this $6 increase would help leverage out those who are lesser off. I understand everyone’s reasoning for wanting a wage increase to be financially stable. All together if families are financially stable the economy will also be stable and grow because people will spend more which is bringing the economy up. However, does this not contradict the veil of ignorance? Is giving a wage increase really the solution, wage increase may not be fair to the owners who pays their employees and still have to pay business expense. As wage increases so does the prices of business and business owners does not get a increase in what they make to pay off their workers and still pay the same amount of taxes, if not more. Think about people who attended college for four years put in the time and energy and probably making the same amount as someone who is making minimum wage in their career field. Those career positions would want an increase as well Verizon employees are currently on strike for better package, and MTA bus/transit employees goes on strict every year for higher pay. This solution would contradict the difference principle those who are at a disadvantage would gain an advantage but those who had an advantage would not benefit in fact this would be detrimental to individuals who owns businesses which would make this solution