Preview

Conflict of Norms and Legal Reasoning in the European Union Law

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
167509 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Conflict of Norms and Legal Reasoning in the European Union Law
CONFLICT OF NORMS IN EUROPEAN UNION LAW AND THE LEGAL
REASONING OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE
A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Gerard Martin Conway

School of Law
Brunel University
December 2010

ii

Abstract: This thesis examines the topic of conflict of norms in European Union
(EU) law and the legal reasoning of the European Court of Justice (ECJ), arguing that the framework of conflict of norms provides conceptual insight into justification and the role of value choices in legal reasoning. After examining the theory of conflict of norms, which seems to have been relatively under-studied generally and especially in EU law, it examines three particular aspects of norm conflict resolution in the legal reasoning of the ECJ and EU law: conflict of interpretative norms, especially the opposition between conserving and innovative interpretation; conflicts of human rights norms, looking in particular at the idea of a hierarchy of rights and of specificationism in the articulation of rights; and conflicts of competence norms. It concludes that the scope exists for a fuller justification of the choice of norms in the legal reasoning of the ECJ and generally in EU law and offers a perspective on how the values articulated by the EU suggest particular approaches to norm conflict resolution by the ECJ in its decision-making in these fields, in particular, a greater resort to lex specialis and originalist or historical interpretation, in contrast to its current method.

iii

Summary Table of Contents
Notes and Acknowledgments…………………………………………………………......x
Table of Abbreviations………………………………………………………………......xii
Table of Treaties and Legislation……………………………………………………...xvi
Table of Cases…………………………………………………………………………...xix
Chapter 1 – Values and Conflicts of Norms in EU Law and the Legal
Reasoning of the European Court of Justice – Introduction and



Bibliography: Press 2008). Press 1989). Press 2002). Press 2007). J. Bengoetxea, The Legal Reasoning of the European Court of Justice (1993). B. Bercusson, European Labour Law (Cambridge Univ. Press 2nd ed. 2009). I. Berlin, Four Essays on Liberty (Oxford Univ. Press New ed. 2002) (original edition 1969). P. Bobbitt, Constitutional Interpretation (Blackwell 1991). R. Bork, The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law (Simon & Schuster 1990). I. Cameron, The Protective Principle of International Criminal Jurisdiction (Ashgate 1994). P. Craig, EU Administrative Law (Oxford Univ. Press 2006). P. Craig & G. de Búrca, EU Law (Oxford Univ. Press 3rd ed. 2004). P. Craig & G. de Búrca, EU Law (Oxford Univ. Press 4th ed. 2008). D. Davidson, Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective (Clarendon Press 2001). A.V. Dicey, An Introduction to the Law of the Constitution (Macmillan 1885). J. Dickson, Evaluation and Legal Theory (Hart Publishing 2001). S. Douglas-Scott, Constitutional Law of the European Union (Longmans 2002). B. Driesser, Interinstitutional Conventions in EU Law (Cameron May 2007). R. Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (Harvard Univ. Press rev. ed. 1978). R. Dworkin, Law’s Empire (Harvard Univ. Press 1986). R. Dworkin, Freedom’s Law (Harvard Univ. Press 1996). R. Dworkin, Justice in Robes (Harvard Univ. Press 2006). JH. Ely, Democracy and Distrust (Harvard Univ. Press 1980). N. Emilou, The Principle of Proportionality in European Law: A Comparative Perspective (Kluwer 1996). J. Finnis, Natural Law and Natural Rights (Clarendon Press 1980). N. Foster, Foster on EU Law (Oxford Univ. Press 2006). L. Fuller, The Morality of Law (Yale Univ. Press revd. ed. 1969). K. Goldman, S. Berglund & G. Sjöstedt, Democracy and Foreign Policy, the Case of Sweden (Gower 1986). P. Goodrich, Reading the Law: A Critical Introduction to Legal Method and Techniques (Blackwell 1986). RM. Hare, Moral Thinking (Oxford Univ. Press 1981). C. Harlow, Accountability in the European Union (Oxford Univ. Press 2002). HLA. Hart, The Concept of Law (Clarendon Press 2nd ed. 1994). F. Hayek, The Political Ideal of the Rule of Law (National Bank of Egypt 1955). D. Held, Models of Democracy (Polity 3rd ed. 2006). R. Higgins, Problems and Process (Oxford Univ. Press 1994). F. Horn, Reservations and Interpretative Declarations to Multilateral Treaties (TMC Asser Institute 1988).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    European Union (1970?) Article 141 of the EU Treaty. Cited by Thompson Law (2006) Introduction. [Internet].Thompson.…

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Archick, K 2015, ‘The European Union: questions and answers’, Congressional Research Service, p. 4.…

    • 885 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    With reference to case-law, and to the current situation in at least two Member States, explain and critically analyse this statement. What implications would the Member States’ reluctance to incorporate the doctrine of supremacy into their constitutional orders have for the consistency and effectiveness of EU law?…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    n European Law the Ordinary legislative procedure is used when drafting hard law to ensure that the democratically elected representatives of the EU citizens have an equal say in appropriate areas of law making. There will be a brief analyse of the Ordinary legislative procedure and a discussion on it.…

