Preview

Japan Anti-Fraud Cases - Livedoor

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2666 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Japan Anti-Fraud Cases - Livedoor
Jurisdiction: Japan

Contributors:

Prof. Dr. Katsunori Kai, Professor of Law, Waseda University, Former Public Prosecutor
Mr. Suzuki, Public Prosecutor, Law firm of Nagashima, Ohno and Tsunematsu (NO&T)

Anti-Financial Crime Provisions

A) Fraud (the dishonest inducement of conduct for another’s benefit, by false representation) Criminal Law Article 246: Fraud Article 246-2: Computer Fraud (see http://www.cas.go.jp/jp/seisaku/hourei/data/PC2.pdf)

B) Offences involving fraud, but in specific areas of activity such as the financial markets, taxation, company law or obtaining services (and credit) To evade paying income tax or to receive refund of income tax by false information or other foul play. Income Tax Law: Article 238 Corporation Tax Law: Article 159

Counterfeiting of and making false entry in securities Criminal Law Article 162: Counterfeiting Securities Article 163: Uttering Counterfeit Securities

C) Misusing non-public price sensitive information that has been obtained in a special relationship such as a corporate insider

Financial Instruments Transaction Law (Japanese SOX Act) Article 166 and 167: Insider trading Article 166 prohibits related parties to listed company, knowing “the unpublished significant fact” of listed companies, to buy or sell specified securities before the release of that information. Article 167 prohibits a purchaser by open market, knowing “the unpublished significant fact” of listed companies, to buy or sell specified securities before the release of that information.

The Nippon Broadcasting case (insider trading)

The suspect, the effective Managing Director of MAC Asset Management Corporation (corporate suspect), acquired knowledge via Livedoor executives that Livedoor had decided to carry out an open purchase of Nippon Broadcasting shares in order to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hrm/531 Week 3 Quiz

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A. Cannot be sold for longer than a 6-month period. B. Cannot be the subject of an immediate unregistered reoffering to the public. C. Must be sold only to accredited institutional investors. D. Must be sold to fewer than 20 nonaccredited investors. Bird Corp. made a $5 million exempt common stock offering under Rule 505 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933. Thus, the shares were restricted securities. As the issuer of restricted securities, Bird must…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. The Securities Act of 1933 applies to the above-described public offering of securities in interstate commerce – True…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ACC 571 Week 7 Assignment 3 – Fraud Schemes and Fraud Investigations – Strayer Latest…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bus 250 Week 4 Disc1

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 1985 R. Foster Winans a columnist for “The Wall Street Journal” was convicted of giving information to two stock brokers he was writing and article about in his column “Heard On The Street. Foster was charged with insider trading. The stockbrokers make a whopping 690,000 and Winans cut was 31,000. I thin k this case does meet the requirements of inside trading established by the Supreme Court in the case U.S. vs. O’Hagen because the Foster leaked information about contents of a column , “Heard on the Street” before publication. The leaks allowed his stockbroker friends to make trades in anticipation of the impact the column would have and allow them to make a profit before the new hit the street. According to Lawrence inside trading is A person who trades on information that he or she knew was supposed to be confidential is guilty of misappropriation, regardless of whether the trader is directly connected to the company whose shares were purchased. This new law covers anyone who learned and traded on information they knew was illegal. It does not cover people who come across information just by chance…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    violated a Civil Law by engaging in insider trading. Being the one to organize the…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    case study

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The ASX has issued Guidance Note 8 - Continuous Disclosure regime and indicated in Rule 3.1 that listed companies must immediately notify ASX of any information which may have a material effect on the price or value of the entity’s shares or affect investment decisions, and information in which shareholders, investors and ASX have a legitimate interest. This regime also has statutory backing in Section 674, 675 and 677 of Corporations Act.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    hr 343 exam 1 study guide

    • 832 Words
    • 3 Pages

    b) Outsourcing-contracting outside the organization to have work done that formerly was done by internal employees…

    • 832 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Problem Set 1

    • 1646 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Listed companies are required to comply with the ASX’s Listing Rules, which impose some additional disclosure and member protection requirements on those companies.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    LaThis article found in the Wall Street Journal applies to insider trading. Thomas Conradt and David Weishaus bought shares of SPSS Inc. after illegally discovering about their near future acquisition of IBM. They believe Conradt was informed by his roommate at the time in 2009. Conradt then informed Weishaus but asked him to keep quiet claiming “we gotta keep this in the family” and “I don’t want to go to jail”. The two men were arrested last Thursday, November 29, 2012. It is believed that Conradt, Weishaus and three other brokers made more than one million dollars from the information. They each face up to twenty years in prison.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week 5 Article Review

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Legal issues were rampant in the article. For instance, with the issuance of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, companies chose to “go dark” to “no longer trade publically,” (Nogler & Inwon, 2011, p. 67) in order to not have to comply fully with SOX. The article also address whether it is fair or just to make smaller companies follow the same exact rules and fines of such articles as Article 404 of the SOX Act.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rationale: Reg FD reads as follows: “Whenever an issuer discloses any material nonpublic information regarding that issuer, the issuer shall make public disclosure of that information . . . simultaneously, in the case of an intentional disclosure; and . . . promptly, in the case of a non-intentional disclosure.”…

    • 5751 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sebi

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Nebody knows about the Sebi's latest Announce .....?CNBC-TV18 has learnt from sources that Sebi is likely to propose shortswing rule in India. The move restricts company insiders from making short-termprofit at the company’s expense.It is a move that could potentially have a big impact on promoters of listed companies. Market regulator Sebi is proposing to put in place a new rule-theshort swing rule- in India. This is similar to one that exists in the USA.The rule prevents company insiders, who have greater access to materialinformation, from taking advantage of the information to make short-term profits.So, Sebi proposes that company insiders buying and selling their company's stock within…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    rather than merely an obligation to report that she or he is selling stock in a…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: [1] Regulation 2(f) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Foreign Institutional Investors) Regulations, 1995. (http://www.sebi.gov.in/acts/act07a.html)…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (1[PROHIBITION OF] INSIDER TRADING) REGULATIONS, 1992 In exercise of the powers conferred by section 30 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (15 of 1992), the Board, with the previous approval of the Central Government, hereby makes the following regulations, namely:— CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY Short title and commencement. 1. (1) These regulations may be called the Securities and Exchange Board of India (2[Prohibition of] Insider Trading) Regulations, 1992. (2) These regulations shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official 3Gazette. Definitions. 2. In these regulations, unless the context otherwise requires:— (a) “Act” means the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (15 of 1992); (b) “body corporate” means a body corporate as defined in section 2 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956); (c) “connected person” means any person who— (i) is a director, as defined in clause (13) of section 2 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), of a company, or is deemed to be a director of that company by virtue of sub-clause (10) of section 307 of that Act; or (ii) occupies the position as an officer or an employee of the company or holds a position involving a professional or business relationship between himself and the company 4[whether temporary or permanent] and who may reasonably be expected to have an access to unpublished price sensitive information in relation to that company. 5 [Explanation :— For the purpose of clause (c), the words “connected person” shall 6[mean] any person who is a connected person six months prior to an act of insider trading;] (d) “dealing in securities” means an act of 7[subscribing,] buying, selling or agreeing to 8 [subscribe,] buy, sell or deal in any securities by any person either as principal or agent;…

    • 8892 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Powerful Essays