    • 2450 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order for EU law to be effective, individuals need to be able to enforce their rights, so in order to give…

    • 2511 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “…judicial and legislative developments *have+ made the *infringement+ procedure [come] of age- from a rarely used, opaque and policy-driven procedure, it has now become a common, fairly transparent and highly technical procedure.” Prete & Smuldres “The coming of age of infringement proceedings” (2010) 47 CMLR 9 Has the infringement procedure finally “come of age”? Critically outline the key features of the Article 258 TFEU procedure and relevant caselaw. Article 258 TFEU (Formerly Art 226 EC) empowers the European Commission to deliver a reasoned opinion to a member state when it considers that the state has failed to fulfil an obligation under the treaties. The action seeks to “fulfil an obligation under the EC Treaty” and to “obtain a declaration that the conduct of a Member State infringes Community Law and of terminating that conduct”. If the Court of Justice of the European Union finds that the member state has failed to fulfil the obligation the member state shall be required to take the necessary measures to comply with the judgment. Other mechanisms exist to secure the correct application of EU Law, including the principle of direct effect and primacy of EU Law. These measures permits an individual or a company to have their rights enforced before a national court on the basis of EU Law provisions, even if such provisions are not specified within the national legal system where the application is made. Article 258 TFEU can be described as a law enforcement tool against Member States. Each Member State is responsible for the applying EU Law in a manner that is full and correct. The Court has the power to decide if a Member State is meeting its obligations that is has under the Treaties. According to statistics from the Court, approximately 200 cases are lodged before it each year. This accounts for a fraction of the suspected infringements that are investigated. The vast majority of cases are resolved through dialogue and negotiation. As such, court…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Despite the clear pronouncement and endorsement of the principle of supremacy by the Court of Justice of the European Union, Member State Courts have accepted a rather qualified version of it.…

    • 2954 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Universität Hamburg Fakultät Wirtschafts-­‐ und Sozialwissenschaften M.A. European Studies Right to Same-­‐Sex Marriage Under Article 8 ECHR Melek Günay Hamburg, 2013 Table of Contents 1.Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 3 2.Definition of ‘sexual minorities’ ............................................................................................. 5 3.The right of same-­‐sex marriage and the ECHR .................................................................. 6 4.Case Studies ................................................................................................................................... 8 4.1. Rees v UK ..............................................................................................................................................…

    • 7354 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Friedrich a Hayek

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Hayek, F. A. (1978). The Constitution of Liberty. The University of Chicago Press, 133, 394.…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    supremacy

    • 1215 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The aforementioned case stands for the conceptual basis of the supremacy of the EU law since the strength and, evidently, scope of it were developed in later decisions. The subsequent case provides that the legal status of an inconsistent national measure were…

    • 1215 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    11. Klein, G.P. Biography of F. A. Hayek. Ludwig von Mises Institute. [online]. Available at: http://mises.org/about/3234. Accessed on June 10, 2011.…

    • 3193 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    If the ‘law’ is a system of ‘norms’ coded legal/illegal, in considering whether constitutional conventions are ‘law’, we must consider whether their definition fits this description.…

    • 2286 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Struggle of the Identity

    • 12572 Words
    • 51 Pages

    Habermas, J. 1998. The European nation-state: On the past and future of sovereignty and citizenship. Public Culture 10(2):397-416.…

    • 12572 Words
    • 51 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To answer the relation between norms, the grund norm and the legitimacy of law, we first need to understand what Kelsen means by the term ‘grund norm’. ‘Grund norm’ as defined by Kelsen is a norm which is presupposed in juristic thinking and is not a norm created by will of a legal organ. When Kelsen talks about the how the grundnorm is presupposed to be valid, he means that the basic norm, the one norm from which all norms are derived, has to be assumed to be valid. Only then all the current norms that are functional in our society can be validated through it. By supposing that the grund norm is valid all the existing norms can also be considered legitimate, as they are also somehow derived from the same basic norm.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper will analyze one of the most fundamental rules of law in criminal law, the Principle of Legality under the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) found in Article 7 ECHR. “Nullum crimen sine lege, nulla poena sine lege” (“no crime without law, no punishment without law”- NCSL), is often referred to as the Principle of Legality in many legal contexts. It is considered a human right and also at the heart of many national criminal legal systems. It is a crucial element of legal defense to a criminal prosecution in which no crime or punishment can exist without a legal ground. It is a guarantee of human liberty; it ensures the fairness and transparency of the judicial authority and it protects individuals from state abuse and unjust treatment. The principle of legality (“nullum crimen sine lege, nulla poena sine lege”) is found in Article 7 of the ECHR and this paper will also examine the way in which the ECHR has developed the Principle of Legality to encompass three overlapping mechanisms which are: “…only the law can define a crime and prescribe a penalty; the prohibition on retrospective criminal law and the prohibition on the imposition of harsher penalties”.…

    • 2876 Words
    • 83 Pages
    Powerful Essays